Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of false-negative results after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy

European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the false-negative rate and to evaluate the clinical, radiologic or histologic features of false-negative results at ultrasound (US)-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy (CNB).

Methods

A total of 3,724 masses from 3,308 women who had undergone US-guided 14-gauge CNB and who had a rebiopsy or at least 2 years’ follow-up were included. The histology of CNB was correlated with the rebiopsy or long-term imaging follow-up. In cases of missed cancer, the time interval between CNB and rebiopsy, the reasons for rebiopsy, and the procedural or lesion characteristics were analysed.

Results

Of 1,706 benign CNBs, 50 additional malignancies were found at excision (false-negative rate, 2.5% of 1,982 with a final diagnosis of malignancy). Of 50 false negatives, 41 were found immediately of which 28 had rebiopsy because of imaging-histological discordance. Regarding the frequency of malignancy according to the reasons for rebiopsy, suspicious imaging finding (24%) showed significantly higher frequency than suspicious clinical findings or request (1%). Regarding the characteristics except invasiveness, no significant differences in false-negative rates were found.

Conclusions

Most false negatives were found immediately and imaging-histological discordance was the most important clue. Careful correlation of clinical, radiological and histological results as well as appropriate follow-up is essential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, O’Doherty A, McDermott EW, O’Higgins N (2005) The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with an analysis of false-negative cases. Ann Surg 242:701–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bassett LW, Mahoney MC, Apple SK (2007) Interventional breast imaging: current procedures and assessing for concordance with pathology. Radiol Clin North Am 45:881–894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Buskens E et al (2000) Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 82:1017–1021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Glassman JR et al (1997) Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy. Radiology 203:151–157

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ, Tocino I (1999) Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology 212:189–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ et al (1994) Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 193:359–364

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer JE, Christian RL, Lester SC et al (1996) Evaluation of nonpalpable solid breast masses with stereotaxic large-needle core biopsy using a dedicated unit. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:179–182

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fajardo LL, Pisano ED, Caudry DJ et al (2004) Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study. Acad Radiol 11:293–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Oh KK (2008) Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2,420 cases with long-term follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:202–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Crystal P, Koretz M, Shcharynsky S, Makarov V, Strano S (2005) Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 33:47–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L et al (2008) US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 248:406–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schoonjans JM, Brem RF (2001) Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 20:967–972

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF (1998) US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 208:717–723

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schueller G, Schueller-Weidekamm C, Helbich TH (2008) Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 18:1761–1773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shah VI, Raju U, Chitale D, Deshpande V, Gregory N, Strand V (2003) False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 consecutive cases of missed breast cancer. Cancer 97:1824–1831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA Jr, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ (1999) Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 210:799–805

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA et al (2000) Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. Cancer 89:2538–2546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Berg WA (2004) Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 42:935–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Burbank F, Parker SH (1998) Methods for analysis of one-step breast biopsy programs. Breast J 4:307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sauer G, Deissler H, Strunz K et al (2005) Ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsies of breast lesions: analysis of 962 cases to determine the number of samples for reliable tumour classification. Br J Cancer 92:231–235

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA et al (1993) US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 187:507–511

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith DN, Rosenfield Darling ML, Meyer JE et al (2001) The utility of ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 20:43–49

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mainiero MB, Koelliker SL, Lazarus E, Schepps B, Lee CH (2002) Ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsy of the breast: frequency and results of repeat biopsy. J Womens Imaging 4:52–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH et al (2005) Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods. Korean J Radiol 6:102–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH (2003) Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:347–351

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bolivar AV, Alonso-Bartolome P, Garcia EO, Ayensa FG (2005) Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: a prospective analysis in 204 cases. Acta Radiol 46:690–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Muttarak M, Lerttumnongtum P, Chaiwun B, Peh WC (2008) Spectrum of papillary lesions of the breast: clinical, imaging, and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:700–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tseng HS, Chen YL, Chen ST et al (2009) The management of papillary lesion of the breast by core needle biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:21–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Skandarajah AR, Field L, Yuen Larn Mou A et al (2008) Benign papilloma on core biopsy requires surgical excision. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2272–2277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lam WW, Chu WC, Tang AP, Tse G, Ma TK (2006) Role of radiologic features in the management of papillary lesions of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1322–1327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mercado CL, Hamele-Bena D, Oken SM, Singer CI, Cangiarella J (2006) Papillary lesions of the breast at percutaneous core-needle biopsy. Radiology 238:801–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Liberman L (2002) Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 40:483–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Lee JY, Oh KK (2007) Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them. Radiographics 27:79–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. de Lucena CE, Dos Santos Junior JL, de Lima Resende CA, do Amaral VF, de Almeida Barra A, Reis JH (2007) Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of breast masses: How many cores are necessary to diagnose cancer? J Clin Ultrasound 35:363–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moon WK, Myung JS, Lee YJ, Park IA, Noh DY, Im JG (2002) US of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics 22:269–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang WT, Tse GM (2004) Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:101–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cho KR, Seo BK, Kim CH et al (2008) Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound and mammographic findings correlated with histological findings. Yonsei Med J 49:103–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Starvros AT (2004) Malignant solid breast nodules: specific types. In: McAllister L, Donnellan K, Martin SP, Rothschild R (eds) Breast ultrasound. Lippincott Willams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 600–608

    Google Scholar 

  39. Alonso-Bartolome P, Vega-Bolivar A, Torres-Tabanera M et al (2004) Sonographically guided 11-G directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy as an alternative to surgical excision: utility and cost study in probably benign lesions. Acta Radiol 45:390–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Johnson AT, Henry-Tillman RS, Smith LF et al (2002) Percutaneous excisional breast biopsy. Am J Surg 184:550–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fine RE, Boyd BA, Whitworth PW, Kim JA, Harness JK, Burak WE (2002) Percutaneous removal of benign breast masses using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device with ultrasound guidance. Am J Surg 184:332–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fine RE, Whitworth PW, Kim JA, Harness JK, Boyd BA, Burak WE Jr (2003) Low-risk palpable breast masses removed using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device. Am J Surg 186:362–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Yonsei University Research Fund of 2009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun-Kyung Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Youk, J.H., Kim, EK., Kim, M.J. et al. Analysis of false-negative results after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 20, 782–789 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1632-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1632-y

Keywords

Navigation