Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of steady state free precession imaging of the pancreas

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this work was to assess the diagnostic value of fast steady state free precession (SSFP) for the detection, characterization, and delineation of pancreatic lesions. Forty-eight patients referred for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the pancreas were included in the study. In addition to the standard protocol, axial pre-contrast SSFP slices of the pancreas were acquired. The standard of reference was defined as based on all imaging data other than SSFP, histopathology, surgery, and/or clinical follow-up. A randomized consensus reading of the SSFP data sets was retrospectively conducted by two board-certified radiologists. The presence of pancreatic lesions, local infiltration, and lymph node metastases was evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. The overall sensitivity and specificity of SSFP were 0.93 and 0.77, respectively. Comparable values were achieved for lymph node detection (0.88/0.91) and assessment of vascular infiltration (0.94/0.91). The mean area under the ROC curve (Az) was 0.91. Owing to its potential to detect vascular infiltration and the rapid acquisition time, SSFP imaging should be supplemented as part of a standard MR protocol of the pancreas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Semelka RC, Kelekis NL, Molina PL, Sharp TJ, Calvo B (1996) Pancreatic masses with inconclusive findings on spiral CT: is there a role for MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging 6:585–588

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, Panebianco V, Fabiano S, Passariello R (1999) MRI of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. Eur Radiol 9:1513–1522

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson PA (2002) The role of MRI in pancreatic cancer. Eur Radiol 12:267–269

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Mueller PR, Saini S (2003) State-of-the-art imaging of pancreatic neoplasms. Br J Radiol 76:857–865

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hammond N, Miller FH, Sica GT, Gore RM (2002) Imaging of cystic diseases of the pancreas. Radiol Clin North Am 40:1243–1262

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gabata T, Matsui O, Kadoya M et al (1994) Small pancreatic adenocarcinomas: efficacy of MR imaging with fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement. Radiology 193:683–688

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gohde SC, Toth J, Krestin GP, Debatin JF (1997) Dynamic contrast-enhanced FMPSPGR of the pancreas: impact on diagnostic performance. Am J Roentgenol 168:689–696

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mitchell DG, Outwater EK, Vinitski S (1994) Hybrid RARE: implementations for abdominal MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 4:109–117

    Google Scholar 

  9. Outwater EK, Mitchell DG, Vinitski S (1994) Abdominal MR imaging: evaluation of a fast spin-echo sequence. Radiology 190:425–429

    Google Scholar 

  10. Semelka RC, Kelekis NL, Thomasson D, Brown MA, Laub GA (1996) HASTE MR imaging: description of technique and preliminary results in the abdomen. J Magn Reson Imaging 6:698–699

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fuchs F, Laub G, Othomo K (2003) TrueFISP—technical considerations and cardiovascular applications. Eur J Radiol 46:28–32

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scheffler K, Lehnhardt S (2003) Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques. Eur Radiol 13:2409–2418

    Google Scholar 

  13. Semelka RC, Balci NC, Op de Beeck B, Reinhold C (1999) Evaluation of a 10-minute comprehensive MR imaging examination of the upper abdomen. Radiology 211:189–195

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Horstmann O et al (2002) Preoperative local MRI-staging of patients with a suspected pancreatic mass. Eur Radiol 12:296–303

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P (1999) SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:952–962

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jeong YY, Mitchell DG, Holland GA (2001) Liver lesion conspicuity: T2-weighted breath-hold fast spin-echo MR imaging before and after gadolinium enhancement—initial experience. Radiology 219:455–460

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jung B, Krombach GA, Gunther RW, Buecker A (2004) Is postcontrast trueFISP imaging advantageous? Invest Radiol 39:517–523

    Google Scholar 

  18. Piironen A, Kivisaari R, Laippala P, Poutanen VP, Kivisaari L (2001) Pancreatic carcinoma and fast MR imaging: technical considerations for signal intensity difference measurements. Eur J Radiol 38:137–145

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph U. Herborn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herborn, C.U., Vogt, F.M., Lauenstein, T.C. et al. Evaluation of steady state free precession imaging of the pancreas. Eur Radiol 15, 1629–1633 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2774-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2774-1

Keywords

Navigation