Comparison of three different iodine-based bowel regimens for CT colonography
- 160 Downloads
The aim of this study was to compare the computed tomographic colonography (CTC) image quality and patient acceptance of three iodine-based faecal tagging bowel preparations in 60 patients undergoing the following regimens: a 2-day regimen of meal-time administration of iodine and phospho-soda (GFPH); a 2-day regimen of meal-time mild laxative, followed by iodine administered 2 h before CTC (SD); and a 2-day regimen of meal-time administration of iodine (GF).
Two independent radiologists assessed tagging quality; quantitative measures included the tagged stool density, and computer-aided detection (CAD) false-positive rate.
The GFPH and SD regimens provided better subjective quality than GF (p < 0.001). The latter regimen resulted in a higher proportion of insufficiently tagged segments: the measured average stool density was less than 200 HU in 10.7% in all segments vs 3.6% for SD and <0.5% for GFPH, respectively. Insufficient tagging occurred mostly in the ascending colon and the caecum. The CAD false-positive rate increased following the trend: GFPH < SD < GF (p = 0.00012). GFPH was worse tolerated than SD (p < 0.05).
Considering preparation quality alone, GFPH was the best regimen, but SD provided the best balance between bowel preparation quality and patient acceptability.
KeywordsCT colonography Faecal tagging Bowel preparation Quality assessment Computer aided detection
- 3.Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58:130–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Neri E, Turini F, Cerri F, Vagli P, Bartolozzi C (2008) CT colonography: same-day tagging regimen with iodixanol and reduced cathartic preparation. Abdom Imaging. doi:10.1007/s00261-008-9453-z
- 24.Delsanto S, Morra L, Agliozzo S et al (2008) Computer aided detection of polyps in virtual colonoscopy with sameday faecal tagging. Proc SPIE Medical Imaging 6915-28Google Scholar
- 26.Sprent P, Smeeton NC (2001) Applied nonparametric statistical methods, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 28.Campanella D, Morra L, Delsanto S, Gallo TM, Tartaglia V, Regge D (2008) Quantitative quality assessment of different faecal tagging (FT) CT colonography (CTC) preparations. Eur Radiol 18(Suppl 1):B-363Google Scholar