Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Facet joint injections as a means of reducing the need for vertebroplasty in insufficiency fractures of the spine

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Recent publications compared treatment of vertebral fractures reporting improvement in the majority but with no significant difference between the local anaesthetic and vertebroplasty groups. Potential explanations include placebo response or therapeutic response to the “control procedure”. We investigated whether preliminary facet joint injection can identify those patients whose pain arises from paravertebral structures rather than the vertebral insufficiency fracture itself.

Methods

Patients referred for treatment by vertebroplasty were first offered local anaesthetic and steroid facet joint injection (FJI) at the most painful level. Those who failed to respond were offered a vertebroplasty.

Results

Ninety one patients referred, 16 went straight to vertebroplasty. Sixty one of 75 were initially offered FJI. Twenty one were successful; two relapsed, had further FJIs with good results; three declined treatment; 5 had temporary benefit; 1 died from unrelated causes. Of 29 who failed to respond to FJIs, 24 underwent vertebroplasty and 23 had a successful outcome.

Conclusions

A third of patients technically suitable for vertebroplasty responded beneficially to FJI. In this group the pain mediator maybe one of instability and overload on the facet joints produced by adjacent wedge fracture. This protocol allows more selective and more successful vertebroplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tran Thang NN, Abdo G, Martin JB et al (2008) Percutaneous cementoplasty in multiple myeloma: a valuable adjunct for pain control and ambulation maintenance. Support Care Cancer 16:891–896. doi:10.1007/s00520-007-0344-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang Z, Yang D, Xie L et al (2009) Treatment of metastatic spinal tumors by percutaneous vertebroplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with interstitial implantation of 125I seeds. Acta Radiol 50:1142–1148. doi:10.3109/02841850903229133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, Le Gars D (1987) Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie 33:166–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Franc J, Lehmann P, Saliou G et al (2010) Vertebroplasty: 10 years clinical and radiological follow-up. J Neuroradiol 37:211–219. doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2009.10.004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rami PM, McGraw JK, Heatwole EV, Boorstein JM (2002) Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of vertebral body compression fracture secondary to osteogenesis imperfecta. Skeletal Radiol 31:162–165. doi:10.1007/s00256-001-0448-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Acosta FL Jr, Sanai N, Chi JH et al (2008) Comprehensive management of symptomatic and aggressive vertebral hemangiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 19:17–29. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2007.09.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerszten PC, Monaco EA 3rd (2009) Complete percutaneous treatment of vertebral body tumors causing spinal canal compromise using a transpedicular cavitation, cement augmentation, and radiosurgical technique. Neurosurg Focus 27:E9. doi:10.3171/2009.9.FOCUS09184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wardlaw D, Cummings SR, Van Meirhaeghe J et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 373:1016–1024. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60010-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rotter R, Martin H, Fuerderer S et al (2010) Vertebral body stenting: a new method for vertebral augmentation versus kyphoplasty. Eur Spine J 19:916–923. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1341-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deramond H, Depriester C, Toussaint P, Galibert P (1997) Percutaneous vertebroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 1:285–296. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1080150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ et al (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 361:569–579. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0900563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR et al (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 361:557–568. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0900429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Wilson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, D.J., Owen, S. & Corkill, R.A. Facet joint injections as a means of reducing the need for vertebroplasty in insufficiency fractures of the spine. Eur Radiol 21, 1772–1778 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2115-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2115-5

Keywords

Navigation