Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnosis of gallbladder problems using three-dimensional ultrasound

  • Ultrasound
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine whether offline reported three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) is as accurate as standard two-dimensional ultrasound (2DUS) with regard to demonstrating gallbladder disease.

Method

The cohort comprised 80 consecutive patients referred for an abdominal ultrasound examination. The participants underwent routine 2DUS assessment of the gallbladder followed by the acquisition of two 3DUS volumes of the region of the gall bladder. The two techniques were reported independently of each other, and the diagnoses were compared for correlation.

Results

There was overall agreement of the two techniques in 89% of cases with a positive predictive value of 89%, negative predictive value of 91% and a specificity of 86%. Small polyps (sub-4 mm) were the only positive discrepancies. Cohen’s kappa found that there was substantial agreement between the two techniques (p = 0.05 for a two-tailed kappa 0.67), and chi-squared test found no significant difference in diagnoses (p = 0.95).

Conclusion

This study shows that 3DUS diagnosis correlates well with 2DUS with regard to most gallbladder problems and could be sufficient as a stand-alone technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2DUS:

two-dimensional ultrasound

3DUS:

three-dimensional ultrasound

BMI:

body mass index

MPR:

multi-planar reconstruction

References

  1. Shea J, Berlin JA, Escarce JJ et al (1994) Revised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease. Arch Intern Med 154:2573–2581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooperberg PL, Burhenne HJ (1980) Real-time ultrasonography: diagnostic technique of choice in calculous gallbladder disease. N Engl J Med 302:1277–1279

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ralls PW, Colletti PM, Lapin SA (1985) Real time sonography in suspected acute cholecystitis. Radiology 155:767–771

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bach AM, Loring LA, Hann LE et al (1998) Gallbladder cancer: can ultrasonography evaluate extent of disease? J Ultrasound Med 5:303–309

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stenberg B, Lee R, Dixon AM (2005) First trimester antenatal screening for down’s syndrome: a review of reliability and validity. Ultrasound 13:226–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B (2006) Three-dimensional US of the fetus: volume imaging. Radiology 238:988–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. GE Healthcare (2005) VIP protocol guide. Waukesha, USA

  8. Elliott ST (2008) Volume ultrasound: the next big thing? Br J Radiol 81:8–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B (2005) How sonographic tomography will change the face of obstetric sonography. J Ultrasound Med 24:371–378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goncalves LF, Lee W, Espinoza J, Romero R (2005) Three- and 4-dimensional ultrasound in obstetric practice: does it help? J Ultrasound Med 24:1599–1624

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goncalves LF, Nien JK, Espinoza J et al (2006) What does 2-dimensional imaging add to 3-dimensional obstetric ultrasonography? J Ultrasound Med 25:691–699

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hagel J, Bicknell SG (2006) Impact of 3D sonography on workroom time efficiency. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:966–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JS (1997) Determining sample size for testing equivalence, Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry Magazine, May, p.114

  14. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee KF, Wong J, Li JCM, Lai PBS (2004) Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. A J Surg 188:186–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koga A, Watanabe K, Fukuyama T et al (1988) Diagnosis and operative indications for polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. Arch Surg 123:26–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kubota K, Bandai Y, Noie T et al (1995) How should polypoid lesions of the gallbladder be treated in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Surgery 117:481–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Persley KM (2005) Gallbladder polyps. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 8:105–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aldouri AQ, Malik HZ, Waytt J, Khan S, Ranganathan K et al (2008) The risk of gallbladder cancer from polyps in a large multiethnic series. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:48–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leslie A, Lockyer H, Virjee JP (2000) Who should perform routine abdominal ultrasound? A prospective blind study comparing the accuracy of radiologist and radiographer. Clin Radiol 55:606–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

S. Elliott receives funding from Philips Healthcare for overseas lecturing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK

    Ben Stenberg & Simon Elliott

Authors
  1. Ben Stenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon Elliott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Stenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stenberg, B., Elliott, S. Diagnosis of gallbladder problems using three-dimensional ultrasound. Eur Radiol 20, 908–914 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1614-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1614-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation