Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effectiveness of intra-arterial anesthesia for uterine fibroid embolization using dilute lidocaine

  • Urogenital
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A modified protocol of uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) is proposed for alleviating the postinterventional pain. This randomized and double-blinded clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of intra-arterial infusion of dilute lidocaine for postinterventional pain relief in UFE. Forty-six patients who underwent UFE were randomly grouped equally. In the test group, after the poly(vinyl alcohol) embolization was complete, a dilute lidocaine solution with 40 mg in 6.0 ml, 3.0 ml for each side or 4.0 and 2.0 ml for two sides, was given through the catheter. In the control group, the patients received 6.0 ml of saline solution as a placebo. A simple pain degree classification method for patient self-evaluation was developed. A questionnaire was completed by each patient to record the degree of pain during five periods; these were during the procedure, the first 12 h, the second 12 h, between 24 and 48 h, and between 48 and 72 h. The numbers of patients with the same degree of pain in the five time segments from the two groups were statistically compared. Compared with the control group, the patients in the test group experienced less pain within 48 h after the procedure (p<0.01). The results suggest that this improved UFE protocol is a simple approach to prevent the acute postinterventional pain of UFE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McLucas B, Adler L, Perrella R (2001) Uterine fibroid embolization: nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic fibroids. J Am Coll Surg 192:95–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Klein A, Schwartz ML (2001) Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine fibroid: an outpatient procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1556–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lipman JC, Smith SJ, Spies JB et al (2002) Uterine fibroid embolization: follow-up. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 5:44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pron G, Mocarski E, Bennett J et al (2003) Tolerance, hospital stay, and recovery after uterine artery embolization for fibroids: the Ontario Uterine Fibroid Embolization Trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14: 1243–1250

    Google Scholar 

  5. Siskin GP, Bonn J, Worthington-Kirsch RL et al (2002) Uterine fibroid embolization: pain management. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 5:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keyoung JA, Levy EB, Roth AR et al (2001) Intraarterial lidocaine for pain control after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:1065–1073

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pron G, Mocarski E, Bennett J et al (2003) Tolerance, hospital stay, and recovery after uterine artery embolization for fibroids: the Ontario Uterine Fibroid Embolization Trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:1243–1250

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee SH, Hahn ST, Park SH (2001) Intraarterial lidocaine administration for relief of pain resulting from transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: its effectiveness and optimal timing of administration. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24:368–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hartnell G, Gates J, Stuart K et al (1999) Effect of intra-arterial lidocaine on pain and post-procedure recovery. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 22:293–297

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guthaner DF, Silverman JF, Hayden WG et al (1977) Intra-arterial analgesia in peripheral arteriography. Am J Roentgenol 128:737–739

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huskisson E (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet 2:1127–1131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ravina JH, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-Vigneron N et al (1995) Arterial embolization to treat uterine myomata. Lancet 346:671–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pelage JP, Le Dref O, Soyer P et al (2000) Fibroid-related menorrhagia: treatment with superselective embolization of the uterine arteries and midterm follow-up. Radiology 215:428–435

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sterling KM, Vogelzang RL, Chrisman HB et al (2002) Uterine fibroid embolization: management of complications. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 5:56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Siskin GP, Meo PA (1999) Patient care issues surrounding the uterine artery embolization procedure for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Images 18:4–8

    Google Scholar 

  16. Foldes F Molloy R, Mcnall P et al (1960) Comparison of toxicity of intravenously given local anesthetic agents in man. JAMA 172:1493–1498

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jorfeldt L, Lofstrom B, Pernow B et al (1968) The effect of local anesthetics on the central circulation and respiration in man and dog. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 12: 153–169

    Google Scholar 

  18. Siskin GP, Englander M, Stainken BF et al (2000) Embolic agents used for uterine fibroid embolization. Am J Roentgenol 175:767–775

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Robert I. White from Yale University, CA, USA, for research design and article preparation. He made a significant contribution during the clinical trial by a trip to our institute for on-site instruction and consultation of UFE techniques.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Songhua Zhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhan, S., Li, Y., Wang, G. et al. Effectiveness of intra-arterial anesthesia for uterine fibroid embolization using dilute lidocaine. Eur Radiol 15, 1752–1756 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2686-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2686-0

Keywords

Navigation