Abstract
The combination of functional and morphological imaging technologies such as positron emission tomography (PET) and X-ray computed tomography (CT) has shown its value in the clinical and preclinical field. However, CT provides only very limited soft-tissue contrast and exposes the examined patient or laboratory animal to a high X-ray radiation dose. In comparison to CT, magnetic resonance tomography (MRI) provides excellent soft-tissue contrast and allows for nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMRS) or functional MRI (fMRI). Thus, the combination of PET and MRI has been pursued for several years. First approaches have succeeded using conventional photo multiplier tube (PMT) technology together with light fibers to transfer scintillation light away from the high magnetic field. Latest PET/MRI developments use solid-state light detectors that can be operated even at high magnetic fields. Initial pilot studies with prototype animal PET/MRI systems have shown promising results by combining high resolution morphology with multifunctional information isochronously.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pietrzyk U, Herholz K, Heiss WD (1990) Three-dimensional alignment of functional and morphological tomograms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 14(1):51–59
Slomka PJ (2004) Software approach to merging molecular with anatomic information. J Nucl Med 45(Suppl 1):36S–45S
Pelizzari CA et al (1989) Accurate three-dimensional registration of CT, PET, and/or MR images of the brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13(1):20–26
Myers R (2002) The application of PET-MR image registration in the brain. Br J Radiol 75(Spec No):S31–S35
Kapouleas I et al (1991) Registration of three-dimensional MR and PET images of the human brain without markers. Radiology 181(3):731–739
Goerres GW et al (2003) PET/CT of the abdomen: optimizing the patient breathing pattern. Eur Radiol 13:734–739
Somer EJ et al (2003) PET-MR image fusion in soft tissue sarcoma: accuracy, reliability and practicality of interactive point-based and automated mutual information techniques. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30(1):54–62
Townsend DW (2001) A combined PET/CT scanner: the choices. J Nucl Med 42(3):533–534
Beyer T et al (2000) A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 41(8):1369–1379
Pfannenberg AC et al (2007) Value of contrast-enhanced multi-phase CT in combined PET/CT protocols for oncological imaging. Br J Radiol 80(954):437–445
Ell PJ (2005) PET/CT in oncology: a major technology for cancer care. Chang Gung Med J 28(5):274–283
Bar-Shalom R et al (2003) Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med 44(8):1200–1209
Antoch G et al (2004) Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol 22(21):4357–4368
Ell PJ, von Schulthess GK (2002) PET/CT: a new road map. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29(6):719–720
Townsend DW et al (2004) PET/CT today and tomorrow. J Nucl Med 45(Suppl 1):4S–14S
Brix G et al (2005) Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations. J Nucl Med 46(4):608–613
Muller-Horvat C et al (2006) Prospective comparison of the impact on treatment decisions of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Eur J Cancer 42(3):342–350
Townsend DW, Beyer T, Blodgett TM (2003) PET/CT scanners: a hardware approach to image fusion. Semin Nucl Med 33(3):193–204
Schmand M et al (2007) BrainPET: first human tomograph for simultaneous (functional) PET and MR imaging. J Nucl Med 48(Suppl):45P
Schlemmer HP et al (2007) Simultaneous MR/PET for brain imaging: dirst patient scans. J Nucl Med 48(Suppl):45P
Casey ME, Nutt R (1986) A multicrystal two dimensional BGO detector system for positron emission tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 33:460–463
Surti S et al (2007) Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. J Nucl Med 48(3):471–480
Teras M et al (2007) Performance of the new generation of whole-body PET/CT scanners: Discovery STE and Discovery VCT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34(10):1683–1692
Martinez MJ et al (2006) PET/CT Biograph Sensation 16. Performance improvement using faster electronics. Nuklearmediziner 45(3):126–133
Chatziioannou AF et al (1999) Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging. J Nucl Med 40(7):1164–1175
Tai C et al (2001) Performance evaluation of the microPET P4: a PET system dedicated to animal imaging. Phys Med Biol 46(7):1845–1862
Tai YC et al (2003) MicroPET II: design, development and initial performance of an improved microPET scanner for small-animal imaging. Phys Med Biol 48(11):1519–1537
Tai YC et al (2005) Performance evaluation of the microPET focus: a third-generation microPET scanner dedicated to animal imaging. J Nucl Med 46(3):455–463
Huisman MC et al (2006) Performance evaluation of the Philips MOSAIC small animal PET scanner. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34(4):532–540
Pichler B et al (1998) Studies with a prototype high resolution PET scanner based on LSO-APD modules. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 45(3):1298–1302
Pichler BJ et al (2004) Lutetium oxyorthosilicate block detector readout by avalanche photodiode arrays for high resolution animal PET. Phys Med Biol 49(18):4305–4319
Lecomte R et al (1996) Initial results from the Sherbrooke avalanche photodiode positron tomograph. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 43(3):1952–1957
Pichler B et al (1998) Performance test of a LSO-APD PET module in a 9.4 Tesla magnet. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Med Imaging Conf Iss 2:1237–1239
Schenck JF (1996) The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 23(6):815–850
Camacho CR, Plewes DB, Henkelman RM (1995) Nonsusceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects in MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 5(1):75–88
Graaf D (1998) In-vivo NMR spectroscopy: principles and techniques, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester
Graf H et al (2006) Effects on MRI due to altered rf polarization near conductive implants or instruments. Med Phys 33(1):124–127
Price RR et al (1990) Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1. Med Phys 17(2):287–295
Graf H et al (2005) RF artifacts caused by metallic implants or instruments which get more prominent at 3 T: an in vitro study. Magn Reson Imaging 23(3):493–499
Yamamoto S, Kuroda K, Senda M (2002) Scintillator selection for MR compatible gamma detectors. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec 3:1632–1635
Strul D et al (2003) Gamma shielding materials for MR-compatible PET. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 50(1):60
Mackewn JE et al (2005) Design and development of an MR-compatible PET scanner for imaging small animals. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 52(5):1376
Pichler BJ et al (2006) Performance test of an LSO-APD detector in a 7-T MRI scanner for simultaneous PET/MRI. J Nucl Med 47(4):639–647
Shao Y et al (1997) Development of a PET detector system compatible with MRI/NMR systems. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 44(3):1167–1171
Cherry SR et al (1996) Optical fiber readout of scintillator arrays using a multi-channel PMT: a high resolution PET detector for animal imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 43(3):1932–1937
Marsden PK, Strul D, Keevil SF, Williams SCR, Cash D (2002) Simultaneous PET and NMR. Br J Radiol 75(Spec No):S53–S59
Raylman RR et al (2006) Simultaneous MRI and PET imaging of a rat brain. Phys Med Biol 51(24):6371–6639
Kinahan PE et al (1998) Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med Phys 25(10):2046–2053
Ostertag H et al (1989) Measured attenuation correction methods. Eur J Nucl Med 15(11):722–726
Zaidi H, Montandon ML, Slosman DO (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation and scatter corrections in three-dimensional brain positron emission tomography. Med Phys 30(5):937–948
Zavaljevski A et al (2000) Multi-level adaptive segmentation of multi-parameter MR brain images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 24(2):87–98
Montandon ML, Zaidi H (2005) Atlas-guided non-uniform attenuation correction in cerebral 3D PET imaging. Neuroimage 25(1):278–286
Catana C, Wu Y, Judenhofer MS, Qi J, Pichler BJ, Cherry SR (2006) Simultaneous acquisition of multislice PET and MR images: initial results with a MR-compatible PET scanner. J Nucl Med 47(12):1968–1976
Judenhofer MS, Catana C, Swann BK, et al (2007) Simultaneous PET/MR images, acquired with a compact MRI compatible PET detector in a 7 Tesla magnet. Radiology 244(3):807–814
Garlick PB et al (1997) PET and NMR dual acquisition (PANDA): applications to isolated, perfused rat hearts. NMR Biomed 10(3):138–142
Lucas AJ et al (2006) Development of a combined microPET-MR system. Technol Cancer Res Treat 5(4):337–341
Gilbert KM et al (2006) Design of field-cycled magnetic resonance systems for small animal imaging. Phys Med Biol 51(11):2825–2841
Handler WB et al (2006) Simulation of scattering and attenuation of 511 keV photons in a combined PET/field-cycled MRI system. Phys Med Biol 51(10):2479–2491
Pichler BJ et al (2001) A 4 x 8 APD Array, consisting of two monolithic silicon wafers, coupled to a 32-channel LSO matrix for high-resolution PET. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 48(4):1391–1396
Shah KS et al (2002) Position-sensitive avalanche photodiodes for gamma-ray imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 49(4):1687
Habte F et al (2007) Effects of system geometry and other physical factors on photon sensitivity of high-resolution positron emission tomography. Phys Med Biol 52(13):3753–3772
Callaghan P (1991) Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy. Oxford Science, Oxford
Jacobs RE, Cherry SR (2001) Complementary emerging techniques: high-resolution PET and MRI. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11(5):621–629
Tyszka JM, Fraser SE, Jacobs RE (2005) Magnetic resonance microscopy: recent advances and applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16(1):93–99
Hammer BE, Christensen NL, Heil BG (1994) Use of a magnetic field to increase the spatial resolution of positron emission tomography. Med Phys 21(12):1917–1920
Boone JM, Velazquez O, Cherry SR (2004) Small-animal X-ray dose from micro-CT. Mol Imaging 3(3):149–158
Lamare F et al (2007) Respiratory motion correction for PET oncology applications using affine transformation of list mode data. Phys Med Biol 52(1):121–140
Catana C, Wu Y, Judenhofer MS, Qi J, Pichler BJ, Cherry SR (2006) Simultaneous acquisition of multislice PET and MR images: initial results with a MR-compatible PET scanner. J Nucl Med 47(12):1968–1976
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pichler, B.J., Judenhofer, M.S. & Wehrl, H.F. PET/MRI hybrid imaging: devices and initial results. Eur Radiol 18, 1077–1086 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0857-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0857-5