Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Malignant versus benign mediastinal lesions: quantitative assessment with diffusion weighted MR imaging

  • Chest
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating malignant from benign mediastinal lesions.

Methods

Fifty-three mediastinal lesions were examined with T1- and T2-weighted (W) conventional images. Then, two diffusion-weighted images were obtained with b = 0 and 1000 s/mm² values and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) were calculated. The statistical significance of differences between measurements was tested using the Student-t test.

Results

The mean ADC of malignant lesions was significantly lower than that of the benign masses (p < 0.001). The cut-off value of ≤ 1.39 × 10−3 mm²/s indicated a malignant lesion with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 87%.

Conclusion

Diffusion-weighted imaging may be helpful in differentiating benign from malignant mediastinal masses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laurent F, Latrabe V, Lecesne R, Zennaro H, Airaud JY, Rauturier JF, Drouillard J (1998) Mediastinal masses: diagnostic approach. Eur Radiol 8:1148–1159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Strollo DC, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Jett JR (1997) Primary mediastinal tumors: part 1: Tumors of the anterior mediastinum. Chest 112:511–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Strollo DC, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Jett JR (1997) Primary mediastinal tumors: part II. Tumors of the middle and posterior mediastinum. Chest 112:1344–1357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitten CR, Khan S, Munneke GJ, Grubnic S (2007) A diagnostic approach to mediastinal abnormalities. Radiographics 27:657–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tomiyama N, Honda O, Tsubamoto M, Inoue A, Sumikawa H, Kuriyama K, Kusumoto M, Johkoh T, Nakamura H (2009) Anterior mediastinal tumors: diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI. Eur J Radiol 69:280–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahn JM, Lee KS, Goo JM, Song KS, Kim SJ, Im JG (1996) Predicting the histology of anterior mediastinal masses: comparison of chest radiography and CT. J Thorac Imaging 11:265–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawashima A, Fishman EK, Kuhlman JE, Nixon MS (1991) CT of posterior mediastinal masses. Radiographics 11:1045–1067

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Puderbach M, Hintze C, Ley S, Eichinger M, Kauczor HU, Biederer JMR (2007) Imaging of the chest: a practical approach at 1.5 T. Eur J Radiol 64:345–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kauczor HU, Kreitner KF (2000) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the lung. Eur J Radiol 34:196–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanaka R, Horikoshi H, Nakazato Y, Seki E, Minato K, Iijima M, Kojima M, Goya T (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging in peripheral lung adenocarcinoma correlation with histopathologic features. J Thorac Imaging 24:4–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohno Y, Sugimura K, Hatabu H (2002) MR imaging of lung cancer. Eur J Radiol 44:172–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdel Razek A, Elmorsy A, Elshafey M, Elhadedy T, Hamza O (2009) Assessment of mediastinal tumors with diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:535–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu H, Liu Y, Yu T, Ye N (2010) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of pulmonary lesions. Eur J Radiol 20:807–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mori T, Nomori H, Ikeda K (2008) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing malignant pulmonary nodules/masses. Comparison with positron emission tomography. J Thorac Oncol 3:358–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matoba M, Tonami H, Kondou T, Yokota H, Higashi K, Toga H, Sakuma T (2007) Lung carcinoma: diffusion weighted MR imaging—Preliminary evaluation with apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology 243:570–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Uto T, Takehara Y, Nakamura Y, Naito T, Hashimoto D, Inui N, Suda T, Nakamura H, Chida K (2009) Higher sensitivity and specificity for diffusion weighted imaging of malignant lung lesions without apparent diffusion coefficient quantification. Radiology 252:247–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Satoh S, Kitazume Y, Ohdama S, Kimula Y, Taura S, Endo Y (2008) Can malignant and benign pulmonary nodules be differentiated with diffusion-weighted MRI? AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:464–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Qi LP, Zhang XP, Tang T, Li J, Sun YS, Zhu GY (2010) Using diffusion-weighted MR imaging for tumor detection in the collapsed lung: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol 19:333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakayama J, Miyasaka K, Omatsu T, Onodera Y, Terae S, Matsuna Y, Cho Y (2010) Metastases in mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: quantitative assessment with diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kosucu P, Tekinbas C, Erol M, Sarı A, Kavgacı H, Öztuna F, Ersöz Ş (2009) Mediastinal lymphnodes:assessment with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:292–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sevtap Gümüştaş.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gümüştaş, S., İnan, N., Sarisoy, H.T. et al. Malignant versus benign mediastinal lesions: quantitative assessment with diffusion weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 21, 2255–2260 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2180-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2180-9

Keywords

Navigation