Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improved liver lesion conspicuity by increasing the flip angle during hepatocyte phase MR imaging

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

One of the advantages of using hepatobiliary contrast agents in liver MRI is the ability to acquire a delayed, “hepatocyte phase” dataset. This phase highlights many types of lesions as hypointense compared with the liver, because of the accumulation of contrast material in functioning hepatocytes and non-retention within most lesions.

Method

Increasing the flip angle of the T1-weighted pulse sequence used to acquire the hepatocyte phase is a simple parameter change that increases the contrast-to-noise ratio of focal lesions compared with the hepatic parenchyma.

Result

This technique increases the sensitivity for detection and conspicuity of focal liver lesions.

Conclusion

High flip angle delayed hepatocyte phase imaging is a useful adjunct to standard enhanced MRI of the liver. It allows for better sensitivity in focal lesion detection, particularly for small lesions. Secondarily, this technique increases the conspicuity of the biliary system, which is an additional benefit of delayed imaging with hepatobiliary contrast agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim YK, Lee YH, Kwak HS, Kim CS, Han YM (2010) Detection of liver metastases: gadoxetic acid-enhanced three-dimensional MR imaging versus ferucarbotran-enhanced MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 73:131–136. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Frericks BB, Loddenkemper C, Huppertz A et al (2009) Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhotic liver enhancement using Gd-EOB-DTPA. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1053–1060. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.1946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagle S, Busse, RF, Brau, AC, Brittain, JH, Iwadate, Y, Meisamy, S, Zeng, YG, Reeder, SB (2009) High-Resolution Free-Breathing 3D T1 Weighted Hepatobiliary Imaging Optimized for Gd-EOB-DTPA(ed)^(eds) ISMRM 17th Annual Meeting and Exhibition, Honolulu, HI, pp 2076

  4. Yao FY (2008) Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: beyond the Milan criteria. Am J Transplant 8:1982–1989. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02351.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen KT, Laurent A, Dagher I et al (2009) Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional, international report of safety, feasibility, and early outcomes. Ann Surg 250:842–848. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bc789c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Elmar Merkle is a member of the speakers’ bureau and a consultant for Bayer, the company that distributes gadoxetate disodium.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elmar M. Merkle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bashir, M.R., Merkle, E.M. Improved liver lesion conspicuity by increasing the flip angle during hepatocyte phase MR imaging. Eur Radiol 21, 291–294 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1917-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1917-1

Keywords

Navigation