Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The distribution, abundance, status and global importance of giant petrels (Macronectes giganteus and M. halli) breeding at South Georgia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Information on the status of giant petrels breeding at South Georgia was previously based on studies at a small number of the archipelago's breeding sites. Here, we report the results of the first complete archipelago-wide survey of breeding northern Macronectes halli and southern M. giganteus giant petrels in the austral summers 2005/2006 and 2006/2007. We estimate that 15,398 pairs of northern and 8803 pairs of southern giant petrels bred at South Georgia. These are the largest and second largest populations at any island group, representing 71.0% and 17.3%, respectively, of updated global estimates of 21,682 pairs of northern and 50,819 pairs of southern giant petrels. A comparison of counts at locations surveyed in both 1986/1987–1987/1988 and 2005/2006–2006/2007 indicated increases of 74% and 27% in northern and southern giant petrels, respectively, over the intervening 18–20 years. The greater increase in northern giant petrels was likely influenced by the recovery of the Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella population at South Georgia, which provides an abundant but transient food resource (carrion). Due to allochrony, this provides greater benefits to northern giant petrels. The large, and increasing, population of king penguins Aptenodytes patagonicus at South Georgia also provides a potentially valuable food resource. The flexible and opportunistic foraging behaviour of giant petrels has contributed to their positive population trends. Other, more specialised, seabirds such as albatrosses have declined at South Georgia in recent decades mainly because of problems at sea, compounded by greater predation pressure from the increasing populations of giant petrels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels (2010a) ACAP Species assessments: Northern Giant Petrel Macronectes halli. https://www.acap.aq. Accessed 13 Oct 2010. ACAP Species assessments: Northern Giant Petrel Macronectes halli. https://www.acap.aq. Accessed 13 Oct 2010

  • Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels (2010b) Species assessments: Southern Giant Petrel Macronectes giganteus. https://www.acap.aq. Accessed 20 Oct 2010. Species assessments: Southern Giant Petrel Macronectes giganteus. https://www.acap.aq. Accessed 20 Oct 2010

  • Ashford JR, Croxall JP, Rubilar PS, Moreno CA (1995) Seabird interactions with longlining operations for Dissostichus eleginoides around South Georgia, April to May 1994. CCAMLR Sci 2:111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrow SD, Croxall JP, Grant SD (2000) Status of white-chinned petrels Procellaria aequinoctialis Linnaeus 1758, at Bird Island, South Georgia. Antarct Sci 12:399–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International (2018) IUCN Red List for birds. https://www.birdlife.org. Accessed 05 April 2018. IUCN Red List for birds. https://www.birdlife.org. Accessed 05 April 2018

  • Bonner WN, Hunter S (1982) Predatory interactions between Antarctic fur seals, macaroni penguins and giant petrels. Br Antarct Surv Bull 56:75–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd IL (1989) Spatial and temporal distribution of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) on the breeding grounds at Bird Island, South Georgia. Polar Biol 10:179–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd IL (1993) Pup production and distribution of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) at South Georgia. Antarct Sci 5:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RM, Techow NMSM, Wood AG, Phillips RA (2015) Hybridization and back-crossing in giant petrels (Macronectes giganteus and M. halli) at Bird Island, South Georgia, and a summary of hybridization in seabirds. PLoS ONE 10:e0121688. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A, Croxall JP, Poncet S, Martin AP, Burton RW (2012) Important bird areas: South Georgia. Br Birds 105:118–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper J, Brooke MDL, Burger AE, Crawford RJM, Hunter S, Williams AJ (2001) Aspects of the breeding biology of the Northern Giant Petrel (Macronectes halli) and the Southern Giant Petrel (M. giganteus) at sub-Antarctic Marion Island. lnt J Ornithol 4:53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Copello S, Quintana F (2009) Spatio-temporal relationship between Southern Giant Petrels and fisheries at the Patagonian Shelf. Polar Biol 32:1211–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copello S, Quintana F, Perez F (2008) The diet of the Southern Giant Petrel in Patagonia: fishery-related items and natural prey. Endanger Species Res 6:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copello S, Dogliotti AI, Gagliardini DA, Quintana F (2011) Oceanographic and biological landscapes used by the Southern Giant Petrel during the breeding season at the Patagonian Shelf. Mar Biol 158:1247–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creuwels JCS, Stark JS, Woehler EJ, Ribic CA (2005) Monitoring of a Southern Giant Petrel Macronectes giganteus population on the Frazier Islands, Wilkes Land, Antarctica. Polar Biol 28:483–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristofari R, Liu X, Bonadonna F, Cherel Y, Pistorius P, Le Maho Y, Raybaud V, Stenseth NC, Le Bohec C, Trucchi E (2018) Climate-driven range shifts of the king penguin in a fragmented ecosystem. Nat Clim Change 8:245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croxall JP, Rivera K, Moreno AC (2007) Seabird bycatch mitigation: The southern ocean (CCAMLR) experience. In: Kennelly S (ed) By-catch reduction in the world's fisheries (reviews: methods and technologies in fish biology and fisheries). Springer, Dordrecht, pp 271–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Delord K, Besson D, Barbraud C, Weimerskirch H (2008) Population trends in a community of large Procellariiforms of Indian Ocean: potential effects of environment and fisheries interactions. Biol Conserv 141:1840–1856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descamps S, Gauthier-Clerc M, Le Bohec C, Gendner J-P, Le Maho Y (2005) Impact of predation on king penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus in Crozet Archipelago. Polar Biol 28:303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilley BJ, Davies D, Connan M, Cooper J, de Villiers M, Swart L, Vandenabeele S, Ropert-Coudert Y, Ryan PG (2013) Giant petrels as predators of albatross chicks. Polar Biol 36:761–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn MJ, Jackson JA, Adlard S, Phillips RA (2015) Population size and trends of southern giant petrels (Macronectes giganteus) nesting at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Polar Biol 39:1309–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley CM, Hart T, Lynch HJ (2018) King Penguin populations increase on South Georgia but explanations remain elusive. Polar Biol 41:1111–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forcada J, Hoffman JI (2014) Climate change selects for heterozygosity in a declining fur seal population. Nature 511:462–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forcada J, Trathan PN, Reid K, Murphy EJ (2005) The effects of global climate variability in pup production of Antarctic fur seals. Ecology 86:2408–2417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forero M, González-Solís J, Hobson K, Donázar J, Bertellotti M, Blanco G, R. Bortolotti G, (2005) Stable isotopes reveal trophic segregation by sex and age in the Southern Giant Petrel in two different food webs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 296:107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster IP, Phillips RA (2009) Influence of nest location, density and topography on breeding success in the Black-browed Albatross Thalassarche melanophris. Mar Ornithol 37:213–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianuca D, Votier SC, Pardo D, Wood AG, Ireland L, Choquet R, Pradel R, Townley S, Forcada J, Tuck G, Sherley RB, Phillips RA (2019) Sex-specific effects of fisheries and climate on the demography of sexually dimporphic seabirds. J Anim Ecol 88:1366–1378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzáles-Solís J (2004) Sexual size dimorphism in northern giant petrels: ecological correlates and scaling. Oikos 105:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Solís J, Croxall JP, Wood AG (2000a) Foraging partitioning between giant petrels Macronectes spp. and its relationship with breeding population changes at Bird Island. South Georgia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 204:279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Solís J, Croxall JP, Wood AG (2000b) Sexual dimorphism and sexual segregation in foraging strategies of northern giant petrels, Macronectes halli, during incubation. Oikos 90:390–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Solís J, Croxall JP, Afanasyev V (2008) Offshore spatial segregation in Giant Petrels Macronectes spp.: differences between species, sexes and seasons. Aquat Conserv 17:S22–S36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granroth-Wilding HMV, Phillips RA (2019) Segregation in space and time explains the coexistence of two sympatric sub-Antarctic petrels. Ibis 161:101–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSGSSI (2017) South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands Implementation Plan for the Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels (ACAP) 2016–2020. Goverment of South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands, Stanley

  • Horswill C, Matthiopoulos J, Green JA, Meredith MP, Forcada J, Peat H, Preston M, Trathan PN, Ratcliffe N (2014) Survival in macaroni penguins and the relative importance of different drivers: individual traits, predation pressure and environmental variability. J Anim Ecol 83:1057–1067

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Horswill C, Ratcliffe N, Green JA, Phillips RA, Trathan PN, Matthiopoulos J (2016) Unravelling the relative roles of top-down and bottom-up forces driving population change in an oceanic predator. Ecology 97:1919–1928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter S (1983) The food and feeding ecology of the giant petrels Macronectes halli and M. giganteus at South Georgia. J Zool (Lond.) 200:521–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter S (1984) Breeding biology and population dynamics of giant petrels Macronectes at South Georgia (Aves: Procellariiformes). J Zool (Lond.) 203:441–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter S (1987) Species and sexual isolating mechanisms in sibling species of giant petrels Macronectes. Polar Biol 7:295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter S (1991) The impact of avian predator-scavengers on King Penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus chicks at Marion Island. Ibis 133:343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter S, Brooke M (1992) The diet of giant petrels Macronectes spp. at Marion Island. Southern Indian Ocean. Colon Waterbirds 15:56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson AL, Bearhop S, Thompson DR (2005) Shape can influence the rate of colony fragmentation in ground nesting seabirds. Oikos 111:473–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger L, Paiva V, Petry M, Ramos J (2017) Seabird breeding population size on the Antarctic Peninsula related to fisheries activities in non-breeding ranges off South America. Antarct Sci 29:495–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bohec C, Gauthier-Clerc M, Gendner JP, Chatelain N, Le Maho Y (2003) Nocturnal predation of king penguins by giant petrels on the Crozet Islands. Polar Biol 26:587–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otley H, Reid T, Phillips R, Wood A, Phalan B, Forster I (2007) Origin, age, sex and breeding status of wandering albatrosses (Diomedea exulans), northern (Macronectes halli) and southern giant petrels (Macronectes giganteus) attending demersal longliners in Falkland Islands and Scotia Ridge waters, 2001–2005. Polar Biol 30:359–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson DL, Woehler EJ, Croxall JP, Cooper J, Poncet S, Peter HU, Hunter S, Fraser WR (2008) Breeding distribution and population status of the Northern Giant Petrel Macronectes halli and the Southern Giant Petrel M. giganteus. Mar. Ornithol 36:115–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne MR (1977) Growth of a fur seal population. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 279:67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RA, Bearhop S, McGill RAR, Dawson DA (2009) Stable isotopes reveal individual variation in migration strategies and habitat preferences in a suite of seabirds during the nonbreeding period. Oecologia 160:795–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RA, McGill RAR, Dawson DA, Bearhop S (2011) Sexual segregation in distribution, diet and trophic level of seabirds: insights from stable isotope analysis. Mar Biol 158:2199–2208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RA, Gales R, Baker GB, Double MC, Favero M, Quintana F, Tasker ML, Weimershirch H, Uhart M, Wolfaardt A (2016) The conservation status and priorities for albatrosses and large petrels. Biol Conserv 201:169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poncet S (2006) South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. In: Sanders SM (ed) Important Bird Areas in the United Kingdom Overseas Territories. RSPB, Sandy, UK, pp 211–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Poncet S, Wolfaardt AC, Black A, Browning S, Lawton K, Lee J, Passfield K, Strange G, Phillips RA (2017) Recent trends in numbers of wandering (Diomedea exulans), black-browed (Thalassarche melanophris) and grey-headed (T. chrysostoma) albatrosses breeding at South Georgia. Polar Biol 40:1347–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintana F, Punta G, Copello S, Yorio P (2006) Population status and trends of Southern Giant Petrels (Macronectes giganteus) breeding in North Patagonia, Argentina. Polar Biol 30:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid TA, Huin N (2008) Census of Southern Giant Petrel population of the Falkland Islands 2004/2005. Bird Conserv Int 18:118–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan PG, Sommer E, Breytenbach E (2008) Giant petrels Macronectes hunting northern rockhopper penguins Eudyptes moseleyi at sea. Ardea 96:129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan PG, Jones MGW, Dyer BM, Upfold L, Crawford RJM (2009) Recent population estimates and trends in numbers of albatrosses and giant petrels breeding at the sub-Antarctic Prince Edward Islands. Afr J Mar Sci 31:409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stonehouse B (1956) The king penguin of South Georgia. Nature 178:1424–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tancell C, Sutherland WJ, Phillips RA (2016) Marine spatial planning for the conservation of albatrosses and large petrels breeding at South Georgia. Biol Conserv 198:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trathan PN, Ratcliffe N, Masden EA (2012) Ecological drivers of change at South Georgia: the krill surplus, or climate variability. Ecography 35:983–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varty N, Sullivan B, Black A (2008) FAO International plan of action-seabirds: an assessment for fisheries operating in South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands. BirdLife International Global Seabird Programme. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire

  • Voisin J-F (1988) Breeding biology of the northern giant petrel Macronectes halli and the southern giant petrel M. giganteus at Ile de la Possession, Iles Crozet, 1966–1980. Cormorant 16:65–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Wienecke B, Leaper R, Hay I, van den Hoff J (2009) Retrofitting historical data in population studies: southern giant petrels in the Australian Antarctic Territory. Endanger Species Res 8:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfaardt A, Phillips R (2011) Guideline census methodologies for albatrosses and petrels. Joint fourth meeting of ACAP’s Breeding Sites Working Group (BSWG4) and Sixth meeting of Status and Trends Working Group (STWG6). Doc 06. Guyuaquil, Ecuador, 25–26 August, 2011.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Data collection for this study was achieved by the combined efforts and expertise of fieldworkers and crew working from the vessels S/V Golden Fleece and S/V Tara V, and in particular we thank Dion Poncet, Russell Evans, Stevie Cartwright, Ken Passfield, Kilian du Couedic, Leiv Poncet, Olly Watts, Carolina Mantella, Micky Reeves, Ellen MacArthur, Fran Prince and Andy Whittaker. We are very grateful to Helen Taylor and other British Antarctic Survey fieldworkers for assistance with the Bird Island surveys. This study was funded by the Government of South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands, and the United Kingdom’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office Overseas Territories Environment Programme. It represents a contribution to the Ecosystems Component of the British Antarctic Survey Polar Science for Planet Earth Programme, funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). We thank Ben Dilley, Kris Carlyon and an anonymous reviewer for valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton C. Wolfaardt.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poncet, S., Wolfaardt, A.C., Barbraud, C. et al. The distribution, abundance, status and global importance of giant petrels (Macronectes giganteus and M. halli) breeding at South Georgia. Polar Biol 43, 17–34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-019-02608-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-019-02608-y

Keywords

Navigation