Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An MRI-based technique for assessment of lower extremity deformities—reproducibility, accuracy, and clinical application

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hypothesis of this study was that length, torsion, and axis of a leg phantom can be measured accurately and reproducibly by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and that this can be applied to patients with leg deformities. Two phantoms and 30 patients (genu varum, n = 15; genu valgum, n = 15) were investigated using an optimized MRI technique. Reference measurements were performed with a micrometer screw and a goniometer. Patient leg length and axis were compared with long radiographs in bipedal stance. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility and accuracy were calculated using the mean absolute difference (MAD) and the 95% confidence interval. In patients, comparisons were done using a paired Student’s t-test. MAD, intraobserver MAD, and interobserver MAD were 0.03, 0.03, 0.04 mm (length); 0.98, 1.2, 0.98° (torsion); and 0.18, 0.23, 0.22° (axis), respectively. In patients, leg length was underestimated by MRI (−2.4 ± 0.7%; 1.9 ± 0.7 cm; P < 0.001). The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) did not show significant differences in varus knees (−0.5 ± 1.0°; P > 0.05), while it was significantly underestimated in valgus knees (−3.6 ± 2.8°; P < 0.05). The phantom study revealed that leg length, torsion, and axis can be measured accurately and reproducibly by MRI. Although underestimation of leg length and HKA in valgus knees occurred, this optimized MRI technique can be applied to patients with leg deformities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paley D, Tetsworth K (1992) Mechanical axis deviation of the lower limbs. Preoperative planning of uniapical angular deformities of the tibia or femur. Clin Orthop 280:48–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Paley D, Tetsworth K (1992) Mechanical axis deviation of the lower limbs. Preoperative planning of multiapical frontal plane angular and bowing deformities of the femur and tibia. Clin Orthop 280:65–71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, McKie J, Bhave A (1994) Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am 25:425–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Keppler P, Strecker W, Kinzl L (1999) CT determination of leg length and torsion in children and adolescents. Unfallchirurg 102:936–941

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Keppler P, Strecker W, Kinzl L, Simmnacher M, Claes L (1999) Sonographic imaging of leg geometry. Orthopade 28:1015–1022

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Strecker W, Keppler P, Gebhard F, Kinzl L (1997) Length and torsion of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:1019–1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Terjesen T, Benum P, Rossvoll I, Svenningsen S, Floystad Isern AE, Nordbo T (1991) Leg-length discrepancy measured by ultrasonography. Acta Orthop Scand 62:121–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van der Schoot DK, Den Outer AJ, Bode PJ, Obermann WR, van Vugt AB (1996) Degenerative changes at the knee and ankle related to malunion of tibial fractures. 15-year follow-up of 88 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:722–725

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leitzes AH, Potter HG, Amaral T, Marx RG, Lyman S, Widmann RF (2005) Reliability and accuracy of MRI scanogram in the evaluation of limb length discrepancy. J Pediatr Orthop 25:747–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tomczak RJ, Guenther KP, Rieber A, Mergo P, Ros PR, Brambs HJ (1997) MR imaging measurement of the femoral antetorsional angle as a new technique: comparison with CT in children and adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:791–794

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Synder M, Vera J, Harcke HT, Bowen JR (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of the growth plate in late-onset tibia vara. Int Orthop 27:217–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aamodt A, Terjesen T, Eine J, Kvistad KA (1995) Femoral anteversion measured by ultrasound and CT: a comparative study. Skelet Radiol 24:105–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keats TE, Teeslink R, Diamond AE, Williams JH (1966) Normal axial relationships of the major joints. Radiology 87:904–907

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hsu RWW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EYS (1990) Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Rel Research 255:215–227

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 346:1085–1087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bland JM, Altman DG (1990) A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med 20:337–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wright JG, Treble N, Feinstein AR (1991) Measurement of lower limb alignment using long radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:721–723

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koshino T, Takeyama M, Jiang LS, Yoshida T, Saito T (2002) Underestimation of varus angulation in knees with flexion deformity. Knee 9:275–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lang P, Genant HK, Jergesen HE, Murray WR (1992) Imaging of the hip joint. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop 274:135–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sabharwal S, Zhao C, McKeon J, Melaghari T, Blacksin M, Wenekor C (2007) Reliability analysis for radiographic measurement of limb length discrepancy: full-length standing anteroposterior radiograph versus scanogram. J Pediatr Orthop 27:46–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Terry MA, Winell JJ, Green DW, Schneider R, Peterson M, Marx RG, Widmann RF (2005) Measurement variance in limb length discrepancy: clinical and radiographic assessment of interobserver and intraobserver variability. J Pediatr Orthop 25:197–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cleveland RH, Kushner DC, Ogden MC, Herman TE, Kermond W, Correia JA (1988) Determination of leg length discrepancy. A comparison of weight-bearing and supine imaging. Invest Radiol 23:301–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brouwer RW, Jakma TS, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Ginai AZ, Verhaar JA (2003) The whole leg radiograph: standing versus supine for determining axial alignment. Acta Orthop Scand 74:565–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fishkin Z, Miller D, Ritter C, Ziv I (2002) Changes in human knee ligament stiffness secondary to osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res 20:204–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Markolf KL, Mensch JS, Amstutz HC (1976) Stiffness and laxity of the knee - the contributions of the supporting structures. A quantitative in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:583–594

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Saeki K, Mihalko WM, Patel V et al (2001) Stability after medial collateral ligament release in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392:184–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Patel VV, Hall K, Ries M, Lotz J, Ozhinsky E, Lindsey C, Lu Y, Majumdar S (2004) A three-dimensional MRI analysis of knee kinematics. J Orthop Res 22:283–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the Deutsche Arthrosehilfe for supporting this study. Additionally, we thank Ulf Henkemeier and Adel Maataoui for support in data acquisition and Monika Kriner for statistical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Group for Kinematics and Biomechanics, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Frankfurt, Marienburgstr. 2, 60528, Frankfurt, Germany

    Stefan Hinterwimmer & Heiko Graichen

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Connollystr. 32, 80809, München, Germany

    Stefan Hinterwimmer

  3. Asklepios Clinic for Orthopedics and Traumatology Lindenlohe, Lindenlohe 18, 92421, Schwandorf, Germany

    Heiko Graichen

  4. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, JW Goethe University of Frankfurt, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany

    Thomas J. Vogl & Nasreddin Abolmaali

  5. OncoRay - Molecular Imaging, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, PF 86, 01307, Dresden, Germany

    Nasreddin Abolmaali

Authors
  1. Stefan Hinterwimmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heiko Graichen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas J. Vogl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nasreddin Abolmaali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nasreddin Abolmaali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hinterwimmer, S., Graichen, H., Vogl, T.J. et al. An MRI-based technique for assessment of lower extremity deformities—reproducibility, accuracy, and clinical application. Eur Radiol 18, 1497–1505 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0896-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0896-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation