Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MR angiography with parallel acquisition for assessment of the visceral arteries: comparison with conventional MR angiography and 64-detector-row computed tomography

  • Magnetic Resonance
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to retrospectively compare three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (conventional MRA) with MRA accelerated by a parallel acquisition technique (fast MRA) for the assessment of visceral arteries, using 64-detector-row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) as the reference standard. Eighteen patients underwent fast MRA (imaging time 17 s), conventional MRA (29 s) and MDCTA of the abdomen and pelvis. Two independent readers assessed subjective image quality and the presence of arterial stenosis. Data were analysed on per-patient and per-segment bases. Fast MRA yielded better subjective image quality in all segments compared with conventional MRA (P = 0.012 for reader 1, P = 0.055 for reader 2) because of fewer motion-induced artefacts. Sensitivity and specificity of fast MRA for the detection of arterial stenosis were 100% for both readers. Sensitivity of conventional MRA was 89% for both readers, and specificity was 100% (reader 1) and 99% (reader 2). Differences in sensitivity between the two types of MRA were not significant for either reader. Interobserver agreement for the detection of arterial stenosis was excellent for fast (κ = 1.00) and good for conventional MRA (κ = 0.76). Thus, subjective image quality of visceral arteries remains good on fast MRA compared with conventional MRA, and the two techniques do not differ substantially in the grading of arterial stenosis, despite the markedly reduced acquisition time of fast MRA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cognet F, Ben Salem D, Dranssart M et al (2002) Chronic mesenteric ischemia: imaging and percutaneous treatment. Radiographics 22:863–879

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Horton KM, Fishman EK (2007) Multidetector CT angiography in the diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia. Radiol Clin North Am 45:275–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shih M-CP, Hagspiel KD (2007) CTA and MRA in mesenteric ischemia: part 1, role in diagnosis and differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:452–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meaney JF, Prince MR, Nostrant TT, Stanley JC (1997) Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of visceral arteries in patients with suspected chronic mesenteric ischemia. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:171–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hany TF, Schmidt M, Schoenenberger AW, Debatin JF (1998) Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the splanchnic vasculature before and after caloric stimulation. Original investigation. Invest Radiol 33:682–686

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Heiss SG, Li KC (1998) Magnetic resonance angiography of mesenteric arteries. A review. Invest Radiol 33:670–681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Billaud Y, Beuf O, Desjeux G, Valette PJ, Pilleul F (2005) 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its distal branches: interobserver agreement of radiologists in a routine examination. Acad Radiol 12:155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ernst O, Asnar V, Sergent G et al (2000) Comparing contrast-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography and conventional angiography in the evaluation of mesenteric circulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:433–439

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC et al (1995) Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 197:785–792

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sodickson DK, Manning WJ (1997) Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 38:591–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P (1999) SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:952–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heilmaier C, Sutter R, Lutz AM et al (2007) Mapping of hepatic vascular anatomy: dynamic contrast-enhanced parallel MR imaging compared with 64 detector row CT. Radiology 245:872–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McKenzie CA, Lim D, Ransil BJ et al (2004) Shortening MR image acquisition time for volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination with a recently developed parallel imaging reconstruction technique: clinical feasibility. Radiology 230:589–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Werder R, Nanz D, Lutz AM et al (2007) Assessment of the abdominal aorta and its visceral branches by contrast-enhanced dynamic volumetric hepatic parallel magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility, reliability and accuracy. Eur Radiol 17:541–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu PJ, Yan FH, Wang JH, Lin J, Fan J (2007) Utilizing generalized autocalibrating partial parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) to achieve high-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of hepatic artery: initial experience in orthotopic liver transplantation candidates. Eur J Radiol 61:507–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ho LM, Merkle EM, Paulson EK, Dale BM (2007) Contrast-enhanced hepatic magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T: does parallel imaging improve image quality? J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:177–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sutter R, Nanz D, Lutz AM et al (2007) Assessment of aortoiliac and renal arteries: MR angiography with parallel acquisition versus conventional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 245:276–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kroencke TJ, Wasser MN, Pattynama PM et al (2002) Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1573–1582

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Knopp MV et al (1999) Renal arteries: optimization of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with bolus-timing-independent fast multiphase acquisition in a single breath hold. Radiology 211:667–679

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goyen M, Herborn CU, Kroger K, Lauenstein TC, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG (2003) Detection of atherosclerosis: systemic imaging for systemic disease with whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography - initial experience. Radiology 227:277–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goldfarb JW (2004) The SENSE ghost: field-of-view restrictions for SENSE imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:1046–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Kondo H et al (2006) MDCT of the liver and hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: optimizing scan delays for bolus-tracking techniques of hepatic arterial and portal venous phases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:W25–W32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen Q, Quijano CV, Mai VM et al (2004) On improving temporal and spatial resolution of 3D contrast-enhanced body MR angiography with parallel imaging. Radiology 231:893–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zenge MO, Vogt FM, Brauck K et al (2006) High-resolution continuously acquired peripheral MR angiography featuring partial parallel imaging GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med 56:859–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33:363–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shirkhoda A, Konez O, Shetty AN, Bis KG, Ellwood RA, Kirsch MJ (1998) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the mesenteric circulation: a pictorial essay. Radiographics 18:851–861 discussion 862–855

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jeays AD, Lawford PV, Gillott R et al (2007) Characterisation of the haemodynamics of the superior mesenteric artery. J Biomech 40:1916–1926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wasser MN, Geelkerken RH, Kouwenhoven M et al (1996) Systolically gated 3D phase contrast MRA of mesenteric arteries in suspected mesenteric ischemia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:262–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schoepf UJ, Becker C, Bruning R et al (1999) Computed tomography of the abdomen with multidetector-array CT. Radiologe 39:652–661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vasbinder GB, Maki JH, Nijenhuis RJ et al (2002) Motion of the distal renal artery during three-dimensional contrast-enhanced breath-hold MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:685–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nael K, Saleh R, Lee M et al (2006) High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of abdominal arteries with parallel acquisition at 3.0 T: initial experience in 32 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:W77–W85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chang KJ, Kamel IR, Macura KJ, Bluemke DA (2008) 3.0-T MR imaging of the abdomen: comparison with 1.5 T. Radiographics 28:1983–1998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Krautmacher C, Willinek WA, Tschampa HJ et al (2005) Brain tumors: full- and half-dose contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T–initial experience. Radiology 237:1014–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Michaely HJ, Kramer H, Dietrich O et al (2007) Intraindividual comparison of high-spatial-resolution abdominal MR angiography at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: initial experience. Radiology 244:907–913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nael K, Laub G, Finn JP (2005) Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the thoraco-abdominal vessels. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13:359–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Reto Sutter, Amelie M. Lutz, Dominik Weishaupt & Jürgen K. Willmann

  2. Department of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland

    Reto Sutter

  3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

    Christina Heilmaier

  4. Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr., Room H1307, Stanford, CA, 94305-5621, USA

    Amelie M. Lutz & Jürgen K. Willmann

  5. Department of Radiology, Hospital Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland

    Dominik Weishaupt

  6. Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Burkhardt Seifert

Authors
  1. Reto Sutter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christina Heilmaier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amelie M. Lutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dominik Weishaupt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Burkhardt Seifert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jürgen K. Willmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürgen K. Willmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sutter, R., Heilmaier, C., Lutz, A.M. et al. MR angiography with parallel acquisition for assessment of the visceral arteries: comparison with conventional MR angiography and 64-detector-row computed tomography. Eur Radiol 19, 2679–2688 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1473-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1473-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation