Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer: potential utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values as a biomarker to predict clinical aggressiveness

  • Magnetic REsonance
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in bladder cancer and the potential role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in predicting pathological bladder cancer phenotypes associated with clinical aggressiveness were investigated.

Methods

One hundred and four bladder cancer patients underwent DW-MRI and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (T2W-MRI) before transurethral resection. The image sets were reviewed by two independent radiologists. ADC values were measured in 121 eligible tumours.

Results

In detecting patients with bladder cancer, DW-MRI exhibited high sensitivity equivalent to that of T2W-MRI (>90%). Interobserver agreement was excellent for DW-MRI (κ score, 0.88) though moderate for T2W-MRI (0.67). ADC values were significantly lower in high-grade (vs. low-grade, P < 0.0001) and high-stage (T2 vs. T1 vs. Ta, P < 0.0001) tumours. At a cut-off ADC value determined by partition analysis, clinically aggressive phenotypes including muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and high-grade T1 disease were differentiated from less aggressive phenotypes with a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 85% and an accuracy of 87%.

Conclusion

DW-MRI exhibits high diagnostic performance in bladder cancer with excellent objectivity. The ADC value could potentially serve as a biomarker to predict clinical aggressiveness in bladder cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, Newling DW, Kurth K (2006) Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 49:466–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thalmann GN, Markwalder R, Shahin O, Burkhard FC, Hochreiter WW, Studer UE (2004) Primary T1G3 bladder cancer: organ preserving approach or immediate cystectomy? J Urol 172:70–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Malkowicz SB, van Poppel H, Mickisch G, Pansadoro V, Thüroff J, Soloway MS, Chang S, Benson M, Fukui I (2007) Muscle-invasive Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Urology 69(1 Suppl):3–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dalbagni G, Genega E, Hashibe M, Zhang ZF, Russo P, Herr H, Reuter V (2001) Cystectomy for bladder cancer: a contemporary series. J Urol 165:1111–1116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, Groshen S, Feng AC, Boyd S, Skinner E, Bochner B, Thangathurai D, Mikhail M, Raghavan D, Skinner DG (2001) Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 19:666–675

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jakse G, Algaba F, Malmström PU, Oosterlinck W (2004) A second-look TUR in T1 transitional cell carcinoma: why? Eur Urol 45:539–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miladi M, Peyromaure M, Zerbib M, Saïghi D, Debré B (2003) The value of a second transurethral resection in evaluating patients with bladder tumours. Eur Urol 43:241–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mukherji SK, Chenevert TL, Castillo M (2002) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Neuroophthalmol 22:118–122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bammer R (2003) Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol 45:169–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alavi A, Lakhani P, Mavi A, Kung JW, Zhuang H (2004) PET: a revolution in medical imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 42:983–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, Chenevert TL, Thoeny HC, Takahara T, Dzik-Jurasz A, Ross BD, Van Cauteren M, Collins D, Hammoud DA, Rustin GJ, Taouli B, Choyke PL (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11:102–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shinya S, Sasaki T, Nakagawa Y, Guiquing Z, Yamamoto F, Yamashita Y (2007) The usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the detection of gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 54:1378–1381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Sumi S, Tang Y, Takahashi M (1997) Focal liver masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 204:739–744

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibbs P, Pickles MD, Turnbull LW (2006) Diffusion imaging of the prostate at 3.0 tesla. Invest Radiol 41:185–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cova M, Squillaci E, Stacul F, Manenti G, Gava S, Simonetti G, Pozzi-Mucelli R (2004) Diffusion-weighted MRI in the evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary results. Br J Radiol 77:851–857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshida S, Masuda H, Ishii C, Saito K, Kawakami S, Kihara K (2008) Initial experience of functional imaging of upper urinary tract neoplasm by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Urol 15:140–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Takeuchi M, Sasaki S, Ito M, Okada S, Takahashi S, Kawai T, Suzuki K, Oshima H, Hara M, Shibamoto Y (2009) Urinary bladder cancer: diffusion-weighted MR imaging—accuracy for diagnosing T stage and estimating histologic grade. Radiology 251:112–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Watanabe H, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Goshima S, Tsuge Y, Onozuka M, Moriyama N (2009) Preoperative T staging of urinary bladder cancer: does diffusion-weighted MRI have supplementary value? AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1361–1366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. El-Assmy A, Abou-El-Ghar ME, Mosbah A, El-Nahas AR, Refaie HF, Hekal IA, El-Diasty T, Ibrahiem el H (2009) Bladder tumour staging: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 19:1575–1581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matsuki M, Inada Y, Tatsugami F, Tanikake M, Narabayashi I, Katsuoka Y (2007) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for urinary bladder carcinoma: initial results. Eur Radiol 17:201–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kiliçkesmez O, Cimilli T, Inci E, Kayhan A, Bayramoğlu S, Taşdelen N, Gürmen N (2009) Diffusion-weighted MRI of urinary bladder and prostate cancers. Diagn Interv Radiol 15:104–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Abou-El-Ghar ME, El-Assmy A, Refaie HF, El-Diasty T (2009) Bladder cancer: diagnosis with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with gross hematuria. Radiology 251:415–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoshida S, Koga F, Kawakami S, Ishii C, Tanaka H, Numao N, Sakai Y, Saito K, Masuda H, Fujii Y, Kihara K (2010) Initial experience of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to assess therapeutic response to induction chemoradiotherapy against muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urology 75:387–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Torti FM, Lum BL, Aston D, MacKenzie N, Faysel M, Shortliffe LD, Freiha F (1987) Superficial bladder cancer: the primacy of grade in the development of invasive disease. J Clin Oncol 5:125–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fisher MR, Hricak H, Tanagho EA (1985) Urinary bladder MR imaging. Part II. Neoplasm. Radiology 157:471–477

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rholl KS, Lee JK, Heiken JP, Ling D, Glazer HS (1987) Primary bladder carcinoma: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 163:117–121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Buy JN, Moss AA, Guinet C, Ghossain MA, Malbec L, Arrive L, Vadrot D (1988) MR staging of bladder carcinoma: correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 169:695–700

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Epstein JI (2003) The new World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) classification for TA, T1 bladder tumors: is it an improvement? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 47:83–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch (2002) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 6th edn. Wiley-Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kibel AS, Dehdashti F, Katz MD, Klim AP, Grubb RL, Humphrey PA, Siegel C, Cao D, Gao F, Siegel BA (2009) Prospective study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging of muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 27:4314–4320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jadvar H, Quan V, Henderson RW, Conti PS (2008) [F-18]-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET and PET-CT in diagnostic imaging evaluation of locally recurrent and metastatic bladder transitional cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol 13:42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Drieskens O, Oyen R, Van Poppel H, Vankan Y, Flamen P, Mortelmans L (2005) FDG-PET for preoperative staging of bladder cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32:1412–1417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Koga F, Yoshida S, Kawakami S, Kageyama Y, Yokoyama M, Saito K, Fujii Y, Kobayashi T, Kihara K (2008) Low-dose chemoradiotherapy followed by partial or radical cystectomy against muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an intent-to-treat survival analysis. Urology 72:384–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sasaki M, Yamada K, Watanabe Y, Matsui M, Ida M, Fujiwara S, Shibata E, Acute Stroke Imaging Standardization Group-Japan (ASIST-Japan) Investigators (2008) Variability in absolute apparent diffusion coefficient values across different platforms may be substantial: a multivendor, multi-institutional comparison study. Radiology 249:624–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumitaka Koga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kobayashi, S., Koga, F., Yoshida, S. et al. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer: potential utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values as a biomarker to predict clinical aggressiveness. Eur Radiol 21, 2178–2186 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2174-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2174-7

Keywords

Navigation