European Radiology

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 747–752 | Cite as

Flat panel computed tomography for non-invasive flow measurement: initial results in in-vitro studies

  • Andreas H. MahnkenEmail author
  • Michael Grasruck
  • Bernhard Schmidt
  • Rolf W. Günther
  • Joachim E. Wildberger


The purpose was to evaluate the feasibility of flat panel computed tomography (FPCT) for quantifying flow by analyzing contrast changes along the z-axis in an in-vitro setting. Contrast material was injected in a 3-mm silicone tube at flow rates of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 and 1.0 ml/s using a commercially available injector pump. FPCT scans of this phantom were performed with a gantry rotation time of 3 s. From this data 41 phases were reconstructed at different points in time using a full and a partial gantry rotation. The differences in the contrast material arrival time and the contrast enhancement along the z-axis were recorded. Flow was calculated from this data and compared to the injector settings. There was a good agreement between the injector settings and the calculated flow rates, but agreement decreased with increasing flow rates. Absolute (percent) mean deviation between the injector settings and calculated flow values was 0.0230 ± 0.0489ml/s (3.7243 ± 4.7817%) using the full gantry rotation. Repeated-measurement ANOVA failed to show significant differences between the various techniques (p = 0.9726). FPCT allows for computing flow. While preliminary results indicate a good agreement at low flow rates, further studies are needed to assess this technique for higher flow rates.


Tomography X-ray computed Blood flow velocity Blood vessels 


  1. 1.
    Youn HJ, Foster E (2004) Demonstration of coronary artery flow using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17:178–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hundley WG, Lange RA, Clarke GD, Meshack BM, Payne J, Landau C, McColl R, Sayad DE, Willett DL, Willard JE, Hillis LD, Peshock RM (1996) Assessment of coronary arterial flow and flow reserve in humans with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 93:1502–1508PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schoepf UJ, Bruening R, Konschitzky H, Becker CR, Knez A, Weber J, Muehling O, Herzog P, Huber A, Haberl R, Reiser MF (2000) Pulmonary embolism: comprehensive diagnosis by using electron-beam CT for detection of emboli and assessment of pulmonary blood flow. Radiology 217:693–700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wong JT, Ducote JL, Xu T, Hassanein MT, Molloi S (2006) Automated technique for angiographic determination of coronary blood flow and lumen volume. Acad Radiol 13:186–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nabavi DG, Cenic A, Craen RA, Gelb AW, Bennett JD, Kozak R, Lee TY (1999) CT assessment of cerebral perfusion: experimental validation and initial clinical experience. Radiology 213:141–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahnken AH, Henzler D, Klotz E, Hennemuth A, Wildberger JE, Gunther RW (2004) Determination of cardiac output with multislice spiral computed tomography: a validation study. Invest Radiol 39:451–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Hennemuth A, Jung B, Koos R, Wildberger JE, Günther RW (2003) Measurement of cardiac output from a test-bolus injection in multislice spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol 13:2498–2504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tomandl BF, Klotz E, Handschu R, Stemper B, Reinhardt F, Huk WJ, Eberhardt KE, Fateh-Moghadam S (2003) Comprehensive Imaging of Ischemic Stroke with Multisection CT. RadioGraphics 23:565–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Axel L (1980) Cerebral blood flow determination by rapid-sequence computed tomography: theoretical analysis. Radiology 137:679–686PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doriot PA, Dorsaz PA, Dorsaz L, Rutishauser WJ (1997) Is the indicator dilution theory really the adequate base of many blood flow measurement techniques? Med Phys 24:1889–1898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gupta R, Grasruck M, Suess C, Bartling SH, Schmidt B, Stierstorfer K, Popescu S, Brady T, Flohr T (2006) Ultra-high resolution flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, design architecture, and system characterization. Eur Radiol 16:1191–1205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Murphy WR, Olin JW, Puschett JB, Rosenfield KA, Sacks D, Stanley JC, Taylor LM Jr, White CJ, White J, White RA, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B, American Association for Vascular Surgery, Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Society for Vascular Nursing, TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus, Vascular Disease Foundation (2006) ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): executive summary a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease) endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1239–1312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kern MJ (2000) Coronary physiology revisited: practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Circulation 101:1344–1351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fronek A, Criqui MH, Denenberg J, Langer RD (2001) Common femoral vein dimensions and hemodynamics including Valsalva response as a function of sex, age, and ethnicity in a population study. J Vasc Surg 33:1050–1056PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sudhamshu KC, Matsutani S, Maruyama H, Akiike T, Saisho H (2006) Doppler study of hepatic vein in cirrhotic patients: correlation with liver dysfunction and hepatic hemodynamics. World J Gastroenterol 12:5853–5958PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, Hiratza LF, Eastham CL, Harrison DG, Marcus ML (1984) Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 310:819–824PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meier D, Maier S, Boesiger P (1988) Quantitative flow measurements on phantoms and on blood vessels with MR. Magn Reson Med 8:25–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miles KA, Griffiths MR (2003) Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement? Br J Radiol 76:220–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shi BM, Wang XY, Mu QL, Wu TH, Xu J (2005) Value of portal hemodynamics and hypersplenism in cirrhosis staging. World J Gastroenterol 11:708–711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Isenberg JS, Sherman R (1996) The limited value of preoperative angiography in microsurgical reconstruction of the lower limb. J Reconstr Microsurg 12:303–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas H. Mahnken
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Michael Grasruck
    • 2
  • Bernhard Schmidt
    • 2
  • Rolf W. Günther
    • 1
  • Joachim E. Wildberger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyRWTH-Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Siemens Medical Solutions, Computed TomographyForchheimGermany
  3. 3.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyUniversity Hospital, RWTH-Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations