Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prospective, multireader evaluation of image quality and vascular delineation of multislice CT angiography of the brain

  • Neuro
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this prospective, multireader trial was to investigate image quality and vascular delineation of cranial multislice CT angiography (MSCTA) to identify strengths and weaknesses of the method. Sixty consecutive patients underwent standardized cranial MSCTA. The mean estimated effective dose was 0.96±0.11 mSv. Three masked readers independently graded image quality parameters and vascular delineation on a 5-point scale. Vascular attenuation values and dose-length products were assessed quantitatively. Quantitative parameters were evaluated with a proportional odds regression model with bootstrapped standard errors to adjust the relevant standard errors for correlation within subjects and across readers. The non-parametric Wilcoxon sign-rank test was applied for quantitative measurements. Good to excellent ratings were observed regarding image quality parameters and vascular delineation. The delineation of veins was rated higher than that of arteries (OR 2.00). Smaller arterial segments were rated significantly less favorably than larger segments (OR up to 26.98). Moreover, the cavernous sinus, the C2 segment of the ICA and the communicating arteries demonstrated lower scores. Attenuation values were >240 HU and vessel-to-parenchyma ratios >7 in all vessels. Cranial MSCTA achieved high ratings regarding image quality and vascular delineation. Relative weaknesses were found in small arterial subsegments and in vessels in close topographical proximity to bone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Schmidt AJ et al. (1999) Computed tomographic angiography: historical perspective and new state-of-the-art using multi detector-row helical computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23(Suppl 1):S83–S90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P (1990) Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology 176:181–183

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Klingenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T, Ohnesorge B, Kopp AF, Baum U (1999) Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol 31:110–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Polacin A, Kalender WA, Marchal G (1992) Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology 185:29–35

    Google Scholar 

  5. White PM, Wardlaw JM, Easton V (2000) Can noninvasive imaging accurately depict intracranial aneurysms? A systematic review. Radiology 217:361–370

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kato Y, Nair S, Sano H et al. (2002) Multi-slice 3D-CTA—an improvement over single slice helical CTA for cerebral aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:715–722

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tomandl BF, Klotz E, Handschu R et al. (2003) Comprehensive imaging of ischemic stroke with multisection CT. Radiographics 23:565–592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Klingebiel R, Zimmer C, Rogalla P et al. (2001) Assessment of the arteriovenous cerebrovascular system by multi-slice CT. A single-bolus, monophasic protocol. Acta Radiol 42:560–562

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klingebiel R, Busch M, Bohner G, Zimmer C, Hoffmann O, Masuhr F (2002) Multi-slice CT angiography in the evaluation of patients with acute cerebrovascular disease—a promising new diagnostic tool. J Neurol 249:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones TR, Kaplan RT, Lane B, Atlas SW, Rubin GD (2001) Single- versus multi-detector row CT of the brain: quality assessment. Radiology 219:750–755

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Mastora I et al. (2001) Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far in the lung does multi-detector row spiral CT allow analysis? Radiology 219:629–636

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kudo K, Terae S, Asano T et al. (2003) Anterior spinal artery and artery of Adamkiewicz detected by using multi-detector row CT. Am J Neuroradiol 24:13–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hidajat N, Maurer J, Schroder RJ et al. (1999) Relationships between physical dose quantities and patient dose in CT. Br J Radiol 72:556–561

    Google Scholar 

  14. Efron B, Halloran E, Holmes S (1996) Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:13429–13434

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carmelo A, Ficola A, Fravolini ML, La Cava M, Maira G, Mangiola A (2002) ICP and CBF regulation: a new hypothesis to explain the “windkessel” phenomenon. Acta Neurochir Suppl 81:112–116

    Google Scholar 

  16. Acuff CG, Hoskins G, Moore NA, Rockhold RW (1996) Acute cerebral artery constriction in the spontaneously hypertensive rat following blood and plasma administration into the subarachnoid space. J Biomed Sci 3:117–125

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fukuhara T, Duoville CM, Eliott JP, Newell DW, Winn HR (1998) Relationship between intracranial pressure and the development of vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurol Med Chir 38:710–715

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ertl-Wagner BB, Hoffmann RT, Bruening R, Herrmann K, Dichgans M, Reiser MF (2004) Blurring of the vessels of the interhemispheric fissure in multislice CT angiography: a sign of meningeal carcinomatosis. Eur Radiol 14:673–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Lugt A, Buter TC, Govaere F, Siepman DA, Tanghe HL, Dippel DW (2004) Accuracy of CT angiography in the assessment of a fetal origin of the posterior cerebral artery. Eur Radiol 14:1627–1633

    Google Scholar 

  20. van Straten M, Venema HW, Streekstra GJ, Majoie CB, den Heeten GJ, Grimbergen CA (2004) Removal of bone in CT angiography of the cervical arteries by piecewise matched mask bone elimination. Med Phys 31:2924–2933

    Google Scholar 

  21. Venema HW, den Heeten GJ (2003) Subtraction helical CT angiography of intra- and extracranial vessels: technical considerations and preliminary experience-rediscovery of matched mask bone elimination? Am J Neuroradiol 24:1491 (author reply 1491–1492)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Venema HW, Hulsmans FJ, den Heeten GJ (2001) CT angiography of the circle of Willis and intracranial internal carotid arteries: maximum intensity projection with matched mask bone elimination-feasibility study. Radiology 218:893–898

    Google Scholar 

  23. Luboldt W, Weber R, Seemann M, Desantis M, Reiser M (1999) Influence of helical CT parameters on spatial resolution in CT angiography performed with a subsecond scanner. Invest Radiol 34:421–426

    Google Scholar 

  24. Polacin A, Kalender WA, Brink J, Vannier MA (1994) Measurement of slice sensitivity profiles in spiral CT. Med Phys 21:133–140

    Google Scholar 

  25. Imanishi Y, Fukui A, Niimi H et al. Radiation-induced temporary hair loss as a radiation damage only occurring in patients who had the combination of MDCT and DSA. Eur Radiol DOI 10.1007/s00330-004-2459-1

  26. Huda W, Chamberlain CC, Rosenbaum AE, Garrisi W (2001) Radiation doses to infants and adults undergoing head CT examinations. Med Phys 28:393–399

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hamberg L, Rhea JT, Hunter GJ, Thrall JH (2003) Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics. Radiology 226:762–772

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ertl-Wagner BB, Hoffmann RT, Bruning R et al. (2004) Multi-detector row CT angiography of the brain at various kilovoltage settings. Radiology 231:528–535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sohaib SA, Peppercorn PD, Horrocks JA, Keene MH, Kenyon GS, Reznek RH (2001) The effect of decreasing mAs on image quality and patient dose in sinus CT. Br J Radiol 74:157–161

    Google Scholar 

  30. Prasad SRWC, Shepard JA, McLoud T, Rhea J (2002) Standard-dose and 50%-reduced dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality. Am J Roentgenol 179:461–465

    Google Scholar 

  31. Garg K, Keith RL, Byers T, Kelly K, Kerzner AL, Lynch DA, Miller YE (2002) Randomized controlled trial with low-dose spiral CT for lung cancer screening: feasibility study and first results. Radiology 225:506–510

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Clinical Radiology, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany

    Birgit B. Ertl-Wagner, Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann, Karin A. Herrmann & Maximilian F. Reiser

  2. Institute of Neuroradiology, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, Munich, Germany

    Roland Bruening

  3. Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

    Jeffrey Blume & Brad Snyder

Authors
  1. Birgit B. Ertl-Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roland Bruening
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeffrey Blume
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Brad Snyder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Karin A. Herrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Maximilian F. Reiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birgit B. Ertl-Wagner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ertl-Wagner, B.B., Bruening, R., Blume, J. et al. Prospective, multireader evaluation of image quality and vascular delineation of multislice CT angiography of the brain. Eur Radiol 15, 1051–1059 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2689-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2689-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation