Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity and reliability of language laterality assessment with a free reversed association task—a fMRI study

  • Neuro
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the study was to evaluate the sensitivity and reliability of assessing hemispheric language dominance with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) using a ‘free reversed association task.’

Methods

Thirty-nine healthy subjects (13 dextrals, 13 sinistrals and 13 bimanuals) underwent two repeated fMRI sessions. In the active phases sets of words were presented via headphones, and an associated target item was named. During the baseline phases a standard answer was given after listening to unintelligible stimuli. Data were preprocessed with SPM, and then laterality indices (LI) and reliability coefficients (RC) were calculated.

Results

Extensive frontal, temporal and parietal activations were found. Seventy-eight percent of the subjects showed left-hemispheric dominance, 5% showed right-hemispheric dominance, and 17% had bilateral language representations. The incidence of right-hemispheric language dominance was 4.3 times higher in a left-hander with a handedness quotient (HQ) of −90 than in a right-hander with a HQ of +90. The RC was 0.61 for combined ROIs (global network). Strong correlations were found between the two session LIs (r = 0.95 for the global network).

Conclusion

‘Free reversed association’ is a sensitive and reliable task for the determination of individual language lateralization. This suggests that the task may be used in a clinical setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Binder JR, Swanson SJ, Hammeke TA, Morris GL, Mueller WM, Fischer M, Benbadis S, Frost JA, Rao SM, Haughton VM (1996) Determination of language dominance using functional MRI: a comparison with the Wada test. Neurology 46:978–984

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Woermann FG, Jokeit H, Luerding R, Freitag H, Schulz R, Guertler S, Okujava M, Wolf P, Tuxhorn I, Ebner A (2003) Language lateralization by Wada test and fMRI in 100 patients with epilepsy. Neurology 61:699–701

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brannen JH, Badie B, Moritz CH, Quigley M, Meyerand ME, Haughton VM (2001) Reliability of functional MR imaging with word-generation tasks for mapping Broca’s area. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:1711–1718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rau S, Fesl G, Bruhns P, Havel P, Braun B, Tonn JC, Ilmberger J (2007) Reproducibility of activations in Broca area with two language tasks: a functional MR imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:1346–1353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernandez G, Specht K, Weis S, Tendolkar I, Reuber M, Fell J, Klaver P, Ruhlmann J, Reul J, Elger CE (2003) Intrasubject reproducibility of presurgical language lateralization and mapping using fMRI. Neurology 60:969–975

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rutten GJ, Ramsey NF, van Rijen PC, van Veelen CW (2002) Reproducibility of fMRI-determined language lateralization in individual subjects. Brain Lang 80:421–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Knecht S, Jansen A, Frank A, van Randenborgh J, Sommer J, Kanowski M, Heinze HJ (2003) How atypical is atypical language dominance? Neuroimage 18:917–927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Szaflarski JP, Binder JR, Possing ET, McKiernan KA, Ward BD, Hammeke TA (2002) Language lateralization in left-handed and ambidextrous people: fMRI data. Neurology 59:238–244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehericy S, Cohen L, Bazin B, Samson S, Giacomini E, Rougetet R, Hertz-Pannier L, Le Bihan D, Marsault C, Baulac M (2000) Functional MR evaluation of temporal and frontal language dominance compared with the Wada test. Neurology 54:1625–1633

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spreer J, Arnold S, Quiske A, Wohlfarth R, Ziyeh S, Altenmuller D, Herpers M, Kassubek J, Klisch J, Steinhoff BJ, Honegger J, Schulze-Bonhage A, Schumacher M (2002) Determination of hemisphere dominance for language: comparison of frontal and temporal fMRI activation with intracarotid amytal testing. Neuroradiology 44:467–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramsey NF, Sommer IE, Rutten GJ, Kahn RS (2001) Combined analysis of language tasks in fMRI improves assessment of hemispheric dominance for language functions in individual subjects. Neuroimage 13:719–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaillard WD, Balsamo L, Xu B, McKinney C, Papero PH, Weinstein S, Conry J, Pearl PL, Sachs B, Sato S, Vezina LG, Frattali C, Theodore WH (2004) fMRI language task panel improves determination of language dominance. Neurology 63:1403–1408

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gitelman DR, Nobre AC, Sonty S, Parrish TB, Mesulam MM (2005) Language network specializations: an analysis with parallel task designs and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 26:975–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Deese J (1965) The structure of associations in language and thought. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  15. Friederici AD, Alter K (2004) Lateralization of auditory language functions: a dynamic dual pathway model. Brain Lang 89:267–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scott SK (2005) Auditory processing - speech, space and auditory objects. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:197–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scott SK, Wise RJ (2004) The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception. Cognition 92:13–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hickok G, Poeppel D (2004) Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92:67–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ullman MT (2001) A neurocognitive perspective on language: the declarative/procedural model. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:717–726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ullman MT (2004) Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model. Cognition 92:231–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hagoort P, Hald L, Bastiaansen M, Petersson KM (2004) Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 304:438–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jonides J, Lacey SC, Nee DE (2005) Processes of Working Memory in Mind and Brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science 14:2–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shivde G, Thompson-Schill SL (2004) Dissociating semantic and phonological maintenance using fMRI. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4:10–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Catani M, Jones DK, ffytche DH (2005) Perisylvian language networks of the human brain. Ann Neurol 57:8–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Devlin JT, Moore CJ, Mummery CJ, Gorno-Tempini ML, Phillips JA, Noppeney U, Frackowiak RS, Friston KJ, Price CJ (2002) Anatomic constraints on cognitive theories of category specificity. Neuroimage 15:675–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thompson-Schill SL, Bedny M, Goldberg RF (2005) The frontal lobes and the regulation of mental activity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:219–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Knecht S, Drager B, Deppe M, Bobe L, Lohmann H, Floel A, Ringelstein EB, Henningsen H (2000) Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain 123(Pt 12):2512–2518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Desmond JE, Sum JM, Wagner AD, Demb JB, Shear PK, Glover GH, Gabrieli JD, Morrell MJ (1995) Functional MRI measurement of language lateralization in Wada-tested patients. Brain 118(Pt 6):1411–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bahn MM, Lin W, Silbergeld DL, Miller JW, Kuppusamy K, Cook RJ, Hammer G, Wetzel R, Cross D 3rd (1997) Localization of language cortices by functional MR imaging compared with intracarotid amobarbital hemispheric sedation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:575–579

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yetkin FZ, Swanson S, Fischer M, Akansel G, Morris G, Mueller W, Haughton V (1998) Functional MR of frontal lobe activation: comparison with Wada language results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:1095–1098

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Carpentier A, Pugh KR, Westerveld M, Studholme C, Skrinjar O, Thompson JL, Spencer DD, Constable RT (2001) Functional MRI of language processing: dependence on input modality and temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 42:1241–1254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rutten GJ, Ramsey NF, van Rijen PC, Alpherts WC, van Veelen CW (2002) FMRI-determined language lateralization in patients with unilateral or mixed language dominance according to the Wada test. Neuroimage 17:447–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sabbah P, Chassoux F, Leveque C, Landre E, Baudoin-Chial S, Devaux B, Mann M, Godon-Hardy S, Nioche C, Ait-Ameur A, Sarrazin JL, Chodkiewicz JP, Cordoliani YS (2003) Functional MR imaging in assessment of language dominance in epileptic patients. Neuroimage 18:460–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Springer JA, Binder JR, Hammeke TA, Swanson SJ, Frost JA, Bellgowan PS, Brewer CC, Perry HM, Morris GL, Mueller WM (1999) Language dominance in neurologically normal and epilepsy subjects: a functional MRI study. Brain 122(Pt 11):2033–2046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Barnett KJ, Corballis MC (2002) Ambidexterity and magical ideation. Laterality 7:75–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Corey DM, Hurley MM, Foundas AL (2001) Right and left handedness defined: a multivariate approach using hand preference and hand performance measures. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 14:144–152

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang J, Carr TH, Cao Y (2002) Comparing cortical activations for silent and overt speech using event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 15:39–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988) Co-planar stereotactic atlas of the human brain. Thieme, New York

    Google Scholar 

  40. Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Poline JB, Frith CD, Heather JD, Frackowiak RSJ (1995) Spatial registration and normalisation of images. Hum Brain Mapp 2:165–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Poline JB, Worsley KJ, Holmes AP, Frackowiak RS, Friston KJ (1995) Estimating smoothness in statistical parametric maps: variability of p values. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:788–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline JB, Frith CD, Frackowiak RS (1995) Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 2:189–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 15:273–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Demonet JF, Thierry G, Cardebat D (2005) Renewal of the neurophysiology of language: functional neuroimaging. Physiol Rev 85:49–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, Hoogenraad FG, Sprenger M, Valk J, Scheltens P (1997) Test-retest analysis with functional MR of the activated area in the human visual cortex. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:1317–1322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Liegeois F, Connelly A, Salmond CH, Gadian DG, Vargha-Khadem F, Baldeweg T (2002) A direct test for lateralization of language activation using fMRI: comparison with invasive assessments in children with epilepsy. Neuroimage 17:1861–1867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nagata SI, Uchimura K, Hirakawa W, Kuratsu JI (2001) Method for quantitatively evaluating the lateralization of linguistic function using functional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:985–991

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Scott SK, Blank CC, Rosen S, Wise RJ (2000) Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 123 Pt 12:2400–2406

    Google Scholar 

  49. Crottaz-Herbette S, Anagnoson RT, Menon V (2004) Modality effects in verbal working memory: differential prefrontal and parietal responses to auditory and visual stimuli. Neuroimage 21:340–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Indefrey P, Levelt WJ (2004) The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 92:101–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Shuster LI, Lemieux SK (2005) An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono- and multisyllabic words. Brain Lang 93:20–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Duffau H, Capelle L, Denvil D, Gatignol P, Sichez N, Lopes M, Sichez JP, Van Effenterre R (2003) The role of dominant premotor cortex in language: a study using intraoperative functional mapping in awake patients. Neuroimage 20:1903–1914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ackermann H, Riecker A (2004) The contribution of the insula to motor aspects of speech production: a review and a hypothesis. Brain Lang 89:320–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rasmussen T, Milner B (1977) The role of early left-brain injury in determining lateralization of cerebral speech functions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 299:355–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Risse GL, Gates JR, Fangman MC (1997) A reconsideration of bilateral language representation based on the intracarotid amobarbital procedure. Brain Cogn 33:118–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pujol J, Deus J, Losilla JM, Capdevila A (1999) Cerebral lateralization of language in normal left-handed people studied by functional MRI. Neurology 52:1038–1043

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kloppel S, Buchel C (2005) Alternatives to the Wada test: a critical view of functional magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative use. Curr Opin Neurol 18:418–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Powell HR, Duncan JS (2005) Functional magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of language and memory in clinical practice: review. Curr Opin Neurol 18:161–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the “Förderprogramm für Forschung und Lehre der LMU-München“(Reg. No. 332), University of Munich, Germany. We are grateful to Virginia Flanagin for critically reading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gunther Fesl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fesl, G., Bruhns, P., Rau, S. et al. Sensitivity and reliability of language laterality assessment with a free reversed association task—a fMRI study. Eur Radiol 20, 683–695 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1602-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1602-4

Keywords

Navigation