Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 23, Issue 7, pp 1822–1828 | Cite as

Prospectively ECG-triggered sequential dual-source coronary CT angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison with retrospectively ECG-gated helical CT

  • Lei Xu
  • Lin Yang
  • Zhaoqi ZhangEmail author
  • Yining Wang
  • Zhengyu Jin
  • Longjiang Zhang
  • Guangming Lu
Cardiac

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the feasibility of applying prospectively ECG-triggered sequential coronary CT angiography (CCTA) to patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and evaluate the image quality and radiation dose compared with a retrospectively ECG-gated helical protocol.

Methods

100 patients with persistent AF were enrolled. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to a prospective protocol and the other patients to a retrospective protocol using a second-generation dual-source CT (DS-CT). Image quality was evaluated using a four-point grading scale (1 = excellent, 2 = good, 3 = moderate, 4 = poor) by two reviewers on a per-segment basis. The coronary artery segments were considered non-diagnostic with a quality score of 4. The radiation dose was evaluated.

Results

Diagnostic segment rate in the prospective group was 99.4 % (642/646 segments), while that in the retrospective group was 96.5 % (604/626 segments) (P < 0.001). Effective dose was 4.29 ± 1.86 and 11.95 ± 5.34 mSv for each of the two protocols (P < 0.001), which was a 64 % reduction in the radiation dose for prospective sequential imaging compared with retrospective helical imaging.

Conclusion

In AF patients, prospectively ECG-triggered sequential CCTA is feasible using second-generation DS-CT and can decrease >60 % radiation exposure compared with retrospectively ECG-gated helical imaging while improving diagnostic image quality.

Key Points

Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) can be difficult in patients with arrhythmias.

Prospectively ECG-triggered sequential CCTA is feasible in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Prospective sequential imaging can improve quality compared with retrospective analysis.

Prospective sequential imaging decreases radiation exposure by 64 % compared with retrospective mode.

Keywords

Dual-source CT Coronary arteries Image quality Radiation dose Atrial fibrillation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by a grant for Excellent Talents from Beijing city (2001D003034000030) and the International Collaboration Program from the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (2010DFB30040).

References

  1. 1.
    Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359:2324–2336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724–1732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Busch S et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invest Radiol 42:684–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vanhoenacker PK, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Van Heste R et al (2007) Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. Radiology 244:419–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heuschmid M, Kuettner A, Schroeder S et al (2005) ECG gated 16-MDCT of the coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and accuracy in detecting stenoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1413–1419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 16:575–582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun Z, Jiang W (2006) Diagnostic value of multislice computed tomography angiography in coronary artery disease: a meta analysis. Eur J Radiol 60:279–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chatap G, Giraud K, Vincent JP (2002) Atrial fibrillation in the elderly: facts and management. Drugs Aging 19:819–846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peters NS, Schilling RJ, Kanagaratnam P, Markides V (2002) Atrial fibrillation: strategies to control, combat, and cure. Lancet 359:593–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS et al (2006) ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 114:e257–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang L, Zhang Z, Fan Z et al (2009) 64-MDCT coronary angiography of patients with atrial fibrillation: influence of heart rate on image quality and efficacy in evaluation of coronary artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:795–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rist C, Johnson TR, Müller-Starck J et al (2009) Noninvasive coronary angiography using dual-source computed tomography in patients with atrial fibrillation. Invest Radiol 44:159–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A (2007) Effectiveness of dual-source CT coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. Radiology 245:703–711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsiflikas I et al (2008) Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 247:346–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee AM, Engel L-C, Shah B et al (2012) Coronary computed tomography angiography during arrhythmia: Radiation dose reduction with prospectively ECG-triggered axial and retrospectively ECG-gated helical 128-slice dual-source CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6:172–183.e2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography et al (2009) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:122–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 248:431–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Halliburton SS, Abbara S, Chen MY, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography et al (2011) SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:198–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Landis JR, Koch GG (1997) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nissen SE (2008) Limitations of computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2145–2147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S (2007) Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298:317–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Klass O, Jeltsch M, Feuerlein S et al (2009) Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: preliminary experiences with a novel low-dose technique. Eur Radiol 19:829–836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H et al (2008) Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 249:71–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang Y, Zhang Z, Kong L et al (2008) Dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison with single-source CT. Eur J Radiol 68:434–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weustink AC, Mollet NR, Pugliese F et al (2008) Optimal electrocardiographic pulsing windows and heart rate: effect on image quality and radiation exposure at dual-source coronary CT angiography. Radiology 248:792–798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lei Xu
    • 1
  • Lin Yang
    • 1
  • Zhaoqi Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yining Wang
    • 2
  • Zhengyu Jin
    • 2
  • Longjiang Zhang
    • 3
  • Guangming Lu
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College HospitalChinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of Medical Imaging, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical CollegeNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations