Abstract
Objective
A new technology is introduced that enables real-time 4D (three spatial dimensions plus time) X-ray guidance for vascular catheter interventions with acceptable levels of ionising radiation.
Methods
The enabling technology is a combination of low-dose tomographic data acquisition with novel compressed sensing reconstruction and use of prior image information. It was implemented in a prototype set-up consisting of a gantry-based flat detector system. In pigs (n = 5) angiographic interventions were simulated. Radiation dosage on a per time base was compared with the “gold standard” of X-ray projection imaging.
Results
Contrary to current image guidance methods that lack permanent 4D updates, the spatial position of interventional instruments could be resolved in continuous, spatial 4D guidance; the movement of the guide wire as well as the expansion of stents could be precisely tracked in 3D angiographic road maps. Dose rate was 23.8 μGy/s, similar to biplane standard angiographic fluoroscopy, which has a dose rate of 20.6 μGy/s.
Conclusion
Real-time 4D X-ray image-guidance with acceptable levels of radiation has great potential to significantly influence the field of minimally invasive medicine by allowing faster and safer interventions and by enabling novel, much more complex procedures for vascular and oncological minimally invasive therapy.
Key Points
• Real-time 4D (three spatial dimensions plus time) angiographic intervention guidance is realistic.
• Low-dose tomographic data acquisition with special compressed sensing-based algorithms is enabled.
• Compared with 4D CT fluoroscopy, this method reduces radiation to acceptable levels.
• Once implemented, vascular interventions may become safer and faster.
• More complex intervention approaches may be developed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rodés-Cabau J (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches. Nat Rev Cardiol 9:15–29
Bock M, Wacker FK (2008) MR-guided intravascular interventions: techniques and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:326–338
Schirra CO, Weiss S, Krueger S, Pedersen SF, Razavi R, Schaeffter T, Kozerke S (2009) Toward true 3D visualization of active catheters using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med 62:341–347
Tang J, Hsieh J, Chen G-H (2010) Temporal resolution improvement in cardiac CT using PICCS (TRI-PICCS): performance studies. Med Phys 37:4377–4388
Carlson SK, Bender CE, Classic KL, Zink FE, Quam JP, Ward EM, Oberg AL (2001) Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures. Radiology 219:515–520
Racadio JM, Babic D, Homan R, Rampton JW, Patel MN, Racadio JM, Johnson ND (2007) Live 3D guidance in the interventional radiology suite. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W357–W364
Schulz B, Eichler K, Siebenhandl P, Gruber-Rouh T, Czerny C, Vogl TJ, Zangos S (2012) Accuracy and speed of robotic assisted needle interventions using a modern cone beam computed tomography intervention suite: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 23:198-204
Kroeze SGC, Huisman M, Verkooijen HM, van Diest PJ, Ruud Bosch JLH, van den Bosch MAAJ (2012) Real-time 3D fluoroscopy-guided large core needle biopsy of renal masses: a critical early evaluation according to the IDEAL recommendations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:680–685
Mistretta CA (2011) Sub-nyquist acquisition and constrained reconstruction in time resolved angiography. Med Phys 38:2975–2985
Neeman Z, Dromi SA, Sarin S, Wood BJ (2006) CT fluoroscopy shielding: decreases in scattered radiation for the patient and operator. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:1999–2004
Donoho DL (2006) Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 52:1289–1306
Chen G-H, Tang J, Leng S (2008) Prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS): a method to accurately reconstruct dynamic CT images from highly undersampled projection data sets. Med Phys 35:660–663
Tang J, Nett BE, Chen G-H (2009) Performance comparison between total variation (TV)-based compressed sensing and statistical iterative reconstruction algorithms. Phys Med Biol 54:5781–5804
Pan X, Sidky EY, Vannier M (2009) Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction? Inverse Probl 25:1230009
Ritschl L, Bergner F, Fleischmann C, Kachelriess M (2011) Improved total variation-based CT image reconstruction applied to clinical data. Phys Med Biol 56:1545–1561
Chen G-H, Tang J, Nett B, Qi Z, Leng S, Szczykutowicz T (2010) Prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS) and applications in X-ray computed tomography. Curr Med Imaging Rev 2:119–134
Chen GH, Tang J, Leng S (2008) Prior Image Constrained Compressed SEnsing (PICCS). Proc Soc Photo Opt Instrum Eng 6856:685618
Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW (1984) Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am 1:612–619
McKinnon GC, Bates RH (1981) Towards imaging the beating heart usefully with a conventional CT scanner. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 28:123–127
Sidky EY, Pan X, Reiser IS, Nishikawa RM, Moore RH, Kopans DB (2009) Enhanced imaging of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis through improved image-reconstruction algorithms. Med Phys 36:4920–4932
Candes EJ, Plan Y (2011) A probabilistic and RIPless theory of compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 57:7235–7254
Gupta R, Grasruck M, Suess C, Bartling SH, Schmidt B, Stierstorfer K, Popescu S, Brady T, Flohr T (2006) Ultra-high resolution flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, design architecture, and system characterization. Eur Radiol 16:1191–1205
Grasruck M, Suess C, Stierstorfer K, Popescu S, Flohr T (2005) Evaluation of image quality and dose on a flat-panel CT-scanner. Proc SPIE 5745:179–188
McNitt-Gray MF (2002) AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. Radiographics 22:1541–1553
Kachelriess M, Knaup M, Bockenbach O (2007) Hyperfast parallel-beam and cone-beam backprojection using the cell general purpose hardware. Med Phys 34:1474–1486
Acknowledgements
The research is funded by DFG (German Research Foundation) grant (KA 1678/6-1 and BA 3546/2-1) and Siemens Healthcare. We acknowledge Stefan Sawall’s support in the creation of the reconstruction algorithm and his contribution to the discussion of the methodology. We thank Dr. Michaela Socher and Roland Galmbacher for animal handling. Furthermore, we would like to acknowledge Barbara Flach and Rolf Kueres for help during experimental set-ups and discussion of future developments. We would like to thank Dr. Michael Grasruck, Dr. Andreas Maier and Dr. Yiannis Kyriakou for extensive help with the experimental set-up, as well as discussion of applications, clinical implementation and future developments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary video 1
Example of 4D intervention guidance of a guide wire in the right carotid artery of a full sized pig using colour-coded volume rendering. First the bent guide wire is visible in the external carotid artery, from which it is retracted into the common carotid artery. Here the guide wire tip is placed in front of the ostium of the ascending pharyngeal artery, into which it is then advanced. At all times the spatial position of the guide wire as well as its tip was clear (MPEG 880 kb)
Supplementary video 2
A movie of an unfolding stent protruding from the common carotid artery of a pig into the external carotid artery is shown. A volume rendering technique is used (MPEG 152 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuntz, J., Gupta, R., Schönberg, S.O. et al. Real-time X-ray-based 4D image guidance of minimally invasive interventions. Eur Radiol 23, 1669–1677 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2761-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2761-2