European Radiology

, Volume 13, Supplement 5, pp 50–70 | Cite as

Multidetector CT of the colon

  • W. LuboldtEmail author
  • N. Hoepffner
  • K. Holzer


Multidetector technology, enabling faster imaging, higher spatial resolution and reduction in radiation dose, increases the role of CT in colonic diagnostic. The higher spatial resolution in the z-direction also changes the way to analyze the images. Instead of reading axial sections, now the colon can be systematically assessed in 3D by scrolling through multiplanar reconstructions or in CT colonography by virtual endoscopy. With ongoing improvements in computer-aided diagnosis CT colonography becomes an alternative to fiberoptic colonocopy for screening (http://www. In this article we propose a CT examination protocol for the colon, describe the typical imaging findings of different colonic diseases, and summarize the current status of CT colonography.


Multidetector CT Colon CT colonography 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kindblom LG, Remotti HE, Aldenborg F, Meis-Kindblom JM. (1998) Gastrointestinal pacemaker cell tumor (GIPACT): gastrointestinal stromal tumors show phenotypic characteristics of the interstitial cells of Cajal. Am J Pathol 152:1259–1269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miettinen M, Lasota J. (2001) Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: definition, clinical, histological, immunohis-tochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis. Virchows Arch 438:1–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rubin BP, Singer S, Tsao C et al. (2001) KIT activation is a ubiquitous feature of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res 61:8118–8121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Oosterom AT, Judson I, Verweij J et al. (2001) Safety and efficacy of imatinib (STI571) in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a phase I study. Lancet 358:1421–1423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singer S, Rubin BP, Lux ML et al. (2002) Prognostic value of KIT mutation type, mitotic activity, and histologic subtype in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol 20:3898–3905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burkill GJ, Badran M, Al-Muderis O et al. (2003) Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor: distribution, imaging features, and pattern of metastatic spread. Radiology 226:527–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thoeni RF (1997) Colorectal cancer. Radiologic staging. Radiol Clin North Am 35:457–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    (1997) Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. N Engl J Med 336:980–987Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Camma C, Giunta M, Fiorica F, Pagliaro L, Craxi A, Cottone M (2000) Preoperative radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 284:1008–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sauer R, Fietkau R, Wittekind C et al. (2001) Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. A progress report of a phase-Ill randomized trial (protocol CAO/ARO/AIO-94). Strahlenther Onkol 177:173–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Toribara NW, Sleisenger MH (1995) Screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 332:861–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, Libbe SD, Ilstrup DM, MacCarty RL (1987) Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 93:1009–1013PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L et al. (1997) Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 112:594–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL et al. (2002) SEER (surveillance, epidemiology and end results) Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1999, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, Maryland. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ayre-Smith G (1976) Hyoscine-N-butylbromide (Buscopan) as a duodenal relaxant in tubeless duodenography. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 17(5B):701–713Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luboldt W, Fletcher JG, Vogl TJ (2002) Colonography: current status, research directions and challenges. Update 2002. Eur Radiol 12:502–524 ( Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219:685–692PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wessling J, Fischbach R, Domagk D, Lugering N, Neumann E, Heindel W (2001) Colorectal polyps: detection with multi-slice CT colonography. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173:1069–1071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gluecker T, Dorta G, Keller W, Jornod P, Meuli R, Schnyder P (2002) Performance of multidetector computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Gut 51:207–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X et al. (2002) Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 224:383–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Carbone I et al. (2000) Detection of colorectal lesions with virtual computed tomographic colonography. Am J Surg 183:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Luboldt W, Mann C, Tryon CL et al. (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast. Eur Radiol 12:2236–2241 (www. Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bekanntmachungen (2002) Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses der Aerzte und Krankenkassen ueber die Frueherkenn-ung von Krebserkrankungen (“Krebsfrueherkennungs-Richtlinien”). Dtsch Arztebl 99:A2650–2653 ( Scholar
  24. 24.
    Garvican L (1998) Planning for a possible national colorectal cancer screening programme. J Med Screen 5:187–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jung H (1995) Health risks due to radiation exposure. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 162:91–98 [in German]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cochran ST, Bomyea K, Sayre JW (2001) Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media. Am J Roentgenol 176:1385–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K (1990) Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 175:621–628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Luboldt W, Hoepffner N, Holzer K et al. (2003) [Early detection of colorectal tumors: CT or MRI?]. Radiologe 43:136–150 ( [in German]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyJ.W. Goethe University FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Department of Internal Medicine and GastroenterologyJ.W. Goethe University FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryJ.W. Goethe University FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations