Skip to main content
Log in

Re-evaluation of pheochromocytomas on delayed contrast-enhanced CT: washout enhancement and other imaging features

  • Urogenital
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the enhancement washout and other imaging features of pheochromocytomas on delayed contrast-enhanced CT. Twenty-four patients with 31 pathologically confirmed pheochromocytomas were examined using unenhanced, early and delayed contrast-enhanced CT. The range of their APEW (absolute percentage of enhancement washout) or RPEW (relative PEW) values was analyzed. The other CT features including cystic or necrotic change, calcification, and hemorrhage were also determined by a pathologic correlation. Of the 31 pheochromocytomas, 10 (32%) had APEW values of 60% or less and RPEW values of 40% or less. Fourteen (45%) had APEW values >60% and RPEW values >40%. CT showed cystic or necrotic changes in 11 pheochromocytomas (35%) and calcification (10%) in 3. Nineteen pheochromocytomas showed cystic or necrotic changes on early contrast-enhanced CT, but eight of these lesions showed late enhancement on delayed contrast-enhanced CT, which pathologically corresponded to myxoid degeneration. The unenhanced CT showed hemorrhage in 23 pheochromocytomas, but the pathology examinations showed hemorrhage in 15 lesions. Many pheochromocytomas can be misdiagnosed as adenomas on CT due to the high enhancement washout values. Delayed contrast-enhanced CT can detect myxoid degeneration with late enhancement, which is seen as a cystic or necrotic change on early contrast-enhanced CT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Witteles RM, Kaplan EL, Roizen MF (2000) Sensitivity of diagnostic and localization tests for pheochromocytoma in clinical practice. Arch Intern Med 160:2521–2524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lucon AM, Pereira MA, Mendonca BB, Halpern A, Wajchenbeg BL, Arap S (1997) Pheochromocytoma: study of 50 cases. J Urol 157:1208–1212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook DM, Loriaux DL (1996) The incidental adrenal mass. Am J Med 101:88–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Szolar DH, Korobkin M, Reittner P, Berghold A, Bauernhofer T, Trummer H, Schoellnast H, Preidler KW, Samonigg H (2005) Adrenocortical carcinomas and adrenal pheochromocytomas: mass and enhancement loss evaluation at delayed contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 234:479–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blake MA, Kalra MK, Maher MM, Sahani DV, Sweeney AT, Mueller PR, Hahn PF, Boland GW (2004) Pheochromocytoma: an imaging chameleon. Radiographics 24 Suppl 1:S87–S99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blake MA, Krishnamoorthy SK, Boland GW, Sweeney AT, Pitman MB, Harisinghani M, Mueller PR, Hahn PF (2003) Low-density pheochromocytoma on CT: a mimicker of adrenal adenoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1663–1668

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Caoili EM, Korobkin M, Francis IR, Cohan RH, Platt JF, Dunnick NR, Raghupathi KI (2002) Adrenal masses: characterization with combined unenhanced and delayed enhanced CT. Radiology 222:629–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalra MK, Blake MA, Boland GW, Hahn PF (2005) CT features of adrenal pheochromocytomas: attenuation value and loss of contrast enhancement. Radiology 236:1112–1113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park BK, Kim B, Ko K, Jeong SY, Kwon GY (2006) Adrenal masses falsely diagnosed as adenomas on unenhanced and delayed contrast-enhanced computed tomography: pathological correlation. Eur Radiol 16:642–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Motta-Ramirez GA, Remer EM, Herts BR, Gill IS, Hamrahian AH (2005) Comparison of CT findings in symptomatic and incidentally discovered pheochromocytomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:684–688

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Young WF Jr (2007) Clinical practice. The incidentally discovered adrenal mass. N Engl J Med 356:601–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bravo EL, Gifford RW Jr (1984) Current concepts. Pheochromocytoma: diagnosis, localization and management. N Engl J Med 311:1298–1303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Szolar DH, Kammerhuber FH (1998) Adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas: assessment of washout at delayed contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 207:369–375

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pena CS, Boland GW, Hahn PF, Lee MJ, Mueller PR (2000) Characterization of indeterminate (lipid-poor) adrenal masses: use of washout characteristics at contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 217:798–802

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Korobkin M, Brodeur FJ, Francis IR, Quint LE, Dunnick NR, Londy F (1998) CT time-attenuation washout curves of adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:747–752

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byung Kwan Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, B.K., Kim, C.K., Kwon, G.Y. et al. Re-evaluation of pheochromocytomas on delayed contrast-enhanced CT: washout enhancement and other imaging features. Eur Radiol 17, 2804–2809 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0695-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0695-x

Keywords

Navigation