European Radiology

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 743–746 | Cite as

Using an electrode as a lever to increase the distance between renal cell carcinoma and bowel during CT-guided radiofrequency ablation

  • Byung Kwan ParkEmail author
  • Chan Kyo Kim


The technique of using an electrode as a lever to increase the distance between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and bowel during CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is described. CT-guided percutaneous RFA was performed in two patients with two RCCs, which were in close proximity to the adjacent bowel. A sterile drape was placed on the electrode handle following appropriate electrode placement within the tumor in order to displace the kidney upward and to widen the distance to >5 mm between RCC and bowel (RCC-to-bowel distance). In patient 1, the RCC-to-bowel distance increased from 3 mm to 6 mm; in patient 2, from less than 2 mm to 6 mm. Follow-up CT performed 1 month after RFA demonstrated not only complete ablation of the two RCCs but also no thermal injury to the bowel adjacent to the tumors. In conclusion, an electrode might be used as a lever to increase RCC-to-bowel distance during CT-guided RFA by placing a sterile drape on it.


Radiofrequency ablation Computed tomography Renal cell carcinoma 


  1. 1.
    Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Arellano RS, McDougal WS, Mueller PR (2005) Radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: part 1, Indications, results, and role in patient management over a 6-year period and ablation of 100 tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:64–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Livraghi T, Solbiati L, Meloni MF, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, Goldberg SN (2003) Treatment of focal liver tumors with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: complications encountered in a multicenter study. Radiology 226:441–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farrell MA, Charboneau JW, Callstrom MR, Reading CC, Engen DE, Blute ML (2003) Paranephric water instillation: a technique to prevent bowel injury during percutaneous renal radiofrequency ablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1315–1317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kam AW, Littrup PJ, Walther MM, Hvizda J, Wood BJ (2004) Thermal protection during percutaneous thermal ablation of renal cell carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:753–758PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen EA, Neeman Z, Lee FT, Kam A, Wood B (2006) Thermal protection with 5% dextrose solution blanket during radiofrequency ablation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29:1093–1096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boss A, Clasen S, Kuczyk M, Anastasiadis A, Schmidt D, Claussen CD, Schick F, Pereira PL (2005) Thermal damage of the genitofemoral nerve due to radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: a potentially avoidable complication. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1627–1631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rhim H, Dodd GD 3rd, Chintapalli KN, Wood BJ, Dupuy DE, Hvizda JL, Sewell PE, Goldberg SN (2004) Radiofrequency thermal ablation of abdominal tumors: lessons learned from complications. Radiographics 24:41–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bosniak MA (1986) The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 158:1–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silverman SG, Tuncali K, vanSonnenberg E, Morrison PR, Shankar S, Ramaiya N, Richie JP (2005) Renal tumors: MR imaging-guided percutaneous cryotherapy–initial experience in 23 patients. Radiology 236:716–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations