Abstract
Detailed knowledge of aortic root geometry is a prerequisite to anticipate complications of transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) implantation. We determined coronary ostial locations and aortic root dimensions in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and compared these values with normal subjects using computed tomography (CT). One hundred consecutive patients with severe tricuspid AS and 100 consecutive patients without valvular pathology (referred to as the controls) undergoing cardiac dual-source CT were included. Distances from the aortic annulus (AA) to the left coronary ostium (LCO), right coronary ostium (RCO), the height of the left coronary sinus (HLS), right coronary sinus (HRS), and aortic root dimensions [diameters of AA, sinus of Valsalva (SV), and sino-tubular junction(STJ)] were measured. LCO and RCO were 14.9 ± 3.2 mm (8.2–25.9) and 16.8 ± 3.6 mm (12.0–25.7) in the controls, 15.5 ± 2.9 mm (8.8–24.3) and 17.3 ± 3.6 mm (7.3–26.0) in patients with AS. Controls and patients with AS had similar values for LCO (P = 0.18), RCO (P = 0.33) and HLS (P = 0.88), whereas HRS (P < 0.05) was significantly larger in patients with AS. AA (r = 0.55,P < 0.001), SV (r = 0.54,P < 0.001), and STJ (r = 0.52,P < 0.001) significantly correlated with the body surface area in the controls; whereas no correlation was found in patients with AS. Patients with AS had significantly larger AA (P < 0.01) and STJ (P < 0.01) diameters when compared with the controls. In patients with severe tricuspid AS, coronary ostial locations were similar to the controls, but a transverse remodelling of the aortic root was recognized. Owing to the large distribution of ostial locations and the dilatation of the aortic root, CT is recommended before TAV implantation in each patient.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG et al (2003) A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 24:1231–1243
Kvidal P, Bergstrom R, Horte LG et al (2000) Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:747–756
Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K et al (2006) ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:e1–e148
Lutter G, Ardehali R, Cremer J et al (2004) Percutaneous valve replacement: current state and future prospects. Ann Thorac Surg 78:2199–2206
Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C et al (2006) Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve: mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: the French experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1214–1223
Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR et al (2006) Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation 113:842–850
Walther T, Simon P, Dewey T et al (2007) Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: multicenter experience. Circulation 116:I240–I245
Ye J, Cheung A, Lichtenstein SV et al (2007) Six-month outcome of transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the initial seven patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 31:16–21
Eltchaninoff H, Zajarias A, Tron C et al (2008) [Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: technical aspects, results and indications]. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 101:126–132
Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A et al (2002) Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 106:3006–3008
Boudjemline Y, Bonhoeffer P (2002) Steps toward percutaneous aortic valve replacement. Circulation 105:775–778
Lutter G, Kuklinski D, Berg G et al (2002) Percutaneous aortic valve replacement: an experimental study. I. Studies on implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:768–776
Boudjemline Y, Bonhoeffer P (2003) Percutaneous valve insertion: a new approach? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125:741–742 author reply 742–743
Huber CH, Tozzi P, Corno AF et al (2004) Do valved stents compromise coronary flow? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:754–759
Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY et al (2006) Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2020–2024
Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA et al (2006) Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1658–1665
Scheffel H, Leschka S, Plass A et al (2007) Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for the preoperative detection of coronary artery disease in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 100:701–706
Alkadhi H, Desbiolles L, Husmann L et al (2007) Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CT. Radiology 245:111–121
Lu TL, Huber CH, Rizzo E et al (2008) Ascending aorta measurements as assessed by ECG-gated multi-detector computed tomography: a pilot study to establish normative values for transcatheter therapies. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1182-8
Mosteller RD (1987) Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med 317:1098
Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2007) Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing. Invest Radiol 42:543–549
Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T et al (2008) Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18:592–599
Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G et al (2000) Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 343:611–617
Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C et al (2004) Early experience with percutaneous transcatheter implantation of heart valve prosthesis for the treatment of end-stage inoperable patients with calcific aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:698–703
Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A et al (2006) Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography. Radiology 240:47–55
LaBounty TM, Sundaram B, Agarwal P et al (2008) Aortic valve area on 64-MDCT correlates with transesophageal echocardiography in aortic stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1652–1658
Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Bonatti J et al (2007) Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:197–203
Berdajs D, Lajos P, Turina M (2002) The anatomy of the aortic root. Cardiovasc Surg 10:320–327
Swanson M, Clark RE (1974) Dimensions and geometric relationships of the human aortic valve as a function of pressure. Circ Res 35:871–882
Jatene MB, Monteiro R, Guimaraes MH et al (1999) Aortic valve assessment. Anatomical study of 100 healthy human hearts. Arq Bras Cardiol 73:75–86
Cavalcanti JS, de Melo NC, de Vasconcelos RS (2003) Morphometric and topographic study of coronary ostia. Arq Bras Cardiol 81:359–362 355–358
Crawford MH, Roldan CA (2001) Prevalence of aortic root dilatation and small aortic roots in valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 87:1311–1313
Vasan RS, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ et al (1995) Echocardiographic reference values for aortic root size: the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 8:793–800
Messika-Zeitoun D, Aubry MC, Detaint D et al (2004) Evaluation and clinical implications of aortic valve calcification measured by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation 110:356–362
Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A et al (2007) Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology 244:745–754
Saam T, Oberhoffer M, Rist C et al (2008) [Assessment of aortic stenosis after aortic valve replacement: comparative evaluation of dual-source CT and echocardiography]. Rofo 180:553–560
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Center of Competence in Research, Computer Aided and Image Guided Medical Interventions of the Swiss National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stolzmann, P., Knight, J., Desbiolles, L. et al. Remodelling of the aortic root in severe tricuspid aortic stenosis: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Radiol 19, 1316–1323 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1302-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1302-0