Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of presence of kidney disease in a general patient population undergoing intravenous iodinated contrast enhanced computed tomography

  • Computed Tomography
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess which risk factors can be used to reduce superfluous estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements before intravenous contrast medium administration.

Methods

In consecutive patients, all decreased eGFR risk factors were assessed: diabetes mellitus (DM), history of urologic/nephrologic disease (HUND), nephrotoxic medication, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, age > 60 years, anaemia, malignancy and multiple myeloma/M. Waldenström. We studied four models: (1) all risk factors, (2) DM, HUND, hypertension, age > 60 years; (3) DM, HUND, cardiovascular disease, hypertension; (4) DM, HUND, age > 75 years and congestive heart failure. For each model, association with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 was studied.

Results

A total of 998 patients, mean age 59.94 years were included; 112 with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and 30 with eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m2. Model 1 detected 816 patients: 108 with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and all 30 with eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m2. Model 2 detected 745 patients: 108 with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and all 30 with eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m2. Model 3 detected 622 patients: 100 with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and all 30 with eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m2. Model 4 detected 440 patients: 86 with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and all 30 with eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m2. Associations were significant (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Model 4 is most effective, resulting in the lowest proportion of superfluous eGFR measurements while detecting all patients with eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 and most with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2.

Key Points

• A major risk factor for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is kidney disease.

• Risk factors are used to identify patients with pre-existent kidney disease.

• Evidence for risk factors to identify patients with kidney disease is limited.

• The number of eGFR measurements to detect kidney disease can be reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CIN:

contrast-induced nephropathy

DM:

diabetes mellitus

eGFR:

estimated glomerular filtration rate

FN:

false negatives

FP:

false positives

HUND:

history of urologic or nephrologic disease

MDRD:

modification of diet in renal disease

NSAIDs:

non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

TN:

true negatives

TP:

true positives

WHO:

World Health Organisation

References

  1. Fishman EK, Reddan D (2008) What are radiologists doing to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) compared with measures supported by current evidence? A survey of European radiologists on CIN associated with computed tomography. Acta Radiol 49(3):310–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. RIVM (2012) Het aantal CT-onderzoeken voor de jaren 1991 tot en met 2011. http://www.rivm.nl/Onderwerpen/M/Medische_Straling. Accessed 17 Jan 2013

  3. Nyman U, Almén T, Jacobsson B, Aspelin P (2012) Are intravenous injections of contrast media really less nephrotoxic than intra-arterial injections? Eur Radiol 22(6):1366–1371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewington A, MacTier R, Hoefield R, Sutton A, Smith D, Downes M (2013) Prevention of contrast induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in adult patients. http://www.rcr.ac.uk/docs/radiology/pdf/2013_RA_BCIS_RCR.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2013

  5. Board of the Faculty of Clinical Radiology (2011) Standards for intravascular contrast agent administration to adult patients, 2nd edn. http://www.rcr.ac.uk/docs/radiology/pdf/BFCR(10)4_Stand_contrast.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2013

  6. Thomas M, Davies A, Dawnay A et al. (2013) Acute kidney injury prevention, detection and management of acute kidney injury up to the point of renal replacement therapy. NICE Clin Guidel (August). http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/14258/65056/65056.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2013

  7. Wetzels JFM, Bronzwaer JGF, Geenen RWF, Holsman S, van der Jagt EJ, van Marum RJ, Maseland MHH, Nienehuis-Brands HA, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Reichert LJM, van Rossum LK et al. (2009) Voorkomen van nierinsufficiëntie bij intravasculair gebruik van jodiumhoudende contrastmiddelen. https://www.nvvc.nl/media/richtlijn/80/Praktijkgids_nierinsufficientie_VMS.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2013

  8. Benko A, Fraser-hill M, Magner P et al (2007) Canadian Association of Radiologists:consensus guidelines for the prevention of conrast-induced nephropathy. Can Assoc Radiol J 58(2):79–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van Dijk R, van Croonenborg JJ, van Logtesteijn SI, Aarts NJM, ten Dam MAGJ, Freericks MP, Geenen RWF, Idema JG, Lelivelt JA, Said SAM, Schimmelpenninck-Scheiffers MLHH, Stuurman A, Wetzels JFMW (2007) Voorzorgsmaatregelen bij jodiumhoudende contrastmiddelen. CBO Richtlijnen. http://www.nvpc.nl/uploads/stand/2617_12_07_Voorzorgsmaatregelen.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2013

  10. Owen R, Hiremath S, Myers A, Fraser-Hill M, Barrett B (2011) Consensus guidelines for the prevention of contrast induced nephropathy. Canadian Association of Radiologists. http://www.car.ca/uploads/standards%20guidelines/20110617_en_prevention_cin.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2013

  11. American College of Radiology (2013) ACR manual on contrast media version 8. http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/Contrast%20Manual/2013_Contrast_Media.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2013

  12. Stacul F, van der Molen AJ, Reimer P et al (2011) Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol 21(12):2527–2541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Choyke PL, Cady J, DePollar SL, Austin H (1998) Determination of serum creatinine prior to iodinated contrast media: is it necessary in all patients? Tech Urol 4(1079–3259 (Print)):65–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tippins RB, Torres WE, Baumgartner BR, Baumgarten DA (2000) Health policy and practice creatinine levels necessary prior to outpatient CT. Radiology 216(14):481–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomsen HS, Morcos SK (2005) In which patients should serum creatinine be measured before iodinated contrast medium administration? Eur Radiol 15(4):749–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kooiman J, Pasha SM, Zondag W et al (2012) Meta-analysis: serum creatinine changes following contrast enhanced CT imaging. Eur J Radiol 81(10):2554–2561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moos SI, van Vemde DNH, Stoker J, Bipat S (2013) Contrast induced nephropathy in patients undergoing intravenous (IV) contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and the relationship with risk factors: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 29(4):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cicin I, Erdogan B, Gulsen E et al (2014) Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in hospitalised patients with cancer. Eur Radiol 24(1):184–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Boer JE, Boomkamp MD, Broekhuijsen F et al. (2014) Farmacotherapeutisch Kompas. Coll. Voor Zorgverzekeringen. http://www.fk.cvz.nl/. Accessed 21 Jan 2013

  20. Gansevoort T, Gaillard M, Hemmelder H, Sijpkens J (2010) Te grondig zoeken naar contrastnefropathie. Medisch Contact 65(40):2089–2092

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vermeeren MAP (2011) Veiligheidsregels jagen kosten op. Medisch Contact 66(35):2073–2076

    Google Scholar 

  22. Richenberg J (2012) How to reduce nephropathy following contrast-enhanced CT: a lesson in policy implementation. Clin Radiol 67:1136–1145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Davenport MS, Khalatbari S, Cohan RH, Dillman JR, Myles JD, Ellis JH (2013) Contrast material-induced nephrotoxicity and intravenous low-osmolality iodinated contrast material: risk stratification by using estimated glomerular filtration rate. Radiology 268(3):719–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Davenport MS, Dillman JR, Cohan RH, Caoili EM, Ellis JH (2013) Contrast material-induced nephrotoxicity and intravenous low-osmolality iodinated contrast material. Radiology 267(1):94–105

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Murakami R, Hayashi H, Sugizaki KI, Yoshida T, Okazaki E, Kumita SI, Owan C (2012) Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing contrast-enhanced MDCT. Eur Radiol 22(10):2147–2152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The scientific guarantor of this publication is S. Bipat, Ph.D. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.The authors state that this work has not received any funding. One of the authors has significant statistical expertise. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was waived by the institutional review board. Methodology: prospective, performed at one institution

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shira I. Moos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moos, S.I., Stoker, J., Nagan, G. et al. Prediction of presence of kidney disease in a general patient population undergoing intravenous iodinated contrast enhanced computed tomography. Eur Radiol 24, 1266–1275 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3149-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3149-2

Keywords

Navigation