Skip to main content
Log in

Direct magnetic resonance arthrography of the knee: utility of axial traction

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of axial traction during acquisition of direct magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography examination of the knee in terms of joint space width and amount of contrast material between the cartilage surfaces. Direct knee MR arthrography was performed in 11 patients on a 3-T MR imaging unit using a T1-weighted isotropic gradient echo sequence in a coronal plane with and without axial traction of 15 kg. Joint space widths were measured at the level of the medial and the lateral femorotibial joint with and without traction. The amount of contrast material in the medial and lateral femorotibial joint was assessed independently by two musculoskeletal radiologists in a semiquantitative manner using three grades (‘absence of surface visualization, ‘partial surface visualization or ‘complete surface visualization’). With traction, joint space width increased significantly at the lateral femorotibial compartment (mean = 0.55 mm, p = 0.0105) and at the medial femorotibial compartment (mean = 0.4 mm, p = 0.0124). There was a trend towards an increased amount of contrast material in the femorotibial compartment with axial traction. Direct MR arthrography of the knee with axial traction showed a slight and significant increase of the width of the femorotibial compartment with a trend towards more contrast material between the articular cartilage surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Applegate GR, Flannigan BD, Tolin BS, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W (1993) MR diagnosis of recurrent tears in the knee: value of intraarticular contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161:821–825

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Magee T, Shapiro M, Rodriguez J, Williams D (2003) MR arthrography of postoperative knee: for which patients is it useful? Radiology 229:159–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. White LM, Schweitzer ME, Weishaupt D, Kramer J, Davis A, Marks PH (2002) Diagnosis of recurrent meniscal tears: prospective evaluation of conventional MR imaging, indirect MR arthrography, and direct MR arthrography. Radiology 222:421–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brossmann J, Preidler KW, Daenen B, Pedowitz RA, Andresen R, Clopton P, Trudell D, Pathria M, Resnick D (1996) Imaging of osseous and cartilaginous intraarticular bodies in the knee: comparison of MR imaging and MR arthrography with CT and CT arthrography in cadavers. Radiology 200:509–517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gagliardi JA, Chung EM, Chandnani VP, Kesling KL, Christensen KP, Null RN, Radvany MG, Hansen MF (1994) Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:629–636

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harman M, Ipeksoy U, Dogan A, Arslan H, Etlik O (2003) MR arthrography in chondromalacia patellae diagnosis on a low-field open magnet system. Clin Imaging 27:194–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kramer J, Stiglbauer R, Engel A, Prayer L, Imhof H (1992) MR contrast arthrography (MRA) in osteochondrosis dissecans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16:254–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McCauley TR, Elfar A, Moore A, Haims AH, Jokl P, Lynch JK, Ruwe PA, Katz LD (2003) MR arthrography of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction grafts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1217–1223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sampson T (2005) The lateral approach. In: Bryrd J (ed) Operative hip arthroscopy. Springer, New York, pp 129–144

  10. Chan KK, Muldoon KA, Yeh L, Boutin R, Pedowitz R, Skaf A, Trudell DJ, Resnick D (1999) Superior labral anteroposterior lesions: MR arthrography with arm traction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1117–1122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Llopis E, Cerezal L, Kassarjian A, Higueras V, Fernandez E (2008) Direct MR arthrography of the hip with leg traction: feasibility for assessing articular cartilage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1124–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nishii T, Nakanishi K, Sugano N, Naito H, Tamura S, Ochi T (1996) Acetabular labral tears: contrast-enhanced MR imaging under continuous leg traction. Skeletal Radiol 25:349–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33:363–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Guntern.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palhais, N.S., Guntern, D., Kagel, A. et al. Direct magnetic resonance arthrography of the knee: utility of axial traction. Eur Radiol 19, 2225–2231 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1389-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1389-3

Keywords

Navigation