Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

CT imaging in acute pulmonary embolism: diagnostic strategies

  • Chest
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTA) has increasingly become accepted as a widely available, safe, cost-effective, and accurate method for a quick and comprehensive diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Pulmonary catheter angiography is still considered the gold standard and final imaging method in many diagnostic algorithms. However, spiral CTA has become established as the first imaging test in clinical routine due to its high negative predictive value for clinically relevant PE. Despite the direct visualization of clot material, depiction of cardiac and pulmonary function in combination with the quantification of pulmonary obstruction helps to grade the severity of PE for further risk stratification and to monitor the effect of thrombolytic therapy. Because PE and deep venous thrombosis are two different aspects of the same disease, additional indirect CT venography may be a valuable addition to the initial diagnostic algorithm—if this was positive for PE—and demonstration of the extent and localization of deep venous thrombosis has an impact on clinical management. Additional and alternate diagnoses add to the usefulness of this method. Using advanced multislice spiral CT technology, some practitioners have advocated CTA as the sole imaging tool for routine clinical assessment in suspected acute PE. This will simplify standards of practice in the near future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Dalen JE, Alpert JS (1975) Natural history of pulmonary embolism. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 17:259–270

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lilienfeld DE, Chan E, Ehland J, Godbold JH, Landrigan PJ, Marsh G (1990) Mortality from pulmonary embolism in the United States. Chest 98:1067–1072

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldhaber SZ, Elliott CG (2003) Acute pulmonary embolism, Part 1: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis. Circulation 108:2726–2729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coche E, Verschuren F, Hainaut P, Goncette L (2004) Pulmonary embolism findings on chest radiography and multislice spiral CT. Eur Radiol 14:1241–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenspan RH, Ravin CE, Polansky SM, McLoud TC (1982) Accuracy of chest radiograph in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Invest Radiol 17:539–543

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fishman EK, Horton KM (2000) CT of suspected pulmonary embolism: study design optimization. Am J Roentgenol 175:1002–1003

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sostman HD, Ravin CE, Sullivan DC (1982) Use of pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism: influence of scintigraphic diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol 139:673–677

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harvey RT, Gefter WB, Hrung JM, Langlotz CP (2000) Accuracy of CT angiography versus pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of the literature with summary ROC curve analysis. Acad Radiol 7:786–797

    Google Scholar 

  9. Banks BF (1998) Diagnosis and treatment of acute pulmonary thromboembolic disease. Appl Radiol 27: S27–S33

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldhaber SZ (1998) Pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 339:93–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kauczor HU, Heussel CP, Thelen M (1999) Update in diagnostic strategies of pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol 9:262–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garg K, Welsh CH, Feyerabend AJ, Subber SW, Russ PD, Johnston RJ, Durham JD, Lynch DA (1998) Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT and ventilation–perfusion scanning—correlation with pulmonary angiographic results or clinical outcome. Radiology 208:201–208

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith TP (2000) Pulmonary embolism: what’s wrong with this diagnosis? Am J Roentgenol 174:1489–1497

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parker J, Coleman R, Siegel B, Sostman H, McKusick K, Royal H (1996) Procedure guideline for lung scintigraphy: 1.0 Society of Nuclear Medicine. J Nucl Med 37:1906–1910

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. PIOPED Investigators (1990) Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis. J Am Med Assoc 263:2753–2759

    Google Scholar 

  16. Drucker EA, Rivitz SM, Shepard JAO, Boiselle PM, Trotman-Dickenson B, Welch TJ, Maus TP, Miller SW, Kaufman JA, Waltman AC, McLoud TC, Athanasoulis CA (1998) Acute pulmonary embolism: assessment of helical CT for diagnosis. Radiology 209:235–241

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodman LR, Curtin JJ, Mewissen MW, Foley WD, Lipchik RJ, Crain MR, Sagar KB, Collier BD (1995) Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography. Am J Roentgenol 164:1369–1374

    Google Scholar 

  18. VanRossum AB, Pattynama PMT, Ton ER, Treurniet FE, Arndt JW, VanEck B, Kieft GJ (1996) Pulmonary embolism: validation of spiral CT angiography in 149 patients. Radiology 201:467–470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rathbun SW, Raskob GE, Whitsett TL (2000) Sensitivity and specificity of helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 132:227–232

    Google Scholar 

  20. VanBeek EJ, Brouwers EM, Song B, Bongaerts AH, Oudkerk M (2001) Lung scintigraphy and helical computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 7:87–92

