Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Triple rule-out CT in the emergency department: protocols and spectrum of imaging findings

  • Chest
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Triage decisions in patients suffering from acute chest pain remain a challenge. The patient’s history, initial cardiac enzyme levels, or initial electrocardiograms (ECG) often do not allow selecting the patients in whom further tests are needed. Numerous vascular and non-vascular chest problems, such as pulmonary embolism (PE), aortic dissection, or acute coronary syndrome, as well as pulmonary, pleural, or osseous lesions, must be taken into account. Nowadays, contrast-enhanced multi-detector-row computed tomography (CT) has replaced previous invasive diagnostic procedures and currently represents the imaging modality of choice when the clinical suspicion of PE or acute aortic syndrome is raised. At the same time, CT is capable of detecting a multitude of non-vascular causes of acute chest pain, such as pneumonia, pericarditis, or fractures. Recent technical advances in CT technology have also shown great advantages for non-invasive imaging of the coronary arteries. In patients with acute chest pain, the optimization of triage decisions and cost-effectiveness using cardiac CT in the emergency department have been repetitively demonstrated. Triple rule-out CT denominates an ECG-gated protocol that allows for the depiction of the pulmonary arteries, thoracic aorta, and coronary arteries within a single examination. This can be accomplished through the use of a dedicated contrast media administration regimen resulting in a simultaneous attenuation of the three vessel territories. This review is intended to demonstrate CT parameters and contrast media administration protocols for performing a triple rule-out CT and discusses radiation dose issues pertinent to the protocol. Typical life-threatening and non-life-threatening diseases causing acute chest pain are illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Erhardt L, Herlitz J, Bossaert L et al (2002) Task force on the management of chest pain. Eur Heart J 23:1153–1176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Karlson BW, Herlitz J, Pettersson P, Ekvall HE, Hjalmarson A (1991) Patients admitted to the emergency room with symptoms indicative of acute myocardial infarction. J Intern Med 230:251–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee TH, Rouan GW, Weisberg MC et al (1987) Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency room. Am J Cardiol 60:219–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Swap CJ, Nagurney JT (2005) Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 294:2623–2629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zimmerman J, Fromm R, Meyer D et al (1999) Diagnostic marker cooperative study for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Circulation 99:1671–1677

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaul P, Newby LK, Fu Y et al (2004) International differences in evolution of early discharge after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 363:511–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayter RG, Rhea JT, Small A, Tafazoli FS, Novelline RA (2006) Suspected aortic dissection and other aortic disorders: multi-detector row CT in 373 cases in the emergency setting. Radiology 238:841–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH et al (2005) Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA 293:2012–2017

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F et al (2006) Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation 114:2251–2260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sato Y, Matsumoto N, Ichikawa M et al (2005) Efficacy of multislice computed tomography for the detection of acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Circ J 69:1047–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gallagher MJ, Ross MA, Raff GL, Goldstein JA, O’Neill WW, O’Neil B (2007) The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients. Ann Emerg Med 49:125–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Ross MA, O’Neil B, Raff GL (2007) A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:863–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography-initial experience. Eur J Radiol 57:331–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ et al (2006) Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 16:1409–1415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2008) Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 29:766–776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2006) Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 16:2739–2747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Becker A et al (2008) Dual-source CT for chest pain assessment. Eur Radiol 18:773–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schertler T, Scheffel H, Frauenfelder T et al (2007) Dual-source computed tomography in patients with acute chest pain: feasibility and image quality. Eur Radiol 17:3179–3188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ et al (2007) Optimization of contrast material administration for electrocardiogram-gated computed tomographic angiography of the chest. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:265–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Takakuwa KM, Halpern EJ (2008) Evaluation of a “triple rule-out” coronary CT angiography protocol: use of 64-Section CT in low-to-moderate risk emergency department patients suspected of having acute coronary syndrome. Radiology 248:438–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ketelsen D, Luetkhoff MH, Thomas C et al (2008) Estimation of the radiation exposure of a chest pain protocol with ECG-gating in dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol:ePub

