Post-mortem computed tomography compared to forensic autopsy findings: a French experience
- 1.2k Downloads
The principal aim of our study was to establish concordance between post-mortem CT (PMCT) and forensic standard autopsy (SA) in detecting lesions according to different anatomical regions. A secondary aim was to determine the efficacy of PMCT in showing lethal lesions.
PMCTs were compared with autopsies in 236 cadavers in different contexts of death. PMCT findings were assessed by two independent radiologists.
Concordance between PMCT and autopsy was almost perfect in showing skull, basal skull and hyoid bone fractures as well as in detecting facial, vertebral or pelvic fractures. Both examinations were discordant in demonstrating some intracranial injuries, vascular or organ wounds (more findings showed by autopsy), as well in showing free air in anatomical cavities (more findings detected by PMCT). Moreover, PMCT was effective in determining lethal lesions in the context of craniofacial trauma or after a gunshot wound. Concordance between the findings of the two radiologists was almost perfect for each type of lesion.
PMCT could be considered as effective as SA in determining the cause of death in certain traumatic events. It was also effective in showing lethal lesions and could be a useful tool in reducing the number of SA.
• Post-mortem CT is increasingly performed as an alternative/adjunct to formal autopsy.
• More modern CT systems provide greater anatomical scope.
• PMCT can usually determine the cause of most deaths following trauma.
• Prospective studies are still required to establish an algorithm for forensic CT.
KeywordsPost-mortem CT Autopsy Cause of death Prospective studies Diagnostic tool
The authors are most grateful to Richard Medeiros, Rouen University Hospital Medical Editor, for his valuable editing of the manuscript.
- 2.Roberts ISD, Benamore RE, Benbow EW, Lee S, Harris JN, Jackson A, Mallett S, Patankar T, Pebbles C, Roobottom C, Traill Z (2011) Postmortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet 22:1–7Google Scholar
- 8.Saukko P, Knight B (2004) The pathophysiology of death. In: Knight’s forensic pathology, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 52–97Google Scholar
- 18.Grabherr S, Doenz F, Steger B, Dirnhoher R, Dominguez A, Sollberger B, Gygax E, Rizzo E, Chevallier C, Meuli R, Mangin P (2012) Multi-phase post-mortem CT angiography: development of a standardized protocol. Int J Legal Med 25:791–802Google Scholar
- 21.Takahashi N, Higuchi T, Shiotani M, Hirose Y, Shibuya H, Yamammouchi H, Hashidate H, Funayama K (2012) The effectiveness of postmortem multidetector computed tomography in the detection of fatal findings related to cause of non-traumatic death in the emergency department. Eur Radiol 22:152–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.DiMaio VJ, DiMaio D (2001) Death by drowning. In: Forensic pathology, 2nd edn. CRC, New York, pp 416–422Google Scholar