Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 23, Issue 12, pp 3485–3500 | Cite as

Acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy: ESUR recommendations

  • Gabriele Masselli
  • Lorenzo Derchi
  • Josephine McHugo
  • Andrea Rockall
  • Peter Vock
  • Michael Weston
  • John Spencer
  • ESUR Female Pelvic Imaging Subcommittee
Urogenital

Abstract

Acute abdominal pain in pregnancy presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Standard imaging techniques need to be adapted to reduce harm to the fetus from X-rays due to their teratogenic and carcinogenic potential. Ultrasound remains the primary imaging investigation of the pregnant abdomen. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be useful in the diagnosis of gynaecological and obstetric problems during pregnancy and in the setting of acute abdomen during pregnancy. MRI overcomes some of the limitations of ultrasound, mainly the size of the gravid uterus. MRI poses theoretical risks to the fetus and care must be taken to minimise these with the avoidance of contrast agents. This article reviews the evolving imaging and clinical literature on appropriate investigation of acute abdominal and pelvic pain during established intrauterine pregnancy, addressing its common causes. Guidelines based on the current literature and on the accumulated clinico-radiological experience of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) working group are proposed for imaging these suspected conditions.

Key Points

Ultrasound and MRI are the preferred investigations for abdominal pain during pregnancy.

Ultrasound remains the primary imaging investigation because of availability and portability.

MRI helps differentiate causes of abdominopelvic pain when ultrasound is inconclusive.

If MRI cannot be performed, low-dose CT may be necessary.

Following severe trauma, CT cannot be delayed because of radiation concerns.

Keywords

Acute abdominal pain Pregnancy Guidelines Ultrasound Magnetic resonance 

References

  1. 1.
    Sharp HT (2002) The acute abdomen during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45:405–413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cappell MS, Friedel D (2003) Abdominal pain during pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 32:1–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stone K (2002) Acute abdominal emergencies associated with pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45:553–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sharp HT (1994) Gastrointestinal surgical conditions during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 37:306–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kilpatrick CC, Monga M (2007) Approach to the acute abdomen in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 34:389–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kilpatrick CC, Orejuela FJ (2008) Management of the acute abdomen in pregnancy: a review. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 20:534–539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Augustin G, Majerovic M (2007) Non-obstetrical acute abdomen during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 131:4–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barloon TJ, Brown BP, Abu-Yousef MM et al (1995) Sonography of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Abdom Imaging 20:149–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C et al (2007) ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DL (2005) A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87:335–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaakaji Y, Nghiem HV, Nodell C et al (2000) Sonography of obstetric and gynecologic emergencies: Part I. Obstetric emergencies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:641–649CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Derchi LE, Serafini G, Gandolfo N, Gandolfo NG, Martinoli C (2011) Ultrasound in gynecology. Eur Radiol 11:2137–2155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pedrosa I, Rofsky NM (2003) MR imaging in abdominal emergencies. Radiol Clin N Am 41:1243–1273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Austin LM, Frush DP (2001) Compendium of national guidelines for imaging the pregnant patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W737–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katz DS, Klein MA, Ganson G, Hines JJ (2012) Imaging of abdominal pain in pregnancy. Radiol Clin North Am 50:149–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beddy P, Keogan MT, Sala E, Griffin N (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of acute abdominal pain in pregnancy. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 31:433–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oto A, Ernst RD, Ghulmiyyah LM et al (2009) MR imaging in the triage of pregnant patients with acute abdominal and pelvic pain. Abdom Imaging 34:243–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Birchard KR, Brown MA, Hyslop WB, Firat Z, Semelka RC (2005) MRI of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnant patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:452–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Masselli G, Brunelli R, Casciani E et al (2011) Acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy: MR imaging as a valuable adjunct to ultrasound? Abdom Imaging 36:596–603CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miller DL (2008) Safety assurance in obstetrical ultrasound. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 29:156–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C et al (2007) ACR Blue Ribbon Panel on MR Safety. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1447–1474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    American College of Radiology (2008) ACR practice guideline for imaging pregnant or potentially pregnant adolescents and women with ionizing radiation. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/dx/Pregnancy.aspx. Accessed 21 Feb 2010
  23. 23.
    DeWilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DL (2005) A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87:335–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huisman TA (2008) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Roentgenol 43:314–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hand JW, Li Y, Hajnal JV (2010) Numerical study of RF exposure and the resulting temperature rise in the foetus during a magnetic resonance procedure. Phys Med Biol 55:913–930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gowland PA, De Wilde J (2008) Temperature increase in the fetus due to radio frequency exposure during magnetic resonance scanning. Phys Med Biol 53:L15–L18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pugash D, Brugger PC, Bettelheim D, Prayer D (2008) Prenatal ultrasound and fetal MRI: the comparative value of each modality in prenatal diagnosis. Eur J Radiol 68:214–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yang L, Krefting I, Gorovets A et al (2012) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and class labeling of gadolinium-based contrast agents by the Food and Drug Administration. Radiology 265:248–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Webb JA, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK (2005) The use of iodinated and gadolinium contrast media during pregnancy and lactation. Eur Radiol 15:1234–1240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2009) ACOG committee opinion no. 299. Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 104:647–651Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Almén T et al (2013) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and gadolinium-based contrast media: updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol 23:307–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lazarus E, Mayo-Smith WW, Mainiero MB, Spencer PK (2007) CT in the evaluation of nontraumatic abdominal pain in pregnant women. Radiology 244:784–790CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sudah M, Vanninen RL, Partanen K et al (2002) Patients with acute flank pain: comparison of MR urography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 223:98–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Patel SJ, Reede DL, Katz DS, Subramaniam R, Amorosa JK (2007) Imaging the pregnant patient for nonobstetric conditions: algorithms and radiation dose considerations. Radiographics 27:1705–1722CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tremblay E, Thérasse E, Thomassin-Naggara I, Trop I (2012) Quality initiatives: guidelines for use of medical imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Radiographics 32:897–911CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bourjeily G, Chalhoub M, Phornphutkul C, Alleyne TC, Woodfield CA, Chen KK (2010) Neonatal thyroid function: effect of a single exposure to iodinated contrast medium in utero. Radiology 256:744–750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Francois KE, Foley MR (2010) Antepartum and postpartum hemorrhage. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL (eds) Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies, 5th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 458–462Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oyelese Y, Ananth CV (2006) Placental Abruption. Obstet Gynecol 108:1005–1016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nyberg DA, Cyr DR, Mack LA, Wilson DA, Shuman WP (1987) Sonographic spectrum of placental abruption. AJR Am J Roentgenol 148:161–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sholl S (1987) Abruptio placentae: clinical management in non acute cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:40–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Glantz C, Purnell L (2002) Clinical utility of sonography in the diagnosis and treatment of placental abruption. J Ultrasound Med 21:837–840PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jaffe MH, Schoen WC, Silver TM, Bowerman RA, Stuck KJ (1981) Sonography of abruptio placentae. AJR Am J Roentgenol 137:1049–1054CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yeo L, Ananth C, Vintzileos A (2004) Placenta abruption. In: Sciarra J (ed) Gynecology and obstetrics. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, HagerstownGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Harris RD, Cho C, Wells WA (1996) Sonography of the placenta with emphasis on pathological correlation. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 17:66–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Benedetti TJ, Cyr DR, Schuman WP (1987) Placental abruption and placental hemorrhage: correlation of sonographic findings with fetal outcome. Radiology 164:357–361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nguyen D, Nguyen C, Yacobozzi M, Bsat F, Rakita D (2012) Imaging of the Placenta with pathologic correlation. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 33:65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Masselli G, Brunelli R, Parasassi T, Perrone G, Gualdi G (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically stable late pregnancy bleeding: beyond ultrasound. Eur Radiol 21:1841–1849CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Masselli G, Brunelli R, Di Tola M, Anceschi M, Gualdi G (2011) MR imaging in the evaluation of placental abruption: correlation with sonographic findings. Radiology 259:222–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Atlas SW, Thulborn KR (2009) Intracranial hemorrhage. In: Atlas SW (ed) Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and of the spine, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 644–694Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wei SH, Helmy M, Cohen AJ (2009) CT evaluation of placental abruption in pregnant trauma patients. Emerg Radiol 16:365–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Khong TY (2008) The pathology of placenta accreta, a worldwide epidemic. J Clin Pathol 61:1243–1246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU (2005) Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1458–1461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wong HS, Hutton J, Zuccollo J, Tait J, Pringle KC (2008) Maternal outcome in placenta accreta: the significance of antenatal diagnosis and non-separation of placenta at delivery. N Z Med J 121:30–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Finberg HJ, Williams JW (1992) Placenta accreta: prospective sonographic diagnosis in patients with placenta previa and prior cesarean section. J Ultrasound Med 11:333–339PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Comstock CH, Love JJ, Bronsteen RA et al (2004) Sonographic detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:1135–1140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ito T, Katagiri C, Ikeno S, Takahashi H, Nagata N, Terakawa N (1999) Placenta previa increta penetrating the entire thickness of the uterine myometrium: ultrasonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 25:303–307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lerner JP, Deane S, Timor-Trisch IE (1995) Characterization of placenta accreta using transvaginal sonography and color Doppler imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 5:198–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Shih JC, Palacios JM, Su YN et al (2009) Role of three-dimensional power Doppler in the antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: comparison with gray-scale and color Doppler techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:193–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Derman AY, Nikac V, Haberman S, Zelenko N, Opsha O, Flyer M (2011) MRI of placenta accreta: a new imaging perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:1514–1521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Palacios Jaraquemada JM, Bruno CH (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging in 300 cases of placenta accreta: surgical correlation of new findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84:716–724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Warshak CR, Eskander R, Hull AD et al (2006) Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 108:573–581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lax A, Prince MR, Mennitt KW, Schwebach JR, Budorick NE (2007) The value of specific MRI features in the evaluation of suspected placental invasion. Magn Reson Imaging 25:87–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Masselli G, Brunelli R, Casciani E et al (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of placental adhesive disorders: correlation with color Doppler ultrasound. Eur Radiol 18:1292–1299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Levine D, Hulka CA, Ludmir J, Li W, Edelman RR (1997) Placenta accreta: evaluation with color Doppler US, power Doppler US, and MR imaging. Radiology 205:773–776PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Dwyer BK, Belogolovkin V, Tran L et al (2008) Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: sonography or magnetic resonance imaging? J Ultrasound Med 27:1275–1281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Baughman WC, Corteville JE, Shah RR (2008) Placenta accreta: spectrum of US and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 28:1905–1916CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Masselli G, Gualdi G (2013) MR imaging of the placenta: what a radiologist should know. Abdom Imaging 38:573–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Plauche W, Von Almen W, Muller R (1984) Catastrophic uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 64:792–793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ofir K, Eyal S, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M (2004) Uterine rupture: differences between a scarred and an unscarred uterus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:425–429Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Bedi DG, Solomon A, Winsett MZ, Fagan CJ, Kumar R (1986) Ruptured uterus: sonographic diagnosis. J Clin Ultrasound 14:529–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Omers R, Ulbrich R, Schauer A, Kuhn W (1988) Sonographic detection of an asymptomatic rupture of the uterus due to necrosis during the third trimester. Int J Gynecol Obstet 26:279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Vaknin Z, Maymon R, Mendlovic S, Barel O, Herman A, Sherman D (2008) Clinical, sonographic, and epidemiologic features of second- and early third-trimester spontaneous antepartum uterine rupture: a cohort study. Prenat Diagn 28:478–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Teunissen KK, Lopriore E, Nijman RGW, Brouwer PA, van Kamp IL (2007) Silent uterine rupture, an unusual cause of anhydramnios. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196:8–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Phillippe HJ, Nisand I (1996) Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet 347:281–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Cheung VY (2005) Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous Caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 27:674–681PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Gotoh H, Masuzaki H, Yoshida A, Yoshimura S, Miyamura T, Ishimaru T (2000) Predicting incomplete uterine rupture with vaginal sonography during the late second trimester in women with prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 95:596–600CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bergeron M-E, Jastrow N, Brassard N, Paris G, Bujold E (2009) Sonography of lower uterine segment thickness and prediction of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 113:520–522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Hasbargen U, Summerer-Moustaki M, Hillemanns P, Scheidler J, Kimmig R, Happ H (2002) Uterine dehiscence in a nullipara, diagnosed by MRI, following use of unipolar electrocautery during laparoscopic myomectomy. Hum Reprod 17:2180–2182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Hruska KM, Coughlin BF, Coggins AA, Wiczyk HP (2006) MRI diagnosis of spontaneous uterine rupture of an unscarred uterus. Emerg Radiol 12:186–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Roche O, Chavan N, Aquilina J, Rockall A (2012) Radiological appearances of gynaecological emergencies. Insights Imaging 3:265–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Chiang G, Levine D (2004) Imaging of adnexal masses in pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 23:805–819PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Bromley B, Benaccerraf B (1997) Adnexal masses during pregnancy: accuracy of sonographic diagnosis and outcome. J Ultrasound Med 16:447–452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ribic-Pucelj M, Kobal B, Peternelj-Marinsek S (2007) Surgical treatment of adnexal masses in pregnancy: indications, surgical approach and pregnancy outcome. J Reprod Med 52:273–279PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Lev-Toaff AS, Coleman BG, Arger PH et al (1987) Leiomyomas in pregnancy: sonographic study. Radiology 164:375–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Spencer JA, Forstner R, Cunha TM, Kinkel K (2010) ESUR guidelines for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an algorithmic approach. Eur Radiol 20:25–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Smorgick N, Pansky M, Feingold M et al (2009) The clinical characteristics and sonographic findings of maternal ovarian torsion in pregnancy. Fertil Steril 92:1983–1987CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Stark JE, Siegel MJ (1994) Ovarian torsion in prepubertal and pubertal girls: sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:1479–1482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Rosado WM Jr, Trambert MA, Gosink BB, Pretorius DH (1992) Adnexal torsion: diagnosis by using Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:1251–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Rha SE, Byun JY et al (2002) CT and MR imaging features of adnexal torsion. Radiographics 22:283–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Webb EM, Green GE, Scoutt LM (2004) Adnexal mass with pelvic pain. Radiol Clin North Am 42:329–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Kawakami S, Togashi K, Konishi I et al (1994) Red degeneration of uterine leiomyoma: MR appearance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18:925–928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Ueda H, Togashi K, Konishi I (1999) Unusual appearances of uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histopathologic backgrounds. Radiographics 19:131–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Andreoiu M, MacMahon R (2009) Renal colic in pregnancy: lithiasis or physiological hydronephrosis? Urology 74:758–761Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Shokeir AA, Mahran MR, Abdulmaaboud M (2000) Renal colic in pregnant women: role of renal resistive index. Urology 55:344–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Deyoe LA, Cronan JJ, Breslaw BH et al (1995) New techniques of ultrasound and color Doppler in the prospective evaluation of acute renal obstruction: do they replace the intravenous urogram? Abdom Imaging 20:58–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Wachsberg RH (1998) Unilateral absence of ureteral jets in the third trimester of pregnancy: pitfall in color Doppler US diagnosis of urinary obstruction. Radiology 209:279–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Lee JY, Kim SH, Cho JY, Han D (2001) Color and power Doppler twinkling artifacts from urinary stones: clinical observations and phantom studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:1441–1445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Deyoe LA, Cronan JJ, Breslaw BH, Ridlen MS (1995) New techniques of ultrasound and color Doppler in the prospective evaluation of acute renal obstruction: do they replace the intravenous urogram? Abdom Imaging 20:58–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Spencer JA, Chahal R, Kelly A, Taylor K, Eardley I, Lloyd SN (2004) Evaluation of painful hydronephrosis in pregnancy: magnetic resonance urographic patterns in physiological dilatation versus calculous obstruction. J Urol 171:156–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Roy C, Saussine C, Jahn C et al (1995) Fast imaging MR assessment of ureterohydronephrosis during pregnancy. Magn Reson Imaging 13:767–772CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Verswijvel G, Vandecaveye V, Gelin G et al (2002) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of renal infection: preliminary results. JBR-BTR 85:100–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    White WM, Zite NB, Gash J et al (2007) Low-dose computed tomography for the evaluation of flank pain in the pregnant population. J Endourol 21:1255–1260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Tamir IL, Bongard FS, Klein SR (1990) Acute appendicitis in the pregnant patient. Am J Surg 160:571–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Gilo NB, Amini D, Landy HJ (2009) Appendicitis and cholecystitis in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 52:586–596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Jeffrey RB, Jain KA, Nghiem HV (1994) Sonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis: interpretive pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:55–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS (1992) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:539–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P et al (2001) Outer diameter of the vermiform appendix as a sign of acute appendicitis: evaluation at US. Radiology 218:757–762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Israel GM, Malguria N, McCarthy S et al (2008) MRI vs. ultrasound for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:428–433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh AD, Siewert B, Ngo L, Rofsky NM (2006) MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology 238:891–899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Pedrosa I, Lafornara M, Pandharipande PV et al (2009) Pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate. Radiology 250:749–757CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Cobben LP, Groot I, Haans L, Blickman JG, Puylaert J (2004) MRI for clinically suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:671–675CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Pedrosa I, Zeikus EA, Levine D et al (2007) MR imaging of acute right lower quadrant pain in pregnant patients and nonpregnant patients. Radiographics 27:721–753CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Singh AK, Desai H, Novelline RA (2009) Emergency MRI of acute pelvic pain: MR protocol with no oral contrast. Emerg Radiol 16:133–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Masselli G, Brizi MG, Menchini L, Minordi L, Vecchioli Scaldazza A (2005) Magnetic Resonance Enteroclysis imaging of Crohn’s. Radiol Med 110:221–233Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    McKenna DA, Meehan CP, Alhajeri AN, Regan MC, O’Keeffe DP (2007) The use of MRI to demonstrate small bowel obstruction during pregnancy. Br J Radiol 80:e11–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Masselli G, Gualdi G (2012) MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology 264:333–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Lu EJ, Curet MJ, El-Sayed YY et al (2004) Medical versus surgical management of biliary tract disease in pregnancy. Am J Surg 188:755–759CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Ralls PW, Colletti PM, Lapin SA et al (1985) Real-time sonography in suspected acute cholecystitis: prospective evaluation of primary and secondary signs. Radiology 155:767–771PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Simeone JF, Brink JA, Mueller PR et al (1989) The sonographic diagnosis of acute gangrenous cholecystitis: importance of the Murphy sign. AJR Am J Roentgenol 152:289–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Oto A, Ernst R, Ghulmiyyah L et al (2009) The role of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of pregnant patients with acute pancreaticobiliary disease. Br J Radiol 82:279–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Tang SJ, Mayo MJ, Rodriguez-Frias E et al (2009) Safety and utility of ERCP during pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc 69:453–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Barton JR, Sibai BM (1996) Hepatic imaging in HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count). Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:1820–1825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Castro MA, Ouzounian JG, Colletti PM, Shaw KJ, Stein SM, Goodwin TM (1996) Radiologic studies in acute fatty liver of pregnancy. A review of the literature and 19 new cases. J Reprod Med 41:839–844PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Wei Q, Li Z, Liu X (2010) Clinical diagnosis and treatment of acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a literature review and 11 new cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 36:751–756CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Usta IM, Barton JR, Amon EA, Gonzalez A, Sibai BM (1994) Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: an experience in the diagnosis and management of fourteen cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:1342–1347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Campillo B, Bernuau J, Witz MO et al (1986) Ultrasonography in acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 105:383–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Van Le L, Podrasky A (1990) Computed tomographic and ultrasonographic findings in women with acute fatty liver of pregnancy. J Reprod Med 35:815–817PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Mabie W, Dacus J, Sibai BM, Morretti ML, Gold RE (1988) Computed tomography in acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158:142–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Farine D, Newhouse J, Owen J, Fox HE (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scan for the diagnosis of acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 7:316–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Shah KH, Simons RK, Holbrook T et al (1998) Trauma in pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes. J Trauma 45:83–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Connolly AM, Katz VL, Bash KL et al (1997) Trauma and pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 14:331–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Sadro C, Bernstein MP, Kanal KM (2012) Imaging of trauma: part 2, abdominal trauma and pregnancy – a radiologist's guide to doing what is best for the mother and baby. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:1207–1211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriele Masselli
    • 1
    • 7
  • Lorenzo Derchi
    • 2
  • Josephine McHugo
    • 3
  • Andrea Rockall
    • 4
  • Peter Vock
    • 5
  • Michael Weston
    • 6
  • John Spencer
    • 6
  • ESUR Female Pelvic Imaging Subcommittee
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyPoliclinico Umberto I. Sapienza University RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of RadiologySan Martino Hospital, University of GenovaGenovaItaly
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyBirmingham Women’s HospitalBirminghamUK
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyImperial College LondonLondonUK
  5. 5.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyInselspital BernBernSwitzerland
  6. 6.Department of RadiologySt James’s University HospitalLeedsEngland
  7. 7.First Faculty of Medicine, Radiology DepartmentUniversità di Roma SapienzaRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations