Abstract
Metastases of the spine occur in the spinal cord, dura extramedullary, epidural space, and vertebral bodies. Imaging modalities can be used to evaluate patient symptoms, screen and detect lesions, assess localization and the compartments involved (extradural, epidural, subdural, and paraspinal), and suggest therapeutic strategies. The suggested flow chart for metastases is (1) in asymptomatic patients suspected for metastases and (2) in the patient with neurological symptoms. Imaging modalities are indispensable in differential diagnosis because some nontumoral lesions can mimic metastases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schiff D, O’Neill BP, Suman VJ (1997) Spinal epidural metastasis as the initial manifestation of malignancy: clinical features and diagnostic approach. Neurology 49:452–456
Layer G, Steudel A, Schuller H, van Kaick G, Grunwald F, Reiser M, Schild HH (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging to detect bone marrow metastases in the initial staging of small cell lung carcinoma and breast carcinoma. Cancer 85:1004–1009
Steinborn MM, Heuck AF, Tilling R et al (1999) Whole body bone marrow MRI in patients with metastatic disease to the skeletal system. J Cent Adv Telev Stud 23(1):123–129
Eustace S, Tello R, DeCarvalho V et al (1997) A comparison of whole body turbo STIR MR imaging and planar 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases. Am J Roentgenol 169(6):1655–1661
Daldrup-Link HE, Franzius C, Link TM et al (2001) Whole body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET. Am J Roentgenol 177:229–236
Engelhard K, Hollenbach HP, Wohlfart K et al (2004) Comparison of whole-body MRI with automatic moving table technique and bone scintigraphy for screening for bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 14(1):99–105
Kavanagh E, Smith C, Eustace S (2003) Whole-body turbo STIR MR imaging: controversies and avenues for development. Eur Radiol 13(9):2196–2205
Goyen M, Goehde SC, Herborn CU et al (2004) MR-based full-body preventative cardiovascular and tumor imaging: technique and preliminary experience. Eur Radiol 14(5):783–791
Mentzel HJ, Kentouche K, Sauner D et al (2004) Comparison of whole-body STIR-MRI and (99m) Tc-methylene-diphosphonate scintigraphy in children with suspected multifocal bone lesions. Eur Radiol 14(12):2297–2302. DOI 10.1007/s00330-004-2390-5
Kienstra GE, Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Cantal R, Bortslap AC, Tijssen JG (2000) Prediction of spina epidural metastases. Arch Neurol 57:690–695
Vanel D, Bittoun J, Tardivon A (1998) MRI of bone metastases. Eur Radiol 8:1345–1351
Yuh WTC, Zachar CK, Barloon TJ et al (1989) Vertebral compression fractures: distinction between benign and malignant causes with MR imaging. Radiology 172:215–218
Baur A, Stabler A, Bruning R et al (1998) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fracture. Radiology 207(2):349–356
Castillo M, Arbelaez A, Smith JK, Fisher LL (2000) Diffusion weighted MR imaging offers non advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases. Am J Neuroradiol 21(5):948–953
Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Adam G et al (2001) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiation of benign fracture edema and tumor infiltration of the vertebral body. Am J Roentgenol 176(2):351–358
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andreula, C., Murrone, M. Metastatic disease of the spine. Eur Radiol 15, 627–632 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2627-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2627-3