Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-sectional imaging of biliary tumors: current clinical status and future developments

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, including hilar cholangiocarcinoma, is a relatively rare diagnosis. However, it frequently has been associated with major problems in diagnostics and clinical management from its first comprehensive description by Klatskin up until today. In this article, cholangiocarcinoma, representing the most common biliary tumor, as well as the differential diagnoses of benign and malignant biliary obstruction, will be discussed. The latest improvements of cross-sectional imaging modalities (sonography, CT, MRI and PET) and their diagnostic values for detection and staging will be displayed. A practical imaging-based diagnostic approach to obstructive biliary disease will be proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9 a–d
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klatskin G (1965) Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic duct at its bifurcation within the porta hepatis. An unusual tumor with distinctive clinical and pathological. Am J Med 38:241–256

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA (2000) Cancer statistics (2000). CA Cancer J Clin 50:7–33

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cancer Research UK (2003) CancerStats—Incidence UK (April 2003). http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/statistics

  4. Lim JH, Kim MH, Kim TK et al (2003) Papillary neoplasms of the bile duct that mimic biliary stone disease. Radiographics 23:447–455

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levy AD, Murakata LA, Abbott RM, Rohrmann CA Jr (2002) From the archives of the AFIP. Benign tumors and tumorlike lesions of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 22:387–413

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knoefel WT, Prenzel KL, Peiper M et al (2003) Klatskin tumors and Klatskin mimicking lesions of the biliary tree. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:658–661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Inaba K, Suzuki S, Yokoi Y et al (2003) Hepatic inflammatory pseudotumor mimicking intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: report of a case. Surg Today 33:714–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bismuth H, Corlette MB (1975) Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 140:170–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Han JK, Choi BI, Kim AY et al (2002) Cholangiocarcinoma: pictorial essay of CT and cholangiographic findings. Radiographics 22:173–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Braga HJ, Imam K, Bluemke DA (2001) MR imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: use of ferumoxides for lesion localization and extension. Am J Roentgenol 177:111–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maetani Y, Itoh K, Watanabe C et al (2001) MR imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 176:1499–1507

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim JH, Kim MJ, Chung JJ, Lee WJ, Yoo HS, Lee JT (2002) Differential diagnosis of periampullary carcinomas at MR imaging. Radiographics 22:1335–1352

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tannapfel A, Wittekind C (2001) Anatomy and pathology of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct tumors. Pathologe 22:114–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Manfredi R, Masselli G, Maresca G, Brizi MG, Vecchioli A, Marano P (2003) MR imaging and MRCP of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 28:319–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cha JH, Han JK, Kim TK et al (2000) Preoperative evaluation of Klatskin tumor: accuracy of spiral CT in determining vascular invasion as a sign of unresectability. Abdom Imaging 25:500–507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lygidakis NJ, Sgourakis GJ, Dedemadi GV, Vlachos L, Safioleas M (2001) Long-term results following resectional surgery for Klatskin tumors. A twenty-year personal experience. Hepatogastroenterology 48:95–101

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bathe OF, Pacheco JT, Ossi PB et al (2001) Management of hilar bile duct carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 48:1289–1294

    Google Scholar 

  18. Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin R et al (2002) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: consensus document. Gut 51[Suppl 6]:VI 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn. Wiley, New York

  20. Weber SM, Jarnagin WR, Klimstra D, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Blumgart LH (2001) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: resectability, recurrence pattern, and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 193:384–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Courbiere M, Pilleul F, Henry L, Ponchon T, Touzet S, Valette PJ (2003) Value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in benign and malignant biliary stenosis: comparative study with direct cholangiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27:315–320

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yeh TS, Jan YY, Tseng JH et al (2000) Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic findings. Am J Gastroenterol 95:432–440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moon SG, Han JK, Kim (2003) Biliary obstruction in metastatic disease: thin-section helical CT findings. Abdom Imaging 28:45–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mulholland MW, Yahanda A, Yeo CJ (2001) Multidisciplinary management of perihilar bile duct cancer. J Am Coll Surg 193:440–447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A et al (2001) Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 96:417–423

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosch T, Meining A, Fruhmorgen S et al (2002) A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 55:870–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Burtin P, Palazzo L, Canard JM, Person B, Oberti F, Boyer J (1997) Diagnostic strategies for extrahepatic cholestasis of indefinite origin: endoscopic ultrasonography or retrograde cholangiography? Results of a prospective study. Endoscopy 29:349–355

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ponchon T (2000) Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 32:200–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bloom CM, Langer B, Wilson SR (1999) Role of US in the detection, characterization, and staging of cholangiocarcinoma. Radiographics 19:1199–1218

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Ota T, Satake H, Takai K, Ishigaki T (2003) Assessment of the pancreatic and intrapancreatic bile ducts using 0.5-mm collimation and multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT. Eur Radiol 13:277–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fletcher JG, Wiersema MJ, Farrell MA et al (2003) Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 229:81–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tillich M, Mischinger HJ, Preisegger KH, Rabl H, Szolar DH (1998) Multiphasic helical CT in diagnosis and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 171:651–658

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nesbit GM, Johnson CD, James EM, MacCarty RL, Nagorney DM, Bender CE (1988) Cholangiocarcinoma:diagnosis and evaluation of resectability by CT and sonography as procedures complementary to cholangiography. Am J Roentgenol 151:933–938

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gulliver DJ, Baker ME, Cheng CA, Meyers WC, Pappas TN (1992) Malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of thin-section dynamic CT in determining resectability. Am J Roentgenol 159:503–507

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Feydy A, Vilgrain V, Denys A et al (1999) Helical CT assessment in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings. Am J Roentgenol 172:73–77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Campbell WL, Peterson MS, Federle MP et al (2001) Using CT and cholangiography to diagnose biliary tract carcinoma complicating primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Roentgenol 177:1095–1100

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ochotorena IJ, Kiyosue H, Hori Y, Yokoyama S, Yoshida T, Mori H (2000) The local spread of lower bile duct cancer: evaluation by thin-section helical CT. Eur Radiol 10:1106–1113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Van Beers BE, Lacrosse M, Trigaux JP, de Canniere L, De Ronde T, Pringot J (1994) Noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: use of three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography. Am J Roentgenol 162:1331–1335

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Greenberg M, Greenberg BM, Rubin JM, Greenberg IM (1982) Computed-tomographic cholangiography: a new technique for evaluating the head of the pancreas and distal biliary tree. Radiology 144:363–368

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zandrino F, Benzi L, Ferretti ML, Ferrando R, Reggiani G, Musante F (2002) Multislice CT cholangiography without biliary contrast agent: technique and initial clinical results in the assessment of patients with biliary obstruction. Eur Radiol 12:1155–1161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Maniatis P, Triantopoulou C, Sofianou E et al (2003) Virtual CT cholangiography in patients with choledocholithiasis. Abdom Imaging 28:536–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Caoili EM, Paulson EK, Heyneman LE, Branch MS, Eubanks WS, Nelson RC (2000) Helical CT cholangiography with three-dimensional volume rendering using an oral biliary contrast agent: feasibility of a novel technique. Am J Roentgenol 174:487–492

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fulcher AS, Turner MA (1997) HASTE MR cholangiography in the evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 169:1501–1505

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hundt W, Petsch R, Scheidler J, Reiser M (2002) Clinical evaluation of further-developed MRCP sequences in comparison with standard MRCP sequences. Eur Radiol 12:1768–1777

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Prassopoulos P, Papanikolaou N, Maris T, Gogas C, Mouzas J, Gourtsoyiannis N (2002) Development of contrast-enhanced virtual MR cholangioscopy: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 12:1438–1441

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ba-Ssalamah A, Heinz-Peer G, Schima W et al (2000) Detection of focal hepatic lesions: comparison of unenhanced and SHU 555 A-enhanced MR imaging versus biphasic helical CTAP. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:665–672

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lee SS, Kim MH, Lee SK et al (2002) MR cholangiography versus cholangioscopy for evaluation of longitudinal extension of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 56:25–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lopera JE, Soto JA, Munera F (2001) Malignant hilar and perihilar biliary obstruction: use of MR cholangiography to define the extent of biliary ductal involvement and plan percutaneous interventions. Radiology 220:90–96

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, Panebianco V, Fabiano S, Passariello R (1999) MRI of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. Eur Radiol 9:1513–1522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Holzknecht N, Gauger J, Sackmann M et al (1998) Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 206:657–664

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wiedmann M, Caca K, Berr F et al (2003) Neoadjuvant photodynamic therapy as a new approach to treating hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a phase II pilot study. Cancer 97:2783–2790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lee MG, Park KB, Shin YM et al (2003) Preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast imaging with steady-state precession magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. World J Surg 27:278–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Smedby O, Riesenfeld V, Karlson B et al (1997) Magnetic resonance angiography in the resectability assessment of suspected pancreatic tumours. Eur Radiol 7:649–653

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Catalano C, Pavone P, Laghi A et al (1998) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: combination of MR imaging, MR angiography and MR cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis and assessment of resectability. Eur Radiol 8:428–434

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Fritscher-Ravens A, Bohuslavizki KH, Broering DC et al (2001) FDG PET in the diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 22:1277–1285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Keiding S, Hansen SB, Rasmussen HH et al (1998) Detection of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis by positron emission tomography. Hepatology 28:700–706

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kim YJ, Yun M, Lee WJ, Kim KS, Lee JD (2003) Usefulness of (18)F-FDG PET in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:1467–1472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph J. Zech.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zech, C.J., Schoenberg, S.O., Reiser, M. et al. Cross-sectional imaging of biliary tumors: current clinical status and future developments. Eur Radiol 14, 1174–1187 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2327-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2327-z

Keywords

Navigation