Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Usefulness of lesion image mapping with multidetector-row helical computed tomography using a dedicated skin marker in breast-conserving surgery

  • Breast
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the usefulness of computed tomography (CT) with skin-marker placement in determining the excision area and decreasing the positive or close margin rates in breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Multidetector-row helical computed tomography (MDCT) mapping images were reconstructed in subjects (n = 117) diagnosed with primary breast cancer who had undergone MDCT using CT skin markers. Serial 5-mm-thick slices prepared from the surgical specimen were used for pathological analyses. A “positive margin” was defined as the presence of malignant cells at the surgical margin, and a “close margin” as a tumor within 5 mm of the surgical margin. The rates of positive and close margins were calculated. We identified the lesions in 111 of 117 cases (94.9%) on MDCT. Of these, 93 underwent BCS under the guidance of MDCT mapping and the remaining 18 underwent mastectomy. Among the 93 cases, 6 (6.5%) had positive or close margins and were diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of low nuclear grade. MDCT mapping with a CT skin marker is feasible for simulating surgical positioning and determining the excision area. MDCT mapping could decrease the positive and close margin rates in BCS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3a–d
Fig. 4a–d

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singletary SE (2002) Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 184:383–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Inoue T, Tamaki Y, Hamada S et al (2005) Usefulness of three-dimensional multidetector-row CT images for preoperative evaluation of tumor extension in primary breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89:119–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg 198:190–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brand IR, Sapherson DA, Brown TS (1993) Breast imaging in women under 35 with symptomatic breast disease. Br J Radiol 66:394–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL et al (1993) MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 187:493–501

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH (1994) Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 190:485–493

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Esserman L, Hylton N, George T, Weidner N (1999) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to assess tumor histopathology and angiogenesis in breast carcinoma. Breast J 5:13–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, Barclay J, Frankel S, Sickles E (1999) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol 17:110–119

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Akashi-Tanaka S, Fukutomi T, Miyakawa K, Uchiyama N, Tsuda H (1998) Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing the intraductal component of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 49:79–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Uematsu T, Sano M, Homma K, Shiiba M, Kobayashi S (2001) Three-dimensional helical CT of the breast: accuracy for measuring extent of breast cancer candidates for breast conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 65:249–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tozaki M, Kawakami M, Suzuki M, Uchida K, Yamashita A, Fukuda K (2003) Diagnosis of Tis/T1 breast cancer extent by multislice helical CT: a novel classification of tumor distribution. Radiat Med 21:187–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Uematsu T, Sano M, Homma K, Sato N (2004) Value of three-dimensional helical CT image-guided planning for made-to-order lumpectomy in breast cancer patients. Breast J 10:33–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Makino H, Sano M, Uematsu T et al (1998) Role of image diagnosis in breast conserving surgery—simulation of surgery using helical CT. Jpn J Breast Cancer 13:447–453

    Google Scholar 

  14. Iwase T (2004) A decision on the extent of breast resection in breast-conserving surgery. Jpn J Clin Surg 59:1123–1128

    Google Scholar 

  15. Makita M, Gomi N, Tachikawa T et al (2004) CT guided thermoplastic assisted segmentectomy. Jpn J Breast Cancer 19:142–149

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shimauchi A, Yamada T, Sato A et al (2006) Comparison of MDCT and MRI for evaluating the intraductal component of breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 187:322–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y (2008) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector row computed tomography, ultrasonography, and mammography for tumor extension of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi:10.1007/s10549-008-9890-y

  18. Nakahara H, Namba K, Wakamatsu H et al (2002) Extension of breast cancer: comparison of CT and MRI. Radiat Med 20:17–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hiramatsu H, Enomoto K, Ikeda et al (1999) Three-dimensional helical CT for treatment planning of breast cancer. Radiat Med 17:35–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Uematsu T, Sano M, Homma K, Sato N (2002) Comparison between high-resolution helical CT and pathology in breast examination. Acta Radiol 43:385–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosen EL, Smith-Foley SA, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2007) BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J 13:545–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Davidson T et al (1997) Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 169:417–424

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamauchi C, Mitsumori M, Sai H et al (2007) Patterns of care study of breast-conserving therapy in Japan: comparison of the treatment process between 1995–1997 and 1999–2001 surveys. Jpn J Clin Oncol 37:737–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I et al (2000) Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg 179:81–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ciccarelli G, Di Virgilio MR, Menna S et al (2007) Radiography of the surgical specimen in early stage breast lesions: diagnostic reliability in the analysis of the resection margins. Radiol Med (Torino) 112:366–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Amemiya A, Kondo M (1999) Breast conservation therapy based on liberal selection criteria and less extensive surgery analysis of cases with positive margins. Jpn J Breast Cancer 14:324–331

    Google Scholar 

  27. Akashi-Tanaka S, Fukutomi T, Miyakawa K et al (2001) Contrast-enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing the intraductal component and small invasive foci of breast cancer. Breast Cancer 8:10–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Maeda Y, Hata Y, Matsuoka S et al (2004) Utility of three-dimensional helical CT in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Jpn J Surg Assoc 65:581–586

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff at the Department of Radiology for technical assistance in manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narumi Harada-Shoji.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harada-Shoji, N., Yamada, T., Ishida, T. et al. Usefulness of lesion image mapping with multidetector-row helical computed tomography using a dedicated skin marker in breast-conserving surgery. Eur Radiol 19, 868–874 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1220-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1220-6

Keywords

Navigation