  23. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B et al (2002) Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 12:1081–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2007) Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing. Invest Radiol 42:543–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T et al (2008) Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18:592–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT et al (2008) Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 18:1809–1817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113:1305–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gerber TC, Kuzo RS, Morin RL (2005) Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:165–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Cerqueira MD, Henzlova MJ (2007) Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 116:1290–1305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Becker CR, Hong C, Knez A et al (2003) Optimal contrast application for cardiac 4-detector-row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 38:690–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S et al (2008) Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart 94:1132–1137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Calhoun PS, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Carley JC, Fishman EK (1999) Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. Radiographics 19:745–764

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dalrymple NC, Prasad SR, Freckleton MW, Chintapalli KN (2005) Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): introduction to the language of three-dimensional imaging with multidetector CT. Radiographics 25:1409–1428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bean MJ, Pannu H, Fishman EK (2005) Three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging of complex congenital cardiovascular abnormalities. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:721–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bergqvist D, Lindblad B (1985) A 30-year survey of pulmonary embolism verified at autopsy: an analysis of 1274 surgical patients. Br J Surg 72:105–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Soloff LA, Rodman T (1967) Acute pulmonary embolism. II. Clinical. Am Heart J 74:829–847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cross JJ, Kemp PM, Walsh CG, Flower CD, Dixon AK (1998) A randomized trial of spiral CT and ventilation perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Clin Radiol 53:177–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fedullo PF, Tapson VF (2003) Clinical practice. The evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 349:1247–1256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Coche EE, Muller NL, Kim KI, Wiggs BR, Mayo JR (1998) Acute pulmonary embolism: ancillary findings at spiral CT. Radiology 207:753–758

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Collomb D, Paramelle PJ, Calaque O et al (2003) Severity assessment of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation using helical CT. Eur Radiol 13:1508–1514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ghaye B, Ghuysen A, Willems V et al (2006) Severe pulmonary embolism:pulmonary artery clot load scores and cardiovascular parameters as predictors of mortality. Radiology 239:884–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Araoz PA, Gotway MB, Trowbridge RL et al (2003) Helical CT pulmonary angiography predictors of in-hospital morbidity and mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. J Thorac Imaging 18:207–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Walsh PN GR, Simon M et al (1973) An angiographic severity index for pulmonary embolism. Circulation:101–108

  45. Dogan H, Kroft LJ, Huisman MV, van der Geest RJ, de Roos A (2007) Right ventricular function in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: analysis with electrocardiography-synchronized multi-detector row CT. Radiology 242:78–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM et al (2000) The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA 283:897–903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Roos JE, Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Lachat M, Marincek B, Hilfiker PR (2002) Thoracic aorta: motion artifact reduction with retrospective and prospective electrocardiography-assisted multi-detector row CT. Radiology 222:271–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ et al (2007) ECG-gated 64-MDCT angiography in the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hollander JE, Sease KL, Sparano DM, Sites FD, Shofer FS, Baxt WG (2004) Effects of neural network feedback to physicians on admit/discharge decision for emergency department patients with chest pain. Ann Emerg Med 44:199–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hoffmann U, Pena AJ, Cury RC et al (2006) Cardiac CT in emergency department patients with acute chest pain. Radiographics 26:963–978 discussion 979–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hoffmann U, Pena AJ, Moselewski F et al (2006) MDCT in early triage of patients with acute chest pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1240–1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Brindis RG, Douglas PS, Hendel RC et al (2005) ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:1587–1605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kitagawa K, Sakuma H, Nagata M et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion MRI and late gadolinium-enhanced MRI for detecting flow-limiting coronary artery disease: a multicenter study. Eur Radiol:ePub