    Google Scholar 

  21. Remy-Jardin M, Baghaie F, Bonnel F, Masson P, Duhamel A, Remy J (2000) Thoracic helical CT: influence of subsecond scan time and thin collimation on evaluation of peripheral pulmonary arteries. Eur Radiol 10:1297–1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F, Artaud D, Beregi JP, Hossein-Foucher C, Marchandise X, Duhamel A (1996) Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Radiology 200:699–706

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D, Deschildre F, Duhamel A (1997) Peripheral pulmonary arteries: optimization of the spiral CT acquisition protocol. Radiology 204:157–163

    Google Scholar 

  24. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D, Fribourg M, Beregi JP (1998) Spiral CT of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic approach, interpretive pitfalls and current indications. Eur Radiol 8:1376–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruiz Y, Caballero P, Caniego JL, Friera A, Olivera MJ, Tagarro D, Alvarez-Sala R (2003) Prospective comparison of helical CT with angiography in pulmonary embolism: global and selective vascular territory analysis—interobserver agreement. Eur Radiol 13:823–829

    Google Scholar 

  26. Diederich S (2003) Radiation dose in helical CT for detection of pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol 13:1491–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Resten A, Mausoleo F, Valero M, Musset D (2003) Comparison of doses for pulmonary embolism detection with helical CT and pulmonary angiography. Eur Radiol 13:1515–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, Valli N, Couffinhal T, Raherisson C, Leccia F, Laurent F (2000) Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation–perfusion radionuclide scanning. Am J Roentgenol 174:1041–1047

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cross JJL, Kemp PM, Walsh CG, Flower CDR, Dixon AK (1998) A randomized trial of spiral CT and ventilation perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Clin Radiol 53:177–182

    Google Scholar 

  30. Goodman LR (1998) Helical CT for initial imaging of pulmonary embolus. Am J Roentgenol 171:1153–1154

    Google Scholar 

  31. Anderson DR, Wells PS (1999) Improvements in the diagnostic approach for patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 82:878–886

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tapson VF, Carroll BA, Davidson BL, Elliott CG, Fedullo PF, Hales CA, Hull RD, Hyers TM, Leeper KV Jr, Morris TA, Moser KM, Raskob GE, Shure D, Sostman HD, Taylor Thompson B (1999) The diagnostic approach to acute venous thromboembolism: clinical practice guideline. American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160:1043–1066

    Google Scholar 

  33. Task Force on Pulmonary Embolism, European Society of Cardiology (2000) Task force report: guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 21:1301–1336

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fedullo PF, Tapson VF (2003) The evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 349:1247–1256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schoepf UJ, Goldhaber SZ, Costello P (2004) Spiral computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 109:2160–2167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Van Strijen MJL, De Monyé W, Kieft GJ, Pattynama PMT, Huisman MV, Smith SJ, Bloem JL (2003) Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT as a second procedure following scintigraphy. Eur Radiol 13:1501–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ginsberg MS, Oh J, Welber A, Panicek DM (2002) Clinical usefulness of imaging performed after CT angiography that was negative for pulmonary embolus in a high-risk oncologic population. Am J Roentgenol 179:1205–1208

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schibany N, Fleischmann D, Thallinger C, Schibany A, Hahne J, Ba-Ssalamah A, Herold CJ (2001) Equipment availability and diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism in Austria. Eur Radiol 11:2287–2294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Qanadli SD, El Hajjam M, Mesurolle B, Barré O, Bruckert F, Joseph T, Mignon F, Vieillard-Baron A, Dubourg O, Lacombe P (2000) Pulmonary embolism detection: prospective evaluation of dual-section helical CT versus selective pulmonary arteriography in 157 patients. Radiology 217:447–455

    Google Scholar 

  40. Müller C, Kopka L, Funke M, Funke C, Grabbe E (2001) Diagnosis of lung embolism and underlying venous thrombosis in multi-slice spiral CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 173:528–535

    Google Scholar 

  41. Raptopoulos V, Boiselle PM (2001) Multi-detector row spiral CT pulmonary angiography: comparison with single-detector row spiral CT. Radiology 221:606–613

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Mastora I, Delannoy V, Duhamel A, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M (2001) Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far in the lung does multi-detector row spiral CT allow analysis? Radiology 219:629–636

    Google Scholar 

  43. Schoepf UJ, Holzknecht N, Helmberger TK, Crispin A, Hong C, Becker CR, Reiser MF (2002) Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT. Radiology 222:483–490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Patel S, Kazerooni EA, Cascade PN (2003) Pulmonary embolism: optimization of small pulmonary arteries visualization at multidetector row CT. Radiology 227:455–460

