Skip to main content
Log in

ASP archiving solution of regional HUSpacs

  • Computer Applications
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The application service provider (ASP) model is not novel, but widely used in several non-health care-related business areas. In this article, ASP is described as a potential solution for long-term and back-up archiving of the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) of the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS). HUSpacs is a regional PACS for 21 HUS hospitals serving altogether 1.4 million citizens. The ultimate goal of this study was to define the specifications for the ASP archiving service and to compare different commercial options for archiving solutions (costs derived by unofficial requests for proposal): in-house PACS components, the regional ASP concept and the hospital-based ASP concept. In conclusion, the large scale of the HUS installation enables a cost-effective regional ASP archiving, resulting in a four to five times more economical solution than hospital-based ASP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reed G, Reed DH (2000) The emerging PACS ASP model. Radiol Manag J Am Healthc Radiol Adm 22:50–54

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gustavsson S, Tylen U, Carlsson G, Angelhed J-E, Wintell M, Helmersson R, Norrby C (2001) Outsourced central archiving: an information bridge in a multi-IMAC environment. In: Proceedings of SPIE medical imaging 2001. PACS and integrated medical information systems: design and evaluation 4323:22

  3. Pohjonen H, Mäkelä S, Kauppinen T, Kinnunen J (2002) Specifications for an ASP model of HUSpacs. In: Niinimäki J, Ilkko E, Reponen J (eds) Proceedings of the 20th EuroPACS annual meeting. Oulu University Press, Oulu, pp 107–108

  4. Dreyer K (2001) ASP progress report: two early adopters report preliminary satisfaction with the keenly observed application service provider model. Decis Imaging Econ, J Imaging Technol Manag, Spring 2001 Inform 46

    Google Scholar 

  5. http://www.hl7.org (1/1/2004)

  6. NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) (2001) DICOM Publications PS 3.1-3.15-2001. Rosslyn, USA

  7. Mildenberger P, Eichelberg M, Martin E (2002) Introduction to the DICOM standard. Eur Radiol 12:920–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gray M (2000) Application service provider PACS: analyzing costs of service. Decis Imaging Econ, InternetHealthcare 2000:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu BJ, Cao F, Zhou MZ, Mogel G, Documet L (2003) Trends in PACS image storage and archive. Comput Med Imaging Graph 27:165–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reiner B, Siegek E (2001) Application service providers: an alternative approach to PACS implementation. J Digit Imaging 14:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dreyer KJ (2000) ASP model could bring PACS technology to the masses. Diagn Imaging 22:39–40, 43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baldwin FD (2002) Healthcare PACS for the future. Healthc Inform November:30–32

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their sincere thanks to the HUSpacs project team, especially to Mrs Anita Suhonen. Agfa-Gevaert is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna Pohjonen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pohjonen, H., Kauppinen, T. & Ahovuo, J. ASP archiving solution of regional HUSpacs. Eur Radiol 14, 1702–1706 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2291-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2291-7

Keywords

Navigation