  54. Cury RC, Nieman K, Shapiro MD et al (2008) Comprehensive assessment of myocardial perfusion defects, regional wall motion, and left ventricular function by using 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology 248:466–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Habis M, Capderou A, Ghostine S et al (2007) Acute myocardial infarction early viability assessment by 64-slice computed tomography immediately after coronary angiography: comparison with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:1178–1185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sato A, Hiroe M, Nozato T et al (2008) Early validation study of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability and the prediction of left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 29:490–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Pollak H, Nobis H, Mlczoch J (1994) Frequency of left ventricular free wall rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction since the advent of thrombolysis. Am J Cardiol 74:184–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Slater J, Brown RJ, Antonelli TA et al (2000) Cardiogenic shock due to cardiac free-wall rupture or tamponade after acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock? J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1117–1122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Frances C, Romero A, Grady D (1998) Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:557–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Bekkers SC, Borghans RA, Cheriex EC (2006) Ventricular pseudoaneurysm after subacute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 22:791–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Yeo TC, Malouf JF, Oh JK, Seward JB (1998) Clinical profile and outcome in 52 patients with cardiac pseudoaneurysm. Ann Intern Med 128:299–305

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Angelini P, Velasco JA, Flamm S (2002) Coronary anomalies: incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical relevance. Circulation 105:2449–2454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kim SY, Seo JB, Do KH et al (2006) Coronary artery anomalies: classification and ECG-gated multi-detector row CT findings with angiographic correlation. Radiographics 26:317–333 discussion 333–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Leschka S, Koepfli P, Husmann L et al (2008) Myocardial bridging: depiction rate and morphology at CT coronary angiography-comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Radiology 246:754–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Alegria JR, Herrmann J, Holmes DR Jr, Lerman A, Rihal CS (2005) Myocardial bridging. Eur Heart J 26:1159–1168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Knockaert DC, Buntinx F, Stoens N, Bruyninckx R, Delooz H (2002) Chest pain in the emergency department: the broad spectrum of causes. Eur J Emerg Med 9:25–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Spalding L, Reay E, Kelly C (2003) Cause and outcome of atypical chest pain in patients admitted to hospital. J R Soc Med 96:122–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Frobert O, Fossgreen J, Sondergaard-Petersen J, Hede J, Bagger JP (1999) Musculo-skeletal pathology in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms. J Intern Med 245:237–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Butler KH, Swencki SA (2006) Chest pain: a clinical assessment. Radiol Clin North Am 44:165–179 vii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Misselt AJ, Harris SR, Glockner J, Feng D, Syed IS, Araoz PA (2008) MR Imaging of the Pericardium. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 16:185–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Howarth D, Oldfield G, Booker J, Tan P (2003) Esophageal dysfunction in patients with atypical chest pain investigated with esophageal scintigraphy and myocardial perfusion imaging: an outcome study. J Nucl Cardiol 10:490–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Anastasiadou K, Pilavaki M, Vafiadis E, Petridis A, Drevelengas A (1998) [Boerhaave syndrome: a rare cause of acute thoracic pain]. Pneumologie 52:132–134

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Korantzopoulos P, Pappa E, Dimitroula V et al (2005) ST-segment elevation pattern and myocardial injury induced by acute pancreatitis. Cardiology 103:128–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Munk EM, Drewes AM, Gorst-Rasmussen A, Gregersen H, Funch-Jensen P, Norgard B (2007) Risk of peptic ulcer, oesophagitis, pancreatitis or gallstone in patients with unexplained chest/epigastric pain and normal upper endoscopy: a 10-year Danish cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 25:1203–1210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study has been supported by the National Center of Competence in Research, Computer-Aided, and Image-Guided Medical Interventions of the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Radiology, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland

    Thomas Frauenfelder, Philippe Appenzeller, Christoph Karlo, Hans Scheffel, Lotus Desbiolles, Paul Stolzmann, Borut Marincek, Hatem Alkadhi & Thomas Schertler

Authors
  1. Thomas Frauenfelder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philippe Appenzeller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christoph Karlo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hans Scheffel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lotus Desbiolles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Paul Stolzmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Borut Marincek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hatem Alkadhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Thomas Schertler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Frauenfelder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frauenfelder, T., Appenzeller, P., Karlo, C. et al. Triple rule-out CT in the emergency department: protocols and spectrum of imaging findings. Eur Radiol 19, 789–799 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1231-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1231-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation