Polar Biology

, Volume 41, Issue 6, pp 1257–1267 | Cite as

Crustacean zooplankton in lakes of the far north of Ontario, Canada

  • Josef MacLeod
  • Wendel KellerEmail author
  • Andrew M. Paterson
Original Paper


The far north of Ontario, Canada, is a region that is very vulnerable to future change due to climate warming and resource extraction. Despite its vast size (~ 450,000 km2) and large numbers of lakes (> 700,000), there has been very little study of aquatic ecosystems in this remote area. To address this lack of limnological data, forty-one northern Ontario lakes spanning two physiographic regions, the Hudson Bay Lowlands and the Canadian Shield, were sampled during 2012 for crustacean zooplankton and water chemistry. These sub-Arctic lakes support diverse crustacean plankton communities with species richness similar to the richness of lakes in central and northeastern Ontario. While some of the species collected appear to be at the northern limit of their distributions, most relatively common Ontario species occurred throughout the 2012 study area. The physico-chemical characteristics showing relationships with species richness and relative abundances were variables associated with lake morphometry, ionic strength and nutrient status. There were differences in community richness and composition between Lowlands and Shield lakes; however, these differences do not seem attributable to biogeographical influences on species occurrences. Rather, the lower species richness and differences in community composition in Lowlands lakes relative to Shield lakes appear to be largely related to lake morphometry. The shallower and generally smaller Lowlands lakes provide much less habitat diversity, i.e. niche space, than the larger, deeper Shield lakes, leading to simpler communities.


Crustacean zooplankton Lakes Hudson Bay Lowlands Canadian Shield 



These studies were completed with the support of: the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change through the Climate Change and Multiple Stressor Aquatic Research Program at Laurentian University; the Wildlife Conservation Society through the Garfield Weston Foundation; and NSERC through the Canadian Network for Aquatic Ecosystem Services. Adam Jeziorski, Kathryn Hargan, and Chantal Sarrazin-Delay provided valuable assistance in the field, Lynne Witty identified the zooplankton, and Xavier Sagutch helped with survey planning. We thank Kim Armstrong and Jeff Amos for access to the BSM chemistry data and zooplankton samples. We are grateful for all the assistance provided by the Eabametoong First Nation at Fort Hope during the 2012 survey.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Brooks JL (1957) The systematics of North American Daphnia. Mem Conn Acad Arts Sci 13:1–180Google Scholar
  2. Brooks JL (1959) Cladocera. In: Edmondson WT (ed) Freshwater Biology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 587–656Google Scholar
  3. Chapman MG, Underwood AJ (1999) Ecological patterns in multivariate assemblages: information and interpretation of negative values in ANOSIM tests. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 180:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Colbourne JK, Hebert PDN (1996) The systematics of North American Daphnia (Crustacea: Anomopoda): a molecular phylogenic approach. Trans R Soc Lond 351:349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colombo SJ, McKenney DW, Lawrence KM, Gray PA (2007) Climate change projections for Ontario: practical information for policymakers and planners. Climate change research report CCRR-05. Applied Research and Development Branch—Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. p. 37Google Scholar
  6. Demelo R, Hebert PDN (1994) A taxanomic re-evaluation of North American Bosminidae. Can J Zool 72:1808–1825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeMott WR, Kerfoot WC (1982) Competition among cladocerans: nature of the interaction between Bosmina and Daphnia. Ecology 63:1949–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dodson SI (1981) Morphological variation of Daphnia pulex Leydig (Crustacea: Cladocera) and related species from North America. Hydrobiologia 83:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dussart BH, Fernando CH (1990) A review of the taxonomy of five Ontario genera of freshwater cyclopoid Copepoda (Crustacea). Can J Zool 68:2594–2604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hebert PDN (1995) The Daphnia of North America—an illustrated fauna. CD–ROM and website ( University of Guelph
  11. Hebert PDN, Finston TL (1997) A taxonomic re-evaluation of North American Daphnia (Crustacea: Cladocera) the D. catawba complex. Can J Zool 75:1254–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hebert PDN, Hann BJ (1986) Patterns in the composition of Arctic tundra pond microcustacean communities. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:1416–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hessen DO, Faafeng BA, Smith VH, Bakkestuen V, Walseng B (2006) Extrinsic and intrinsic controls of zooplankton diversity in lakes. Ecology 87:433–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hjartarson J, McGuinty L, Boutileir S, Majernikova E (2014) Beneath the surface: uncovering the economic potential of Ontario’s Ring of Fire. Ontario Chamber of Commerce Report. ISBN 978-1-928052-01-2Google Scholar
  15. Jeppesen E, Nõges P, Davidson T, Haberman J, Nõges T, Blank K, Lauridsen TL, Søndergaard M, Saye C, Laugaste R, Johansson LS, Bjerring R, Amsinck SL (2011) Zooplankton as indicators in lakes: a scientific-based plea for including zooplankton in the ecological quality assessment of lakes according to the European Water Framework Directive (WFD). Hydrobiologia 676:279–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jeziorski A, Yan ND, Paterson AM, DeSellas AM, Turner MA, Jeffries DS, Keller W, Weeber RC, McNicol DK, Palmer ME, McIver K, Arseneau K, Ginn BK, Cumming BF, Smol JP (2008) The widespread threat of calcium decline in fresh waters. Science 322:1374–1377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeziorski A, Keller B, Dyer RD, Paterson AM, Smol JP (2015) Differences among modern-day and historical cladoceran communities from the “Ring of Fire” lake region of northern Ontario: identifying responses to climate warming. Fund Appl Limnol 186:203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keller W, Conlon M (1994) Crustacean zooplankton communities and lake morphometry in Precambrian Shield lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 51:2424–2434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keller W, Pitblado JR (1984) Crustacean plankton in northeastern Ontario lakes subjected to acid deposition. Water Air Soil Poll 23:271–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keller W, Pitblado JR (1989) The distribution of crustacean zooplankton in northern Ontario, Canada. J Biogeogr 16:249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keller W, Yan ND (1998) Biological recovery from lake acidification: zooplankton communities as a model of patterns and processes. Restor Ecol 6:364–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keller W, Yan ND, Howell T, Molot LA, Taylor WD (1992) Changes in zooplankton during the experimental neutralization and early reacidification of Bowland Lake near Sudbury, Ontario. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:52–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keller W, Yan ND, Somers KM, Heneberry JH (2002) Crustacean zooplankton communities in lakes recovering from acidification. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:726–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Korinek V (1981) Diaphanosoma birgei n. sp. (Crustacea, Cladocera). A new species from America and its widely distributed subspecies Diaphanosoma birgei ssp. lacustris n. ssp. Can J Zool 59:1115–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Korinek V, Sacherova V, Havel L (1997) Subgeneric diffrences in head shield and ephippia ultrastructure within the genus Bosmina Baird (Crustacea, Cladocera). Hydrobiologia 360:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leavitt PR, Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1989) Whole-Lake experiments: the annual record of fossil pigments and zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 34:700–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lepš J, Šmilauer P (2003) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  29. MacLeod J, Keller W, Paterson AM, Dyer RD, Gunn JM (2017) Scale and watershed features determine lake chemistry patterns across physiographic regions in the far north of Ontario, Canada. J Limnol 76:211–220Google Scholar
  30. MacPhee S, Arnott SE, Keller W (2011) Lake thermal structure influences macroinvertebrate predation on crustacean zooplankton. J Plankton Res 33:1586–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MOEE (1983) Handbook of analytical methods for environmental samples. Laboratory Services Branch, Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy. Queen’s Printer, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  32. Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1996) Invertebrate morphospecies as surrogates for species: a case study. Conserv Biol 10:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palmer ME, Yan ND (2013) Decadal-scale regional changes in Canadian freshwater zooplankton: the likely consequence of complex interactions among multiple anthropogenic stressors. Freshw Biol 58:1366–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paterson AM, Keller (Bill) W, Rühland KM, Jones FC, Winter JG (2014) An exploratory survey of summer water chemistry and plankton communities in lakes near the Sutton River, Hudson Bay Lowlands, Ontario, Canada. Arct Antarct Alp Res 46:121–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pinel-Alloul B, Methot G, Verraeult G, Vigneault Y (1990) Zooplankton species associations in Quebec lakes: variation with abiotic factors, including natural and anthropogenic acidification. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:110–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pinel-Alloul B, André A, Legendre P, Cardille JA, Patalas K, Salki A (2013) Large-scale geographic patterns of diversity and community structure of pelagic crustacean zooplankton in Canadian lakes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:784–795. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rowe CL (2000) Global distribution, phylogeny and taxonomy of the freshwater zooplankton genus Holopedium. M.Sc. Thesis, University of GuelphGoogle Scholar
  38. Rühland KM, Paterson AM, Keller W, Michelutti N, Smol JP (2013) Global warming triggers the loss of a key Arctic refugium. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 280:20131887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith K, Fernando CH (1978) A guide to the freshwater calanoid and cyclopoid copepod Crustacea of Ontario. University of Waterloo. Department of Biology. Ser. No. 18Google Scholar
  40. Sprules WG (1977) Crustacean zooplankton communities as indicators of limnological conditions: an approach using principal component analysis. J Fish Res Board Can 34:962–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Swadling KM, Gibson JAE, Pienitz R, Vincent WF (2001) Biogeography of copepods in lakes and ponds of sub-Arctic Quebec. Hydrobiologia 453(454):341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Symons CC, Pedruski MT, Arnott SE, Sweetman JN (2014) Spatial, environmental, and biotic determinants of zooplankton community composition in sub-Arctic lakes and ponds in Wapusk National Park, Canada. Arct Antarct Alp Res 46:159–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor DJ, Ishikane CR, Haney RA (2002) The systematics of Holarctic bosminids and a revision that reconciles molecular and morphological evolution. Limnol Oceanogr 47:1486–1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tessier AJ, Horwitz RJ (1990) Influence of water chemistry on size structure of zooplankton assemblages. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:1937–1943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thorp JH, Covich AP (eds) (1991) Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic Press Inc, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  46. Valois A, Keller W, Ramcharan C (2010) Abiotic and biotic processes in lakes recovering from acidification: the relative roles of metal toxicity and fish predation as barriers to zooplankton re-establishment. Freshw Biol 55:2585–2597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Webster NI, Keller W, Ramcharan CW (2013) Restoration of zooplankton communities in industrially damaged lakes: influences of residual metal contamination and the recovery of fish communities. Restor Ecol 21:785–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson MS (1959) Calanoida. In: Edmondson WT (ed) Freshwater Biology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 738–975Google Scholar
  49. Yan ND, Keller W, MacIsaac HJ, McEachern LJ (1991) Regulation of zooplankton community structure of an acidified lake by Chaoborus. Ecol Appl 1:52–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Yan ND, Keller W, Somers KM, Pawson TW, Girard RE (1996) Recovery of crustacean zooplankton communities from acid and metal contamination: comparing manipulated and reference lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:1301–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yan ND, Somers KM, Girard RE, Paterson AM, Keller B, Ramcharan CW, Rusak JA, Ingram R, Morgan GE, Gunn JM (2008) Long-term trends in zooplankton of Dorset, Ontario, lakes: the probable interactive effects of changes in pH, total phosphorus, dissolved organic carbon, and predators. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65:862–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yeatman HC (1959) Cyclopoida. In: Edmonson WT (ed) Freshwater Biology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 796–814Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cooperative Freshwater Ecology Unit, Vale Living with Lakes CentreLaurentian UniversitySudburyCanada
  2. 2.Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, Dorset Environmental Science CentreDorsetCanada

Personalised recommendations