Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Percutaneous coil placement prior to radiofrequency ablation of poorly visible hepatic tumors

  • Vascular-Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish whether using a percutaneously inserted metallic coil as a target facilitates the radiofrequency (RF) ablation of tumors poorly seen on unenhanced computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US) studies. We inserted a metallic coil percutaneously via a 21-gauge needle under CT guidance into five tumors during the phase of contrast enhancement in five patients. The coil was subsequently used as a target to guide placement of the RF electrode under fluoroscopic guidance. The precision of position was then checked with CT or US. We also carried out a small experimental study to establish the effect of metallic coils on the pattern of coagulation induced by RF. Placement of a metallic coil into the tumor enabled rapid and accurate placement of the RF electrode. The tumors were ablated with no adverse effects. The experimental study showed that the area of coagulation extends predictably along the coil. The application of the above technique is useful when using RF to ablate tumors poorly visualized on US and unenhanced CT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Solbiati L, Ierace T, Tonolini M et al (2001) Radiofrequency thermal ablation of hepatic metastases. Eur J Ultrasound 13:149–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Livraghi T, Lazzaroni S, Meloni F (2001) Radiofrequency thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Ultrasound 13:159–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wood TF, Rose M, Chung M et al (2000) Radiofrequency ablation of 231 unresectable hepatic tumors: indications, limitations, and complications. Ann Surg Oncol 7:593–600

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong SL, Edwards MJ, Chao C et al (2001) Radiofrequency ablation for unresectable hepatic tumors. Am J Surg 182:552–557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buscarini E, Buscarini L (2003) Radiofrequency thermal ablation with expandable needle of focal liver malignancies. Eur Radiol 14:31–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sica GT, Ji H, Ros PR (2002) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of hepatic metastases. Clin Liver Dis 6:165–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pedro MS, Semelka RC, Braga L (2002) MR imaging of hepatic metastases. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 10:15–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Skjoldbye B, Pedersen MH, Struckmann J et al (2002) Improved detection and biopsy of solid liver lesions using pulse-inversion ultrasound scanning and contrast agent infusion. Ultrasound Med Biol 28:439–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Baere T, Bessoud B, Dromain C et al (2002) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors during temporary venous occlusion. Am J Roentgenol 178:53–59

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hohmann J, Skrok J, Puls R et al (2003) Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced low MI real time ultrasound and SonoVue. RoFo 175:835–843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boll DT, Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Merkle EM (2003) Do surgical clips interfere with radiofrequency thermal ablation? Am J Roentgenol 180:1557–1560

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Adam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adam, A., Hatzidakis, A., Hamady, M. et al. Percutaneous coil placement prior to radiofrequency ablation of poorly visible hepatic tumors. Eur Radiol 14, 1688–1691 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2294-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2294-4

Keywords

Navigation