Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multidetector computed tomography enteroclysis (MDCT-E) with neutral enteral and IV contrast enhancement in tumor detection

  • Gastrointestinal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of our study was to evaluate the reliability of MDCT-enteroclysis (MDCT-E), an emerging technique of small bowel examination that combines the advantages of MDCT examination of the abdomen and the enteral volume challenge of enteroclysis, in evaluation of small bowel neoplasms. In our institutions, MDCT-E was used to study 456 patients (age range 21–84 years, mean 53 years) admitted for suspicion of small bowel disease. All examinations were done on multichannel CT units, 129 on a 16-slice scanner and 327 on a four-slice scanner. Post-processing and multiplanar reformatting and interpretation were performed on dedicated workstations. After adequate gastrointestinal preparation and naso-enteric intubation, small bowel was distended by methylcellulose infused by a peristaltic pump. One volumetric MDCT acquisition was obtained after 120–130 ml of intravenous contrast medium. Multiplanar reformatting was based on the image reconstruction parameters from 3 to 4 mm. Forty-five small bowel neoplasms were found; in the remaining cases, 223 Crohn’s diseases and 149 other abnormalities were detected. All findings were confirmed by surgery, endoscopy or clinical follow-up. In our experience, MDCT-E with neutral enteral and IV contrast seems to be a reliable method in the diagnosis of small bowel neoplasms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gourtsoyannis N, Makò E (1997) Imaging of primary small intestinal tumors by enteroclysis and CT with pathological correlations. Eur Radiol 7:625–642

    Google Scholar 

  2. Good CA (1963) Tumors of the small intestine. Am J Roentgenol 89:685–705

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maglinte DDT, Herlinger H (1999) Small bowel neoplasms In: Herlinger H, Maglinte DDT, Birnbaum BA (eds) Clinical imaging of the small intestine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 377–438

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maglinte DDT, O’Connor K, Bessette J, Chernish SM, Kelvin FM (1991) The role of the physician in the late diagnosis of primary malignant tumors of the small intestine. Am J Gastroenterol 86:304–308

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zollinger RM Jr (1986) Primary neoplasms of the small intestine. Am J Surg 151:654–658

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yang YS, Huang QY, Wang WF, Sun G, Peng LH (2003) Primary jejunoileal neoplasmas: a review of 60 cases. World J Gastroenterol 9(4):862–864

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bessette JR, Maglinte DDT, Kelvin FM, Gernish SM (1989) Primary malignant tumors in the small bowel: a comparison of the small bowel enema and conventional follow-through examination. Am J Roentgenol 153:741–744

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gourtsoyannis N, Bays D, Malamas M, Barouxis G, Liasis N (1992) Radiological appearances of small intestinal leiomyomas. Clin Radiol 45:94–103

    Google Scholar 

  9. Horton KM, Fishman EK (2004) Multidetector-row computed tomography and 3-dimensional computed tomography imaging of small bowel neoplasms: current concept in diagnosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28(1):106–116

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horton KM, Fishman EK (2003). The current status of multidetector row CT and three-dimensional imaging of the small bowel. Radiol Clin N Am 41(2):199–212

    Google Scholar 

  11. Orjollet-Lecoanet C, Ménard Y, Martins A, Crombé- Ternamian A, Cotton F, Valette PJ (2000) L’entéroscanner: une nouvelle méthode d’exploration du grele. J Radiol 81:618–627

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Voderholzer WA, Ortner N, Rogalla P, Beinholzl J, Lochs H (2003) Diagnostic yield of wireless capsule enteroscopy in comparison with computed tomography enteroclysis. Endoscopy 35(12):1009–1014

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bender GN, Maglinte DDT, Von Kloppel R, Timmons JH (1999) CT enteroclysis: a superfluous diagnostic procedure or valuable when investigating small-bowel disease? Am J Roentgenol 172:373–378

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Grassi R, Di Mizio R, Romano S, Cappabianca S, Del Vecchio W, Severini S (2000) Multiple jejeunal angiodysplasia detected by enema-helical CT. Clin Imag 24(2):61–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rollandi GA, Curone PF, Biscaldi E, Nardi F, Bonifacino E, Conzi R, Derchi LE (1999) Spiral CT of the abdomen after distention of small bowel loops with transparent enema in patients with Crohn’s disease. Abdom Imaging 24(6):544–549

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rollandi GA, Biscaldi E (2000) CT enteroclysis. In: Terrier F, Grosholtz, Becker CD (eds) Spiral CT of the abdomen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 369–383

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maglinte DDT, Bender GN, Heitcamp DE, Lappas JK, Kelvin FM (2003) Multidetector-row helical CT enteroclysis. Radiol Clin N Am 41(2):249–262

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bruel JM, Gallix B (2003) Multidetector CT and MR in diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. J Radiol 84:499–513

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmidt S, Lepori D, Mewly JY, Duvoisin B, Meuli R, Michetti P et al (2003) Prospective comparison of MR enteroclysis with multidetector spiral-CT enteroclysis: interobserver agreement and sensitivity by means of “sign-by-sign” correlation. Eur Radiol 13:1303–1311

    Google Scholar 

  20. Boudiaf M, Jaff A, Soyer P, Bouhnik Y, Hamzi L, Rymer R (2004) Small bowel disease: prospective evaluation of multi-detector row helical CT enteroclysis in 107 consecutive patients. Radiology 233:338–344

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fleishmann D (2003) Future prospects in MDCT imaging. Eur Radiol 13:M127–M128

    Google Scholar 

  22. Verdun FR, Noel A, Meuli R, Pachoud M, Monnin P, Valley JF et al (2004) Influence of detector collimation on SNR in four different MDCT scanners using a reconstructed slice thickness of 5 mm. Eur Radiol 14:1866–1872

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefania Romano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romano, S., De Lutio, E., Rollandi, G.A. et al. Multidetector computed tomography enteroclysis (MDCT-E) with neutral enteral and IV contrast enhancement in tumor detection. Eur Radiol 15, 1178–1183 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2673-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2673-5

Keywords

Navigation