Skip to main content

In-vivo flow simulation in coronary arteries based on computed tomography datasets: feasibility and initial results

European Radiology volume 17, pages 1291–1300 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to non-invasively assess hemodynamic parameters such as mass flow, wall shear stress (WSS), and wall pressure with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in coronary arteries using patient-specific data from computed tomography (CT) angiography. Five patients (two without atherosclerosis, three with atherosclerosis) underwent retrospectively electrocardiogram (ECG) gated 16-detector row CT using ECG-pulsing and geometric models of coronary arteries were reconstructed for CFD analysis. Blood flow was considered laminar, incompressible, Newtonian, and pulsatile. The mass flow, WSS, and wall pressure were quantified and flow patterns were visualized. The wall pressure continuously decreased towards distal segments and showed pressure drops in stenotic segments. In coronary segments without atherosclerotic wall changes, WSS remained low, even during phases of high flow velocity, whereas in atherosclerotic vessels, the WSS was elevated already at low flow velocities. Stenoses and post-stenotic dilatations led to flow acceleration and rapid deceleration, respectively, including a distortion of flow. Areas of high WSS and high flow velocities were found adjacent to plaques, with values correlating with the degree of stenosis. CFD provided detailed mass flow measurements. CFD analysis is feasible in normal and atherosclerotic coronary arteries and provides the rationale for further investigation of the links between hemodynamic parameters and the significance of coronary stenoses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Kern MJ, Meier B (2001) Evaluation of the culprit plaque and the physiological significance of coronary atherosclerotic narrowings. Circulation 103(25):3142–3149

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sambuceti G (2005) Differences and similarities between coronary atherosclerosis and ischaemic heart disease: implications for cardiac imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32(4):385–388

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Di Carli M, Czernin J, Hoh CK, Gerbaudo VH, Brunken RC, Huang SC, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR (1995) Relation among stenosis severity, myocardial blood flow, and flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 91(7):1944–1951

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, Hiratza LF, Eastham CL, Harrison DG, Marcus ML (1984) Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 310(13):819–824

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caro CG, Fitz-Gerald JM, Schroter RC (1971) Atheroma and arterial wall shear. Observation, correlation and proposal of a shear dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 177(46):109–159

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Bech GJ, Liistro F, Heyndrickx GR, Bonnier HJ, Koolen JJ (2000) Coronary pressure measurement to assess the hemodynamic significance of serial stenoses within one coronary artery: validation in humans. Circulation 102(19):2371–2377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Krams R, Wentzel JJ, Cespedes I, Vinke R, Carlier S, van der Steen AF, Lancee CT, Slager CJ (1999) Effect of catheter placement on 3-D velocity profiles in curved tubes resembling the human coronary system. Ultrasound Med Biol 25(5):803–810

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shalman E, Rosenfeld M, Dgany E, Einav S (2002) Numerical modeling of the flow in stenosed coronary artery. The relationship between main hemodynamic parameters. Comput Biol Med 32(5):329–344

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Giannoglou GD, Soulis JV, Farmakis TM, Farmakis DM, Louridas GE (2002) Haemodynamic factors and the important role of local low static pressure in coronary wall thickening. Int J Cardiol 86(1):27–40

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Berthier B, Bouzerar R, Legallais C (2002) Blood flow patterns in an anatomically realistic coronary vessel: influence of three different reconstruction methods. J Biomech 35(10):1347–1356

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Santamarina A, Weydahl E, Siegel JM Jr, Moore JE Jr (1998) Computational analysis of flow in a curved tube model of the coronary arteries: effects of time-varying curvature. Ann Biomed Eng 26(6):944–954

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boutsianis E, Dave H, Frauenfelder T, Poulikakos D, Wildermuth S, Turina M, Ventikos Y, Zund G (2004) Computational simulation of intracoronary flow based on real coronary geometry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26(2):248–256

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Andersson HI, Halden R, Glomsaker T (2000) Effects of surface irregularities on flow resistance in differently shaped arterial stenoses. J Biomech 33(10):1257–1262

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Birchall D, Zaman A, Hacker J, Davies G, Mendelow D (2006) Analysis of haemodynamic disturbance in the atherosclerotic carotid artery using computational fluid dynamics. Eur Radiol 16(5):1074–1083

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarwal A, Dhawan AP (2001) Three dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries from two views. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 65(1):25–43

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Flohr T, Ohnesorge B (2001) Heart rate adaptive optimization of spatial and temporal resolution for electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral CT of the heart. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25(6):907–923

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Suess C, Schoepf UJ, Reiser MF (2002) Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 12(5):1081–1086

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Husmann L, Alkadhi H, Boehm T, Leschka S, Schepis T, Koepfli P, Desbiolles L, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, Wildermuth S (2006) Influence of cardiac hemodynamic parameters on coronary artery opacification with 64-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 16(5):1111–1116

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lorensen WE, Cline HE (1987) Marching cubes: a high-resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Comput Graph 21(4):163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Berger SA, Goldsmith EW, Lewis ER (2000) Introduction to bioengineering. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  21. Canver CC, Dame NA (1994) Ultrasonic assessment of internal thoracic artery graft flow in the revascularized heart. Ann Thorac Surg 58(1):135–138

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Drost C (2002) On/off pump graft patency assessment. Transonic Systems Inc., Ithaca, New York

  23. Frauenfelder T BE, Ventikos Y, Marincek B, Wildermuth S (2003) Comparison of numerical and experimental flow simulation in patient-specific 3D-models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. In: Annual Meeting and Postgraduate Course of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe-CIRSE., book of abstracts 43.2.7

  24. Frauenfelder T, Lotfey M, Boehm T, Wildermuth S (2006) Computational fluid dynamics: hemodynamic changes in abdominal aortic aneurysm after stent-graft implantation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29(4):613–623

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ku DN (1997) Blood flow in arteries. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 29:399–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hachamovitch R, Hayes S, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Shaw LJ, Germano G, Berman DS (2003) Determinants of risk and its temporal variation in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans: what is the warranty period of a normal scan? J Am Coll Cardiol 41(8):1329–1340

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, Kutcher MA, Burrows MT, Kahl FR, Santamore WP (1988) Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? Circulation 78(5 Pt 1):1157–1166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fuster V, Fallon JT, Badimon JJ, Nemerson Y (1997) The unstable atherosclerotic plaque: clinical significance and therapeutic intervention. Thromb Haemost 78(1):247–255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Topol EJ, Nissen SE (1995) Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 92(8):2333–2342

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grunenfelder J, Marincek B, Wildermuth S (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26(15):1482–1487

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(3):552–557

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, Becker A, Nikolaou K, Paul S, Wintersperger B, Reiser M, Becker CR, Steinbeck G, Boekstegers P (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(1):147–154

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, Runza G, McFadden EP, Baks T, Serruys PW, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112(15):2318–2323

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cunningham KS, Gotlieb AI (2005) The role of shear stress in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Lab Invest 85(1):9–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Perktold K, Hofer M, Rappitsch G, Loew M, Kuban BD, Friedman MH (1998) Validated computation of physiologic flow in a realistic coronary artery branch. J Biomech 31(3):217–228

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. DeBakey ME, Lawrie GM, Glaeser DH (1985) Patterns of atherosclerosis and their surgical significance. Ann Surg 201(2):115–131

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zarins CK, Giddens DP, Bharadvaj BK, Sottiurai VS, Mabon RF, Glagov S (1983) Carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis. Quantitative correlation of plaque localization with flow velocity profiles and wall shear stress. Circ Res 53(4):502–514

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Caro CG, Fitz-Gerald JM, Schroter RC (1969) Arterial wall shear and distribution of early atheroma in man. Nature 223(211):1159–1160

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nagel T, Resnick N, Dewey CF Jr, Gimbrone MA Jr (1999) Vascular endothelial cells respond to spatial gradients in fluid shear stress by enhanced activation of transcription factors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19(8):1825–1834

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Cho A, Mitchell L, Koopmans D, Langille BL (1997) Effects of changes in blood flow rate on cell death and cell proliferation in carotid arteries of immature rabbits. Circ Res 81(3):328–337

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Deng X, Stroman PW, Guidoin R (1996) Theoretical modelling of the release rate of low-density lipoproteins and their breakdown products at arterial stenoses. Clin Invest Med 19(2):83–91

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mohan S, Mohan N, Valente AJ, Sprague EA (1999) Regulation of low shear flow-induced HAEC VCAM-1 expression and monocyte adhesion. Am J Physiol 276(5 Pt 1):C1100–C1107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fry DL (1969) Certain histological and chemical responses of the vascular interface to acutely induced mechanical stress in the aorta of the dog. Circ Res 24(1):93–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Holme PA, Orvim U, Hamers MJ, Solum NO, Brosstad FR, Barstad RM, Sakariassen KS (1997) Shear-induced platelet activation and platelet microparticle formation at blood flow conditions as in arteries with a severe stenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17(4):646–653

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Flohr TG, Stierstorfer K, Ulzheimer S, Bruder H, Primak AN, McCollough CH (2005) Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot. Med Phys 32(8):2536–2547

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, Petersilka M, Gruber K, Suss C, Grasruck M, Stierstorfer K, Krauss B, Raupach R, Primak AN, Kuttner A, Achenbach S, Becker C, Kopp A, Ohnesorge BM (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16(2):256–268

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by the National Center of Competence in Research for Computer Aided and Image Guided Medical Interventions (NCCR CO-ME) of the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Radiology, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland

    Thomas Frauenfelder, Thomas Schertler, Lars Husmann, Sebastian Leschka, Borut Marincek & Hatem Alkadhi

  2. Laboratory of Thermodynamics in Emerging Technologies, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Evangelos Boutsianis & Dimos Poulikakos

Authors
  1. Thomas Frauenfelder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Evangelos Boutsianis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas Schertler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lars Husmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sebastian Leschka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dimos Poulikakos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Borut Marincek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hatem Alkadhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Frauenfelder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frauenfelder, T., Boutsianis, E., Schertler, T. et al. In-vivo flow simulation in coronary arteries based on computed tomography datasets: feasibility and initial results. Eur Radiol 17, 1291–1300 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0465-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0465-1

Keywords

  • Computational flow simulation
  • Coronary arteries
  • Hemodynamics