To evaluate paediatric CT dosimetry in Australia and New Zealand and calculate size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs) for chest and abdominal examinations.
Eight hospitals provided data from 12 CT systems for 1462 CTs in children aged 0–15. Imaging data were recorded for eight examinations: head (trauma, shunt), temporal bone, paranasal sinuses, chest (mass) and chest HRCT (high-resolution CT), and abdomen/pelvis (mass/inflammation). Dose data for cranial examinations were categorised by age and SSDEs by lateral dimension. Diagnostic reference ranges (DRRs) were defined by the 25th and 75th percentiles. Centralised image quality assessment was not undertaken.
DRRs for 201 abdominopelvic SSDEs were: 2.8–4.7, 3.6–11.5, 8.5–15.0, 7.6–15, and 10.6–16.2 for the <15 cm, 15–19 cm, 20–24 cm, 25–29 cm and >30 cm groups, respectively. For 147 chest examinations using these body width categories, SSDE DRRs were 2.0–4.4, 3.3–7.9, 4.0–9.4, 4.5–12, and 6.5–12. Kilovoltage peak (kVp), but not AEC or IR, was associated with SSDE (parameter estimate [standard error]: 0.12 (0.03); p < 0.0001).
Australian and New Zealand paediatric CT DRRs and abdominal SSDEs are comparable to international data. SSDEs for chest examinations are proposed. Dose variations could be reduced by adjusting kVp.
• SSDEs can be calculated for all patients, CT systems, and practices
• Kilovoltage peak (kVp) has the greatest association with dose in similar-sized patients
• Paediatric DRRs for CT are now available for use internationally
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Automatic exposure control
- CTDIvol :
Computed tomography dose index
Diagnostic reference range
International Atomic Energy Agency
Size-specific dose estimate
Diagnostic reference level
Scan projection radiograph
Townsend BA, Callahan MJ, Zurakowski D, Taylor GA (2010) Has pediatric CT at children's hospitals reached its peak? AJR 194(5):1194–1196
Brady Z, Cain TM, Johnston PN (2011) Paediatric CT imaging trends in Australia. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 55(2):132–142
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284
Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176(2):289–296
UNSCEAR (2010) Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic radiation 2010. United Nations, New York
Preston DL, Kusumi S, Tomonaga M et al (1994) Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part III. Leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, 1950–1987. Radiat Res 137(2 Suppl):S68–S97
Land CE (1995) Studies of cancer and radiation dose among atomic bomb survivors. The example of breast cancer. JAMA 274(5):402–407
Land CE, Saku T, Hayashi Y et al (1996) Incidence of salivary gland tumors among atomic bomb survivors, 1950–1987. Evaluation of radiation-related risk. Radiat Res 146(1):28–36
Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S et al (2007) Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat Res 168(1):1–64
Preston DL, Cullings H, Suyama A, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(6):428–436.
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380(9840):499–505
Matthews J (2013) Cancer incidence in 680,000 Australians exposed to CT scans. BMJ
Donnelly LF, Frush DP (2001) Fallout from recent articles on radiation dose and pediatric CT. Pediatr Radiol 31(6):388, discussion 9–91
The ALARA (2002) (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Multidisciplinary conference organized by the Society of Pediatric Radiology. August 18–19, 2001. Pediatr Radiol 32(4):217–313
Boone JM, Geraghty EM, Seibert JA, Wootton-Gorges SL (2003) Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. Radiology 228(2):352–360
Linton OW, Mettler FA Jr (2003) National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(2):321–329
Donnelly LF (2005) Reducing radiation dose associated with pediatric CT by decreasing unnecessary examinations. AJR 184(2):655–657
Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The ‘Image Gently’ campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatr Radiol 38(3):265–269
Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Frush DP, Butler PF, Morrison G (2009) Image Gently Vendor Summit: working together for better estimates of pediatric radiation dose from CT. AJR 192(5):1169–1175
Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Kaste SC et al (2010) Image gently: Ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR 194(4):868–873
Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79(948):968–980
Galanski M, Nagel HD, Stamm G (2007) Paediatric CT Exposure Practise in the Federal Republic of Germany: Results of a nation-wide survey in 2005/06. Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover
Verdun FR, Gutierrez D, Vader JP et al (2008) CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland. Eur Radiol 18(9):1980–1986
Brisse HJ, Aubert B (2009) CT exposure from pediatric MDCT: results from the 2007–2008 SFIPP/ISRN survey. J Radiol 90(2):207–215
Buls N, Bosmans H, Mommaert C, Malchair F, Clapuyt P, Everarts P (2010) CT paediatric doses in Belgium: a multi-centre study—Results from a dosimetry audit in 2007–2009. Belgian Federal Agency of Nuclear Control (FANC)
Vassileva J, Rehani MM, Applegate K, Ahmed NA, Al-Dhuhli H, Al-Naemi HM (2012) IAEA survey of paediatric computed tomography practice in 40 countries in Asia, Europe, Latin America and Africa: procedures and protocols. Eur Radiol 23(3):623–631
AAPM. Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations. AAPM Report No 204. One Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-38462011
Watson DJ, Coakley KS (2010) Paediatric CT reference doses based on weight and CT dosimetry phantom size: local experience using a 64-slice CT scanner. Pediatr Radiol 40(5):693–703
Goske MJ, Strauss KJ, Coombs LP, Mandel KE, Towbin AJ, Larson DB, Callahan MJ, Darge K, Podberesky DJ, Frush DP, Westra SJ, Prince JS (2013) Diagnostic reference ranges for pediatric abdominal CT. Radiology 268(1):208–218
Kambadakone AR, Prakash P, Hahn PF, Sahani DV (2010) Low-dose CT examinations in Crohn's disease: Impact on image quality, diagnostic performance, and radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(1):78–88
Yu L, Bruesewitz MR, Thomas KB, Fletcher JG, Kofler JM, McCollough CH (2011) Optimal tube potential for radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT: principles, clinical implementations, and pitfalls. Radiographics 31(3):835–848
Yu L, Li H, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH (2010) Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy. Med Phys 37:234–243
Fletcher JG. Adjusting kVP to improve image quality or reduce radiation dose. http://www.aapm.org/meetings/2011CTS/documents/Fletcher_AAPM_2011-AutokV.pd
Hough DM, Fletcher JG, Grant KL, Fidler JL, Yu L, Geske JR, Carter RE, Raupach R, Schmidt B, Flohr T, McCollough CH (2012) Lowering Kilovoltage to Reduce Radiation Dose in Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT: Initial Assessment of a Prototype Automated Kilovoltage Selection Tool. AJR 199(5):1070–1077
Wallace A, Goergen SK, Schick D et al (2010) CT dose: clinical practice improvement strategies from a successful optimization program. J Am Coll Radiol 7:614–624
The authors wish to acknowledge Nancy Kennelly, Nicki Hamilton, Sasko Kadiev, Matthew Ng, Genevieve Howlett, Scott Brown, Deana Maddison, Debbie Watson, Tom Tiang, Michael Saide, Aishwarya Rajan and Shane Handley, who assisted with data collection at all participating sites.
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Adj. Clin. Prof. Stacy Goergen. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. This study has received funding from the Australian Government Department of Health under the Diagnostic Imaging Quality Program. One of the authors has significant statistical expertise. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was not required for this study, as it was a quality assurance activity to monitor, improve and evaluate the quality of health services. Methodology: retrospective, diagnostic or prognostic, multicenter study.
About this article
Cite this article
Jackson, D., Atkin, K., Bettenay, F. et al. Paediatric CT dose: a multicentre audit of subspecialty practice in Australia and New Zealand. Eur Radiol 25, 3109–3122 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3727-y
- Radiation dose
- CT, CT dose optimization
- Diagnostic reference levels
- Size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs)