Polar Biology

, Volume 41, Issue 6, pp 1143–1155 | Cite as

Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions

  • I. ParnikozaEmail author
  • A. Rozhok
  • P. Convey
  • M. Veselski
  • J. Esefeld
  • R. Ochyra
  • O. Mustafa
  • C. Braun
  • H.-U. Peter
  • J. Smykla
  • V. Kunakh
  • I. Kozeretska
Original Paper


In the present paper, we compare how the kelp gull, Larus dominicanus, utilizes various nest building materials, particularly vascular plants, bryophytes, lichens and other components, in the Fildes Peninsula area (King George Island) and on the Argentine Islands area. In both areas, nest material primarily consisted of the Antarctic hairgrass (Deschampsia antarctica), bryophytes, lichens, feathers, limpets, and algae. Our study reveals area-specific differences in the utilization of plants for nest building related to local conditions during the nesting season. In the Fildes area, vegetation emerges from under the winter snow cover earlier in the spring, giving the gulls greater choice locally, meaning that the gulls need not resort to long distance material transfer. Here, mosses and lichens dominate in the nest material, likely collected from the nearby vegetation formations. The Antarctic hairgrass in these conditions is mostly found in nests located directly within hairgrass formations. However, on the more southern Argentine Islands, kelp gulls routinely use D. antarctica and some mosses, transferring them from coastal hill tops where snow generally disappears earlier. Here, the gulls appear to be selective still, as they rarely use some mosses, such as Polytrichum strictum, that are abundant near the nesting locations. In the Argentine Islands area, we documented long-range transfer of the Antarctic hairgrass and some other vegetation materials from places of abundance to bare rocks of low islands lacking developed vegetation. This demonstrates the potential of the gulls to serve as dispersal and gene pool exchange agents for the local terrestrial biota in the maritime Antarctic, especially between highly isolated populations from small islands and ice-free areas.


Vegetation Larus dominicanus Deschampsia antarctica Colobanthus quitensis King George Island Fildes Peninsula Argentine Islands 



The fieldwork was supported by the State Institution National Antarctic Scientific Center, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine during the the 18th and 20th Ukrainian Antarctic expeditions. We thank I. Dyyky, D. Pilipenko, V. Smagol, P. Khoetsky, V. Omelyanovich, O. Salgansky, A. Dzhulai, V. Papitashvili, Z. Yu., D. Beilman for help in expedition preparation and sample collection. This study was carried out as part of the State Priority Scientific and Technical Research Program in the Antarctic during 2011–2020 within the NASU and PAS joint 2015–2017 project “Adaptive strategies of mutual survival of organisms in extreme environments.” J. Smykla was supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education within the program “Supporting International Mobility of Scientists” and grant no. NN305376438. P. Convey was supported by NERC core funding to the British Antarctic Survey’s ‘Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation’ and R. Ochyra gained financial support through the statutory fund of the W. Szafer Institute of Botany of the Polish Academy of Sciences. This paper also contributes to the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research ‘State of the Antarctic Ecosystem’ international research program. We thank the Editor and anonymous referees for constructive comments on an earlier version.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

This study was not accompanied by the emergence of potential conflicts of interest and did not include Human Participants or Animals.

Supplementary material

300_2018_2274_MOESM1_ESM.doc (42 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 42 kb)


  1. Barsch D, Blümel W-D, Flügel W-A, Mäusbacher R, Stäblein G, Zick W (1985) Untersuchungen zum Periglazial auf der König-Georg-Insel Südshetlandinseln/Antarctica. Ber Polarforsch 24:75Google Scholar
  2. Burger J, Gochfield M (1981) Nest site selection by kelp gulls in southern Africa. Condor 83:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Data of British Antarctic Service at Cambridge. Accessed 03 March 2017
  4. de Albuquerque MP, de Carvalho VF, Schünemann AL, Putzke J, Gunski RJ, Seibert S, Petry MV, Pereira AB (2012) Plant composition of skuas nests at Hennequin Point, King George Island, Antarctica. Am J Plant Sci 3:688–692. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fowbert JA, Smith RIL (1994) Rapid population increases in native vascular plants in the Argentine Islands, Antarctic Peninsula. Arct Alp Res 26:290–296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Furmańczyk K, Ochyra R (1982) Plant communities of the Admiralty Bay region (King George Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctic) I. Jasnorzewski Gardens. Pol Polar Res 3:25–39Google Scholar
  7. Govoruha LS (1997) Glaciographic and glacioclimatologic characteristics of the Pacific shores of Graham Land. Bull Ukrainian Antar Center 1:60–66Google Scholar
  8. Gozhyk PF, Greku RKH, Usenko VP, Vernigorov VP, Greku TR, Ostrecov GA, Gonchar AI, Klochan YA, Moc VN (2002) A map of the bottom relief of the shallow zone of the Argentine Islands Archipelago in the vicinity of the Ukrainian Antarctic station “Akademik Vernadsky”. Geolog Zhurn 1:128–131Google Scholar
  9. Gremmen NJM, Huiskes AHL, Francke JW (1994) Epilithic macrolichen vegetataion of the Argentine Islands, Antarctic Peninsula. Antarct Sci 6:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hołdyński C, Loro PM, Pisarek W (2003) Wind dispersal of Deschampsia antarctica diaspores at the vicinity of the Arctowski polar station. 29th Intern. Polar symposium: the functioning of polar ecosystems as viewed against global environmental changes. Kraków, pp 57–60Google Scholar
  11. Hughes K, Ott S, Bölter M, Convey P (2006) Colonisation processes. Trends in Antarctic terrestrial and limnetic ecosystems. In: Bergstrom DM, Convey P, Huiskes A (eds) Antarctica as a global indicator. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  12. Lindsay DC (1971) Vegetation of the South Shetland Islands. Br Antarct Surv Bull 25:59–83Google Scholar
  13. Martazinova VF, Timofeyev VE, Ivanova EK (2010) Present-day regional climate of the Antarctic Peninsula and Academic Vernadsky station. UAJ 9:231–248Google Scholar
  14. Ochyra R (1998) The moss flora of King George Island, Antarctica. Polish Academy of Sciences, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, KrakówGoogle Scholar
  15. Ochyra R, Smith RIL, Bednarek-Ochyra H (2008) The illustrated moss flora of Antarctica. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Øvstedal DO, Smith RIL (2001) Lichens of Antarctica and South Georgia: a guide to their identification. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Ozheredova IP, Parnikoza IYu, Poronnik OO, Kozeretska IA, Demidov SV, Kunakh VA (2015) Mechanisms of Antarctic vascular plant adaptation to abiotic environmental factors. Cytol Genet 2:139–145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Parnikoza IYu, Maidanuk DN, Kozeretska IA (2007) Are Deschampsia antarctica Desv. and Colobanthus quitensis (Kunth) Bartl. migratory relicts? Cytol Genet 4:36–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parnikoza I, Kozeretska O, Kozeretska I (2009a) Is a translocation of indigenous plant material successful in the Maritime Antarctic? Polarforschung 78:25–27Google Scholar
  20. Parnikoza I, Convey P, Dykyy I, Trokhymets V, Milinevsky G, Inozemtseva D, Kozeretska I (2009b) Current status of the Antarctic herb tundra formation in the central Argentine Islands. Global Change Biol 15:1685–1693. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parnikoza I, Dykyy I, Ivanets V, Kozeretska I, Kunakh V, Rozhok A, Ochyra R, Convey P (2012) Use of Deschampsia antarctica for nest building by the kelp gull in the Argentine Island area (maritime Antarctica) and its possible role in plant dispersal. Polar Biol 11:1753–1758. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parnikoza IY, Abakumov EV, Dykyy IV, Pilipenko DV, Shvydun PP, Kozeretska IA, Kunakh VA (2014) Influence of birds on the spatial distribution of Deschampsia antarctica (Desv.) on Galindez Island (Argentine Islands, maritime Antarctic). Russ Ornithol J 23:3095–3107Google Scholar
  23. Parnikoza IYu, Abakumov EV, Dykyy IV, Pilipenko DV, Shvydun PP, Kozeretska IA, Kunakh VA (2015a) Influence of birds on the spatial distribution of Deschampsia antarctica E. Desv. on Galindez Island (Argentine Islands, maritime Antarctic). Vest Sankt-Peterburg. Univ. 1:78–97Google Scholar
  24. Parnikoza I, Hadwiczak M, Barcikowski M, Stempniewicz L (2015b) Arctic and Antarctic large white-headed gull species nest materials—similarity across the globe. 26th International Congress on Polar Research: High latitudes and high mountains: driver of or driven by global change? German Society for Polar Research, Munich, pp 117–118Google Scholar
  25. Parnikoza I, Miryuta N, Ozheredova I, Kozeretska I, Smykla J, Kunakh V, Convey P (2015c) Comparative analysis of Deschampsia antarctica Desv. population adaptability in the natural environment of the Admiralty Bay region (King George Island, maritime Antarctic). Polar Biol 38:1401–1411. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parnikoza I, Abakumov E, Korsun S, Klymenko I, Netsyk M, Kudinova A, Kozeretska I (2016) Soils of the Argentine Islands, Antarctica: diversity and characteristics. Polarforschung 86:83–96. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peklo AM (2007) The birds of Argentine Islands and Petermann Island. Mineral Publishers, Kryvyy RihGoogle Scholar
  28. Peter H-U, Buesser C, Mustafa O, Pfeiffer S (2008) Risk assessment for the Fildes Peninsula and Ardley Island, and development of management plans for their designation as Specially Protected or Specially Managed Areas. Federal Environment Agency Dessau-Rosslau, May 2008 Accessed 03 March 2017
  29. Quintana RD, Cirelli V, Benitez O (2001) Nest materials of skuas (Catharacta spp.) and kelp gulls (Larus dominicanus) at Cierva Point. Antarctic Peninsula. Notornis 48:235–241Google Scholar
  30. Smith RIL, Corner RWM (1973) Vegetation of the Arthur Harbour—Argentine Islands region of the Antarctic Peninsula. Br Antarct Surv Bull 33–34:89–122Google Scholar
  31. Yorio P, Borboroglu P (2002) Breeding biology of kelp gulls (Larus dominicanus) at Golfo San Jorge, Patagonia, Argentina. Emu 102:257–263. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics of National Academy of Science of UkraineKyivUkraine
  2. 2.State Institution National Antarctic Scientific Center, Ministry of Education and Science of UkraineKyivUkraine
  3. 3.University of Colorado DenverDenverUSA
  4. 4.British Antarctic Survey, NERCCambridgeUK
  5. 5.Zhytomir Regional MuseumZytomyrUkraine
  6. 6.Institute of Ecology and EvolutionUniversity of JenaJenaGermany
  7. 7.W. Szafer Institute of BotanyPolish Academy of SciencesKrakówPoland
  8. 8.Thuringian Institute of Sustainability and Climate ProtectionJenaGermany
  9. 9.Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of SciencesKrakówPoland
  10. 10.Taras Shevchenko National University of KyivKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations