Polar Biology

, Volume 41, Issue 9, pp 1763–1775 | Cite as

Effect of temperature on bacterial community in petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated and uncontaminated Antarctic soil

  • C. W. Chong
  • S. Silvaraj
  • Y. Supramaniam
  • I. Snape
  • I. K. P. Tan
Original Paper


It is generally accepted that bacterial diversity in a community confers resistance to environmental perturbation. Communities with high bacterial diversity are less likely to be impacted by environmental changes such as warming. As such, hydrocarbon-contaminated Antarctic soil that are typically characterised by low bacterial diversity and highly selective taxonomic composition are expected to be more sensitive to changes in temperature than uncontaminated Antarctic soil. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the response of bacterial community structure to warming of hydrocarbon-contaminated and uncontaminated soil collected from Casey Station, Windmill Island, East Antarctica by using microcosms incubated at 5, 10 and 15 °C over a period of 12 weeks. Our results showed that shifts occurred in the bacterial community in relation to the incubation temperatures in both the hydrocarbon-contaminated and uncontaminated soil, with a stronger response observed in the contaminated soil. Taxa referred as comprising hydrocarbon-degrading genera such as Rhodococcus, was the most prevalent genus in the contaminated soil after incubation at 15 °C, accounting for approximately 32–50% of the total detected genera. However, there were no significant differences in the selected functional genes, potentially suggesting high levels of metabolic plasticity in the studied soil bacterial communities. Overall, we showed that hydrocarbon contamination in soil might lead to lower bacterial community stability against environmental perturbation such as temperature variation.


Antarctic soil Bacterial community plasticity Functional gene abundance Soil microcosm 



The HC and UC Antarctic soils were kindly provided by the Australian Antarctic Division through Australian Antarctic Science Project #4036 (Remediation of Petroleum Contaminants in the Antarctic and subantarctic). This work was funded by UMRG (RP007-2012B) and YPASM fellowship (IMUR121/12). The authors thank University of Malaya and International Medical University for providing research facility and support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

300_2018_2316_MOESM1_ESM.docx (24 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)


  1. Abdo Z, Schüette UME, Bent SJ, Williams CJ, Forney LJ, Joyce P (2006) Statistical methods for characterizing diversity of microbial communities by analysis of terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of 16S rRNA genes. Environ Microbiol 8:929–938. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams BJ, Bardgett RD, Ayres E, Wall DH, Aislabie J, Bamforth S, Bargagli R, Cary C, Cavacini P, Connell L, Convey P, Fell JW, Frati F, Hogg ID, Newsham KK, O’Donnell A, Russell N, Seppelt RD, Stevens MI (2006) Diversity and distribution of Victoria Land biota. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3003–3018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adriaenssens EM, Guerrero LD, Makhalanyane TP, Aislabie JM, Cowan DA (2014) Draft genome sequence of the aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium Sphingobium sp. Strain Ant17, isolated from Antarctic soil. Genome Announc. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Aghamollaei H, Moghaddam MM, Kooshki H, Heiat M, Mirnejad R, Barzi NS (2015) Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by a triplex polymerase chain reaction assay based on lasI R and gyrB genes. J Infect Public Health 8:314–322. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aislabie JM, Fraser R, Duncan S, Farrell RL (2001) Effects of oil spills on microbial heterotrophs in Antarctic soils. Polar Biol 24:308–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aislabie JM, Balks MR, Foght JM, Waterhouse EJ (2004) Hydrocarbon spills on Antarctic soils: effects and management. Environ Sci Technol 38:1265–1274. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Aislabie JM, Saul DJ, Foght JM (2006) Bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated polar soils. Extremophiles 10:171–179. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Allison SD, Martiny JBH (2008) Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11512–11519. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
  10. Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  11. Awasthi A, Singh M, Soni SK, Singh R, Kalra A (2014) Biodiversity acts as insurance of productivity of bacterial communities under abiotic perturbations. ISME J 8:2445–2452. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Balks MR, Paetzold RF, Kimble JM, Aislabie JM, Campbell IB (2002) Effects of hydrocarbon spills on the temperature and moisture regimes of Cryosols in the Ross Sea region. Antarctic Sci 14:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bargagli R (2008) Environmental contamination in Antarctic ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 400:212–226. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bennett JR, Shaw JD, Terauds A, Smol JP, Aerts R, Bergstrom DM, Blais JM, Cheung WWL, Chown SL, Lea MA, Nielsen UN, Pauly D, Reimer KJ, Riddle MJ, Snape I, Stark JS, Tulloch VJ, Possingham HP (2015) Polar lessons learned: long-term management based on shared threats in Arctic and Antarctic environments. Front Ecol Environ 13:316–324. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bissett A, Richardson AE, Baker G, Thrall PH (2011) Long-term land use effects on soil microbial community structure and function. Appl Soil Ecol 51:66–78. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bokhorst S, Huiskes A, Convey P, Aerts R (2007) Climate change effects on organic matter decomposition rates in ecosystems from the Maritime Antarctic and Falkland Islands. Glob Change Biol 13:2642–2653. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cary SC, McDonald IR, Barrett JE, Cowan DA (2010) On the rocks: the microbiology of Antarctic Dry Valley soils. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:129–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chong CW, Tan GYA, Wong RCS, Riddle MJ, Tan IKP (2009) DGGE fingerprinting of bacteria in soils from eight ecologically different sites around Casey Station, Antarctica. Polar Biol 32:853–860. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chong CW, Pearce DA, Convey P, Tan GYA, Wong RCS, Tan IKP (2010) High levels of spatial heterogeneity in the biodiversity of soil prokaryotes on Signy Island, Antarctica. Soil Biol Biochem 42:601–610. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chong CW, Pearce DA, Convey P, Tan IKP (2012) The identification of environmental parameters which could influence soil bacterial community composition on the Antarctic Peninsula—a statistical approach. Antarct Sci 24:249–258. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chong CW, Pearce DA, Convey P (2015) Emerging spatial patterns in Antarctic prokaryotes. Front Microbiol 6:1058CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Coulon F, Pelletier E, Gourhant L, Delille D (2005) Effects of nutrient and temperature on degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated sub-Antarctic soil. Chemosphere 58:1439–1448. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Culman SW, Bukowski R, Gauch HG, Cadillo-Quiroz H, Buckley DH (2009) T-REX: software for the processing and analysis of T-RFLP data. BMC Bioinform 10:171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cury JC, Jurelevicius DA, Villela HDM, Jesus HE, Peixoto RS, Schaefer CEGR, Bícego MC, Seldin L, Rosado AS (2015) Microbial diversity and hydrocarbon depletion in low and high diesel-polluted soil samples from Keller Peninsula, South Shetland Islands. Antarct Sci 27:263–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. de Scally SZ, Makhalanyane TP, Frossard A, Hogg ID, Cowan DA (2016) Antarctic microbial communities are functionally redundant, adapted and resistant to short term temperature perturbations. Soil Biol Biochem 103:160–170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Delille D, Pelletier E, Rodriguez-Blanco A, Ghiglione J-F (2009) Effects of nutrient and temperature on degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in sub-Antarctic coastal seawater. Polar Biol 32:1521–1528. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dennis PG, Newsham KK, Rushton SP, Ord VJ, O’Donnell AG, Hopkins DW (2013) Warming constrains bacterial community responses to nutrient inputs in a southern, but not northern, maritime Antarctic soil. Soil Biol Biochem 57:248–255. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dias RL, Ruberto L, Calabró A, Balbo AL, Del Panno MT, Mac Cormack WP (2015) Hydrocarbon removal and bacterial community structure in on-site biostimulated biopile systems designed for bioremediation of diesel-contaminated Antarctic soil. Polar Biol 38:677–687. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Espínola F, Dionisi HM, Borglin S, Brislawn CJ, Jansson JK, Mac Cormack WP, Carroll J, Sjöling S, Lozada M (2018) Metagenomic analysis of subtidal sediments from polar and subpolar coastal environments highlights the relevance of anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation processes. Microb Ecol 75:123–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fell JW, Scorzetti G, Connell L, Craig S (2006) Biodiversity of micro-eukaryotes in Antarctic Dry Valley soils with < 5% soil moisture. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3107–3119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferguson SH, Powell SM, Snape I, Gibson JAE, Franzmann PD (2008) Effect of temperature on the microbial ecology of a hydrocarbon-contaminated Antarctic soil: implications for high temperature remediation. Cold Reg Sci Technol 53:115–129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB (2007) Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88:1354–1364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Filler DM, Snape I, Barnes DL (2008) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in cold regions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fryirs KA, Hafsteinsdóttir EG, Stark SC, Gore DB (2015) Metal and petroleum hydrocarbon contamination at Wilkes Station, East Antarctica. Antarct Sci 27:118–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Han J, Jung J, Park M, Hyun S, Park W (2013) Short-term effect of elevated temperature on the abundance and diversity of bacterial and archaeal amoA genes in Antarctic soils. J Microbiol Biotechnol 23:1187–1196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Isbell F, Craven D, Connolly J, Loreau M, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Bezemer TM, Bonin C, Bruelheide H, de Luca E, Ebeling A, Griffin JN, Guo Q, Hautier Y, Hector A, Jentsch A, Kreyling J, Lanta V, Manning P, Meyer ST, Mori AS, Naeem S, Niklaus PA, Polley HW, Reich PB, Roscher C, Seabloom EW, Smith MD, Thakur MP, Tilman D, Tracy BF, van der Putten WH, van Ruijven J, Weigelt A, Weisser WW, Wilsey B, Eisenhauer N (2015) Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes. Nature 526:574–577. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Labud V, Garcia C, Hernandez T (2007) Effect of hydrocarbon pollution on the microbial properties of a sandy and a clay soil. Chemosphere 66:1863–1871. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lamb EG, Han S, Lanoil BD, Henry GHR, Brummell ME, Banerjee S, Siciliano SD (2011) A High Arctic soil ecosystem resists long-term environmental manipulations. Glob Change Biol 17:3187–3194. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ludescher J, Bunde A, Franzke CLE, Schellnhuber HJ (2016) Long-term persistence enhances uncertainty about anthropogenic warming of Antarctica. Clim Dyn 46:263–271. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McDonald R, Knox OGG (2014) Cold region bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils: do we know enough? Environ Sci Technol 48:9980–9981. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. McWatters RS, Wilkins D, Spedding T, Hince G, Raymond B, Lagerewskij G, Terry D, Wise L, Snape I (2016) On site remediation of a fuel spill and soil reuse in Antarctica. Sci Total Environ 571:963–973. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Muangchinda C, Chavanich S, Viyakarn V, Watanabe K, Imura S, Vangnai AS, Pinyakong O (2015) Abundance and diversity of functional genes involved in the degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons in Antarctic soils and sediments around Syowa Station. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:4725–4735. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Powell SM, Ferguson SH, Bowman JP, Snape I (2006) Using real-time PCR to assess changes in the hydrocarbon-degrading microbial community in Antarctic soil during bioremediation. Microb Ecol 52:523–532. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rinnan R, Rousk J, Yergeau E, Kowalchuk GA, Baath E (2009) Temperature adaptation of soil bacterial communities along an Antarctic climate gradient: predicting responses to climate warming. Glob Change Biol 15:2615–2625. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saul DJ, Aislabie JM, Brown CE, Harris L, Foght JM (2005) Hydrocarbon contamination changes the bacterial diversity of soil from around Scott Base, Antarctica. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53:141–155. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith CJ, Danilowicz BS, Clear AK, Costello FJ, Wilson B, Meijer WG (2005) T-Align, a web-based tool for comparison of multiple terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism profiles. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 54:375–380. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Supramaniam Y, Chong CW, Silvaraj S, Tan IKP (2016) Effect of short term variation in temperature and water content on the bacterial community in a tropical soil. Appl Soil Ecol 107:279–289. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tin T, Fleming ZL, Hughes KA, Ainley DG, Convey P, Moreno CA, Pfeiffer S, Scott J, Snape I (2009) Impacts of local human activities on the Antarctic environment. Antarct Sci 21:3–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Turner J, Barrand NE, Bracegirdle TJ, Convey P, Hodgson DA, Jarvis M, Jenkins A, Marshall G, Meredith MP, Roscoe H (2014) Antarctic climate change and the environment: an update. Polar Rec 50:237–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Turner J, Lu H, White I, King JC, Phillips T, Hosking JS, Bracegirdle TJ, Marshall GJ, Mulvaney R, Deb P (2016) Absence of 21st century warming on Antarctic Peninsula consistent with natural variability. Nature 535:411–415. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. van Dorst J, Siciliano SD, Winsley T, Snape I, Ferrari BC (2014) Bacterial targets as potential indicators of diesel fuel toxicity in subantarctic soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:4021–4033. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. van Dorst JM, Hince G, Snape I, Ferrari BC (2016) Novel culturing techniques select for heterotrophs and hydrocarbon degraders in a subantarctic soil. Sci Rep 6:36724. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Vazquez S, Monien P, Pepino Minetti R, Jurgens J, Curtosi A, Villalba Primitz J, Frickenhaus S, Abele D, Mac Cormack W, Helmke E (2017) Bacterial communities and chemical parameters in soils and coastal sediments in response to diesel spills at Carlini Station, Antarctica. Sci Total Environ 605–606:26–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Vázquez S, Nogales B, Ruberto L, Hernandez E, Christie-Oleza J, Lo Balbo A, Bosch R, Lalucat J, Mac Cormack W (2009) Bacterial community dynamics during bioremediation of diesel oil-contaminated Antarctic soil. Microb Ecol 57:598–610. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Vázquez S, Nogales B, Ruberto L, Mestre C, Christie-Oleza J, Ferrero M, Bosch R, Mac Cormack WP (2013) Characterization of bacterial consortia from diesel-contaminated Antarctic soils: towards the design of tailored formulas for bioaugmentation. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 77:22–30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ward NL, Challacombe JF, Janssen PH, Henrissat B, Coutinho PM, Wu M, Xie G, Haft DH, Sait M, Badger J, Barabote RD, Bradley B, Brettin TS, Brinkac LM, Bruce D, Creasy T, Daugherty SC, Davidsen TM, DeBoy RT, Detter JC, Dodson RJ, Durkin AS, Ganapathy A, Gwinn-Giglio M, Han CS, Khouri H, Kiss H, Kothari SP, Madupu R, Nelson KE, Nelson WC, Paulsen I, Penn K, Ren Q, Rosovitz MJ, Selengut JD, Shrivastava S, Sullivan SA, Tapia R, Thompson LS, Watkins KL, Yang Q, Yu C, Zafar N, Zhou L, Kuske CR (2009) Three genomes from the phylum Acidobacteria provide insight into the lifestyles of these microorganisms in soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2046–2056. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Wertz S, Degrange V, Prosser JI, Poly F, Commeaux C, Guillaumaud N, Le Roux X (2007) Decline of soil microbial diversity does not influence the resistance and resilience of key soil microbial functional groups following a model disturbance. Environ Microbiol 9:2211–2219. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Yang S, Wen X, Shi Y, Liebner S, Jin H, Perfumo A (2016) Hydrocarbon degraders establish at the costs of microbial richness, abundance and keystone taxa after crude oil contamination in permafrost environments. Sci Rep 6:37473. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Yergeau E, Kowalchuk GA (2008) Responses of Antarctic soil microbial communities and associated functions to temperature and freeze-thaw cycle frequency. Environ Microbiol 10:2223–2235. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Yergeau E, Bokhorst S, Kang S, Zhou J, Greer CW, Aerts R, Kowalchuk GA (2012) Shifts in soil microorganisms in response to warming are consistent across a range of Antarctic environments. ISME J 6:692–702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Life Sciences, School of PharmacyInternational Medical UniversityKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Centre of Translational Research, Institute for Research, Development and InnovationInternational Medical UniversityKuala LumpurMalaysia
  3. 3.National Antarctic Research Centre, Institute of Graduate StudiesUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  4. 4.Faculty of Science, Institute of Biological SciencesUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  5. 5.Australian Antarctic DivisionKingstonAustralia

Personalised recommendations