    Google Scholar 

  45. Remy-Jardin M, Tillie-Leblond I, Szapiro D, Ghaye B, Cotte L, Mastora I, Delannoy V, Remy J (2002) CT angiography of pulmonary embolism in patients with underlying respiratory disease: impact of multislice CT on image quality and negative predictive value. Eur Radiol 12:1971–1978

    Google Scholar 

  46. Coche E, Pawlak S, Dechambre S, Maldague B (2003) Peripheral pulmonary arteries: identification at multi-slice spiral CT with 3D reconstruction. Eur Radiol 13:815–822

    Google Scholar 

  47. Klingenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T, Ohnesorge B, Kopp AF, Baum U (1999) Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol 31:110–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Reinartz P, Wildberger JE, Schaefer W, Nowak B, Mahnken AH, Buell U (2004) Tomographic imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: comparison between V/Q lung scintigraphy in SPECT technique and multi-slice spiral CT. J Nucl Med 45:1501–1508

    Google Scholar 

  49. British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee Pulmonary Embolism Guideline Development Group (2003) British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax 58:470–483

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wildberger JE, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM, Stargardt A, Haage P, Schaller S, Günther RW (2002) A differentiated approach to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis using multi-slice CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 174:301–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kuiper JW, Geleijns J, Matheijssen NAA, Teeuwisse W, Pattynama PMT (2003) Radiation exposure of multi-row spiral computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries: comparison with digital subtraction pulmonary angiography. Eur Radiol 13:1496–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Schuster A, Frank R, Pallwein L, Gotwald T, Daniaux M, ZurNedden D (2001) Retrospectively ECG-gated multislice CT angiography for the detection of pulmonary embolism: comparison to non-ECG-gated spiral CT imaging. Radiology 221:P256

    Google Scholar 

  53. Marten K, Engelke C, Funke M, Obenauer S, Baum F, Grabbe E (2003) ECG-gated multislice spiral CT for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Clin Radiol 58:862–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ghaye B, Dondelinger RF (2002) Non-traumatic thoracic emergencies: CT venography in an integrated diagnostic strategy of acute pulmonary embolism and venous thrombosis. Eur Radiol 12:1906–1921

    Google Scholar 

  55. Begemann PG, Bonacker M, Kemper J, Guthoff AE, Hahn KE, Steiner P, Adam G (2003) Evaluation of the deep venous system in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism with multi-detector CT: a prospective study in comparison to Doppler sonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27:399–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Stein PD, Henry JW (1997) Prevalence of acute pulmonary embolism in central and subsegmental pulmonary arteries and relation to probability interpretation of ventilation/perfusion lung scans. Chest 111:1246–1248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. DeMonyé W, VanStrijen MJL, Huisman MV, Kieft GJ, Pattynama PMT, Advances in New Technologies Evaluating the Localisation of Pulmonary Embolism (ANTELOPE) Group (2000) Suspected pulmonary embolism: prevalence and anatomic distribution in 487 consecutive patients. Radiology 215:184–188

    Google Scholar 

  58. Oser RF, Zuckerman DA, Gutierrez FR, Brink JA (1996) Anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli at pulmonary angiography: implications for cross-sectional imaging. Radiology 199:31–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Swensen SJ, Sheedy PF 2nd, Ryu JH, Pickett DD, Schleck CD, Ilstrup DM, Heit JA (2002) Outcomes after withholding anticoagulation from patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative computed tomographic findings: a cohort study. Mayo Clin Proc 77:130–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lomis NN, Yoon HC, Moran AG, Miller FJ (1999) Clinical outcomes of patients after a negative spiral CT pulmonary angiogram in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:707–712

    Google Scholar 

  61. Garg K, Sieler H, Welsh CH, Johnston RJ, Russ PD (1999) Clinical validity of helical CT being interpreted as negative for pulmonary embolism: implications for patient treatment. Am J Roentgenol 172:1627–1631

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ, Kuzo RS, Liu Y, McAuliffe TL, O’Brien DJ (2000) Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram—prospective comparison with scintigraphy. Radiology 215:535–542

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Gottsäter A, Berg A, Centergard J, Frennby B, Nirhov N, Nyman U (2001) Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: is it safe to withhold anticoagulation after a negative spiral CT? Eur Radiol 11:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ost D, Rozenshtein A, Saffran L, Snider A (2001) The negative predictive value of spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with nondiagnostic ventilation–perfusion scans. Am J Med 110:16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Tillie-Leblond I, Mastora I, Radenne F, Paillard S, Tonnel AB, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M (2002) Risk of pulmonary embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in patients with pulmonary disease: 1-year clinical follow-up study. Radiology 223:461–467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Nilsson T, Olausson A, Johnsson H, Nyman U, Aspelin P (2002) Negative spiral CT in acute pulmonary embolism. Acta Radiol 43:486–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, Maitre S, Girard P, Leroyer C, Revel MP, Carette MF, Laurent M, Charbonnier B, Laurent F, Mal H, Nonent M, Lancar R, Grenier P, Simonneau G, Evaluation du Scanner Spirale dans l’Embolie Pulmonaire study group (2002) Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet 360:1914–1920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. VanStrijen MJ, DeMonye W, Schiereck J, Kieft GJ, Prins MH, Huisman MV, Pattynama PM, Advances in New Technologies Evaluating the Localisation of Pulmonary Embolism Study Group (2003) Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter clinical management study in 510 patients. Ann Intern Med 138:307–314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Donato AA, Scheirer JJ, Atwell MS, Gramp J, Duszak R Jr (2003) Clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative helical computed tomographic results in whom anticoagulation is withheld. Arch Intern Med 163:2033–2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Friera A, Olivera MJ, Suarez C, Gimenez N, Caballero P, Thromboembolic Study Group of La Princessa Hospital (2004) Clinical validity of negative helical computed tomography for clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism. Respiration 71:30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Kavanagh EC, O’Hare A, Hargaden G, Murray JG (2004) Risk of pulmonary embolism after negative MDCT pulmonary angiography findings. Am J Roentgenol 182:499–504

    Google Scholar 

  72. Carson JL, Kelley MA, Duff A, Weg JG, Fulkerson WJ, Palevsky HI, Schwartz JS, Thompson BT, Popovich J Jr, Hobbins TE et al (1992) The clinical course of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 326:1240–1245

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Bankier AA, Janata K, Fleischmann D, Kreuzer S, Mallek R, Frossard M, Domanovits H, Herold CJ (1997) Severity assessment of acute pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: evaluation of two modified angiographic scores and comparison with clinical data. J Thorac Imaging 12:150–158

    Google Scholar 

  74. Qanadli SD, El Hajjam M, Vieillard-Baron A, Joseph T, Mesurolle B, Oliva VL, Barre O, Bruckert F, Dubourg O, Lacombe P (2001) New CT index to quantify arterial obstruction in pulmonary embolism: comparison with angiographic index and echocardiography. Am J Roentgenol 176:1415–1420

    Google Scholar 

  75. Mastora I, Remy-Jardin M, Masson P, Galland E, Delannoy V, Bauchart JJ, Remy J (2003) Severity of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of a new spiral CT angiographic score in correlation with echocardiographic data. Eur Radiol 13:29–35

    Google Scholar 

  76. Wu AS, Pezzulo JA, Cronan JJ, Hou DD, Mayo-Smith WW (2004) CT pulmonary angiography: quantification of pulmonary embolus as a predictor of patient outcome—initial experience. Radiology 230:831–835

    Google Scholar 

  77. Collomb D, Paramelle PJ, Calaque O, Bosson JL, Vanzetto G, Barnoud D, Pison C, Coulomb M, Ferretti G (2003) Severity assessment of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation using helical CT. Eur Radiol 13:1508–1514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Miller GA, Sutton GC, Kerr IH, Gibson RV, Honey M (1971) Comparison of streptokinase and heparin in treatment of isolated acute massive pulmonary embolism. Br Med J 19:681–684

    Google Scholar 

  79. Kuriyama K, Gamsu G, Stern RG, Cann CE, Herfkens RJ, Brundage BH (1984) CT-determined pulmonary artery diameters in predicting pulmonary hypertension. Invest Radiol 19:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  80. Come PC (1992) Echocardiographic evaluation of pulmonary embolism and its response to therapeutic interventions. Chest 101:S151–S162

    Google Scholar 

  81. Reid JH, Murchison JT (1998) Acute right ventricular dilatation: a new helical CT sign of massive pulmonary embolism. Clin Radiol 53:694–698

    Google Scholar 

  82. Oliver TB, Reid JH, Murchison JT (1998) Interventricular septal shift due to massive pulmonary embolism shown by CT pulmonary angiography: an old sign revisited. Thorax 53:1092–1094

    Google Scholar 

  83. Wintersperger BJ, Stäbler A, Seemann M, Holzknecht N, Helmberger T, Fink U, Reiser MF (1999) Evaluation of right ventricular performance in patients with acute pulmonary embolism by helical CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 170:542–549

    Google Scholar 

  84. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Schoepf UJ, Kipfmueller F, Solomon SD, Costello P, Goldhaber SZ (2004) Right ventricular enlargement on chest computed tomography: prognostic role in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 109:2401–2404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Elliott CG (1992) Pulmonary physiology during pulmonary hypertension. Chest 101:S163–S171

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ghaye B, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M (2002) Non-traumatic thoracic emergencies: CT diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: the first 10 years. Eur Radiol 12:1886–1905

    Google Scholar 

  87. Kim KI, Müller NL, Mayo JR (1999) Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: utility of spiral CT. Radiology 210:693–697

    Google Scholar 

  88. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J (1999) Spiral angiography of the pulmonary circulation. Radiology 212:615–636

    Google Scholar 

  89. Garg K, Macey L (2003) Helical CT scanning in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Respiration 70:231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. MacDonald SL, Mayo JR (2003) Computed tomography of acute pulmonary embolism. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 24:217–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Cham MD, Yankelevitz DF, Shaham D, Shah AA, Sherman L, Lewis A, Rademaker J, Pearson G, Choi J, Wolff W, Prabhu PM, Galanski M, Clark RA, Sostman HD, Henschke CI, Pulmonary CT Angiography–Indirect CT Venography Cooperative Group (2000) Deep venous thrombosis: detection by using indirect CT venography. Radiology 2000:216:744–751

    Google Scholar 

  92. Loud PA, Katz DS, Bruce DA, Klippenstein DL, Grossman ZD (2001) Deep venous thrombosis with suspected pulmonary embolism: detection with combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography. Radiology 219:498–502

    Google Scholar 

  93. Garg K, Kemp JL, Russ PD, Barón AE (2001) Thromboembolic disease: variability of interobserver agreement in the interpretation of CT venography with CT pulmonary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 176:1043–1047

    Google Scholar 

  94. Simon M, Boiselle PM, Choi JR, Rosen MP, Reynolds K, Raptopoulos V (2001) Paddle-wheel CT display of pulmonary arteries and other lung structures: a new imaging approach—technical innovation. Am J Roentgenol 177:195–198

    Google Scholar 

  95. Wildberger JE, Niethammer MU, Klotz E, Schaller S, Wein BB, Günther RW (2001) Multi-slice CT for visualization of pulmonary embolism using perfusion weighted color maps. Fortschr Röntgenstr 173:289–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Jeong YJ, Lee KS, Yoon YC, Kim TS, Chung MJ, Kim S (2004) Evaluation of small pulmonary arteries by 16-slice multidetector computed tomography: optimum slab thickness in condensing transaxial images converted into maximum intensity projection images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Oudkerk M, VanBeek EJ, Wielopolski P, VanOoijen PM, Brouwers-Kuyper EM, Bongaerts AH, Berghout A (2002) Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective study. Lancet 359:1643–1647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Kluge A, Müller C, Hansel J, Gerriets T, Bachmann G (2004) Real-time MR with TrueFISP for the detection of acute pulmonary embolism: initial clinical experience. Eur Radiol 14:709–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Ohno Y, Higashino T, Takenaka D, Sugimoto K, Yoshikawa T, Kawai H, Fujii M, Hatabu H, Sugimura K (2004) MR angiography with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for suspected pulmonary embolism: comparison with MDCT and ventilation–perfusion scintigraphy. Am J Roentgenol 183:91–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Ryu JH, Swensen SJ, Olson EJ, Pellikka PA (2001) Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with use of computed tomographic angiography. Mayo Clin Proc 76:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  101. Perrier A, Nendaz MR, Sarasin FP, Howarth N, Bounameaux H (2003) Cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism including helical computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care 167:39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Perrier A, Roy PM, Aujesky D, Chagnon I, Howarth N, Gourdier AL, Leftheriotis G, Barghouth G, Cornuz J, Hayoz D, Bounameaux H (2004) Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. Am J Med 116:291–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, University of Technology (RWTH), Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany

    Joachim E. Wildberger, Andreas H. Mahnken, Marco Das & Rolf W. Günther

  2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany

    Axel Küttner

  3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Friedrich Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany

    Michael Lell

Authors
  1. Joachim E. Wildberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas H. Mahnken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marco Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Axel Küttner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael Lell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rolf W. Günther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim E. Wildberger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wildberger, J.E., Mahnken, A.H., Das, M. et al. CT imaging in acute pulmonary embolism: diagnostic strategies. Eur Radiol 15, 919–929 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2643-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2643-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation