Skip to main content
Log in

Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions

  • Breast
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of sonoelastography in differentiating benign from malignant non-palpable breast lesions. A total of 293 BI-RADS 3–5 (Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System) impalpable breast lesions in 278 women was evaluated with B-mode ultrasound (US) and subsequently with sonoelastography (SE) before performing US-guided biopsy. Among the 293 lesions (size up to 2 cm), 110 (37.5%) were histologically malignant and 183 (62.5%) benign. Lesions that were malignant or showed atypical ductal hyperplasia were referred for surgical excision, as well as 32 benign lesions showing discordance between US/SE results and histology. All other benign lesions had US follow-up at 6/12 months, showing stability. Overall performance of SE was lower than US, with sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 80.9%, respectively, for SE as compared with 95.4% and 87.4% for US. Statistical analysis showed no improvement in the joint use of SE and US over the use of US alone, whose performance, however, was very high in our study. SE is a simple, fast and non-invasive diagnostic method that may be a useful aid to US for less experienced radiologists in the assessment of solid non-palpable breast lesions, especially BI-RADS 3, where specificity was higher (88.7%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blohmer JU, Oellinger H, Schmidt C, Hufnagl P, Felix R, Lichtenegger W (1999) Comparison of various imaging methods with particular evaluation of color Doppler sonography for planning surgery of breast tumors. Arch Gynecol Obstet 262:159–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schroeder RJ, Bostanjoglo M, Rademaker J, Maeurer J, Felix R (2003) Role of power Doppler techniques and ultrasound contrast enhancement in the differential diagnosis of focal breast lesions. Eur Radiol 13:68–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA (1995) Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196:123–134

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tardivon AA, Guinebretiere JM, Dromain C, Vanel D (2002) Imaging and management of nonpalpable lesions of the breast. Eur J Radiol 42:2–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zonderland HM, Hermans J, Coerkamp EG (2000) Ultrasound variables and their prognostic value in a population of 1,103 patients with 272 breast cancers. Eur Radiol 10:1562–1568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), ultrasound. 4th edn. ACR, Reston, VA. Available at: http://www.acr.org

  7. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yadzi Y, Li X (1991) Elastosonography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imag 13:11–134

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, Spratt SR, Zuurbier RA, Magnant CM, Pennanen MF (1997) Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology 202:79–86

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, Yamakawa M, Matsamura T (2006) Breast disease: Clinical application of US Elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239:341–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giuseppetti GM, Martegani A, Di Cioccio B, Baldassarre S (2005) Elastosonografia nella caratterizzazione delle lesioni nodulari della mammella/Elastosonography in the diagnosis of the nodular breast lesions: preliminary report. Radiol Med 110:69–76

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas A, Kummel S, Fritzsche F, Warm M, Ebert B, Hamm B, Fischer T (2006) Real-time sonoelastography performed in addition to B-Mode ultrasound and mammography: improved differentiation of breast lesions? Acad Radiol 13:1496–1504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Locatelli M, Rizzatto G, Aiani L, Martegani A, Baldassarre S, Giuseppetti GM, Bulzacchi A, Di Maggio C, Della Sala SW, Mangialavori G, Monno P, Lattanzio E, Scaperrotta G, Floriani I (2007) Characterization of breast lesions with real-time sonoelastography: results from the Italian Multicenter clinical trial. Eur Radiol 17(Suppl 1):200 (ECR 2007 – Book of abstracts)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hughes LE, Mansel RE, Webster DJT (1987) Aberrations of normal development and involution (ANDI): a new perspective on pathogenesis and nomenclature of benign breast disorders. Lancet 2:1316–1319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839–843

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hiltawsky KK, Kruger M, Starke C, Heuser L, Ermert H, Jensen A (2001) Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions: clinical results. Ultrasound Med Biol 27:1461–1469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Konofagou EE (2004) Quo vadis elasticity imaging? Ultrasonics 42:331–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ueno E, Iboraki P (2004) Clinical application of US elastography in the diagnosis of breast disease. European Congress of Radiology, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sarvazyan AP, Skovoroda AR, Emelianov SY et al (1995) Biophysical bases of elasticity imaging. Acoustical Imaging 21:223–240

    Google Scholar 

  20. Walz M, Teubner J, Georgi M et al (1993) Elasticity of benign and malignant breast lesion: imaging, application and results in clinical and general practice. 8th International Congress on the Ultrasonic Examination of the breast

  21. Sewell CW (1995) Pathology of benign and malignant breast disorders. Radiol Clin North Am 33(6):1067–1080

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tardivon AA, Delignette A, Lemery S, Baratte B, Levy L, David P, Le Mouel A, Balu-Maestro C, Scheffer B (2006) Ultrasound elastography: results of a French multicentric prospective study about 345 breast lesions. Eur Radiol 16(Suppl 1):213

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianfranco Scaperrotta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scaperrotta, G., Ferranti, C., Costa, C. et al. Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol 18, 2381–2389 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1032-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1032-8

Keywords

Navigation