Advertisement

Polar Biology

, Volume 41, Issue 6, pp 1133–1142 | Cite as

First records of testate amoebae from the Novaya Zemlya archipelago (Russian Arctic)

  • Yuri A. Mazei
  • Andrey N. Tsyganov
  • Viktor A. Chernyshov
  • Alexander A. Ivanovsky
  • Richard J. PayneEmail author
Original Paper
  • 137 Downloads

Abstract

Testate amoebae have proved a useful group of species to understand the biogeography of larger microorganisms. The Arctic has attracted particular interest in such studies but there are large geographic gaps in current knowledge. Here we present what we believe is the first ever study of testate amoebae from the Novaya Zemlya archipelago in Arctic Russia. We investigated testate amoebae from the northernmost island of Novaya Zemlya proper and two smaller islands to the south: Dolgii Island and Matveev Island. We found that testate amoebae were present and active even in the extreme physical environment of northern Novaya Zemlya. Further south in the tundra zone of Dolgii and Matveev islands, testate amoebae were notably abundant and diverse. There were distinct differences in assemblage between all three islands and particularly between Novaya Zemlya and the two more southerly islands. The assemblage of Novaya Zemlya was distinctive with a surprising abundance of larger taxa. Comparisons to previous data suggest that the testate amoeba assemblages of these islands may show more affinity to those further west in Greenland and Svalbard than those further east in Siberia. Results highlight the limited knowledge of the abundance and diversity of these functionally significant protists in large areas of the globe.

Keywords

Protist Biogeography Arctic Protozoa 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Analysis and publication of data was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Grant 14-14-00891 to YuM and Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Grant 16-04-00803 to AT. UK-Russia research cooperation was supported by a Royal Society International Exchange Grant to RJP (IE150173).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Andreev A, Lubinski D, Bobrov A, Ingólfsson Ó, Forman S, Tarasov P, Möller P (2008) Early Holocene environments on October Revolution Island, Severnaya Zemlya, Arctic Russia. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 267:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azovsky A, Mazei Y (2013) Do microbes have macroecology? Large-scale patterns in the diversity and distribution of marine benthic ciliates. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azovsky AI, Tikhonenkov DV, Mazei YA (2016) An estimation of the global diversity and distribution of the smallest eukaryotes: biogeography of marine benthic heterotrophic flagellates. Protist 167:411–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamforth SS (2004) Water film fauna of microbiotic crusts of a warm desert. J Arid Environ 56:413–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bamforth SS (2008) Protozoa of biological soil crusts of a cool desert in Utah. J Arid Environ 72:722–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beyens L, Bobrov A (2016) Evidence supporting the concept of a regionalized distribution of testate amoebae in the Arctic. Acta Protozool 55:197–209Google Scholar
  7. Beyens L, Chardez D (1995) An annotated list of testate amoebae observed in the Arctic between the longitudes 27E and 168W. Arch Protistenk 146:219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beyens L, Chardez D, De Landtsheer R, De Baere D (1986a) Testate amoebae communities from aquatic habitats in the Arctic. Polar Biol 6:197–205.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00443396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beyens L, Chardez D, De Landtsheer R, De Bock P, Jacques E (1986b) Testate amoebae populations from moss and lichen habitats in the Arctic. Polar Biol 5:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beyens L, Chardez D, Van de Vijver B (2000) A contribution to the protist-diversity in the polar regions: testate amoebae data from the Russian Arctic. In: Ceulemans R, Bogaert J, Deckmyn G, Nijs I (eds) Topics in ecology: structure and function in plants and ecosystems. Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen, Antwerp, pp 101–110Google Scholar
  11. Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:325–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J (2004) Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85:2717–2727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coulson S et al (2014) The terrestrial and freshwater invertebrate biodiversity of the archipelagoes of the Barents Sea; Svalbard, Franz Josef Land and Novaya Zemlya. Soil Biol Biochem 68:440–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Wit R, Bouvier T (2006) ‘Everything is everywhere, but, the environment selects’; what did Baas Becking and Beijerinck really say? Environm Microbiol 8:755–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flint M, Zatsepin A, Kucheruk N, Poyarkov S, Rimskii-Korsakov N (2008) Multidisciplinary studies of the ecosystem of the Kara Sea: Cruise 54 of R/V Akademik Mstislav Keldysh. Oceanology 48:883–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forman SL, Lubinski DJ, Zeeberg JJ, Polyak L, Miller GH, Matishov G, Tarasov G (1999) Postglacial emergence and late Quaternary glaciation on northern Novaya Zemlya, Arctic Russia. Boreas 28:133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forman S, Lubinski D, Ingólfsson Ó, Zeeberg J, Snyder J, Siegert M, Matishov G (2004) A review of postglacial emergence on Svalbard, Franz Josef Land and Novaya Zemlya, northern Eurasia. Quat Sci Rev 23:1391–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fournier B, Malysheva E, Mazei Y, Moretti M, Mitchell EAD (2012) Toward the use of testate amoeba functional traits as indicator of floodplain restoration success. Eur J Soil Biol 49:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hammer Ø, Harper D, Ryan P (2001) PAST-palaeontological statistics, ver. 1.89. Palaeontologia Electronica 4Google Scholar
  20. Heger T et al (2011) Rediscovery of Nebela ansata (Amoebozoa: Arcellinida) in eastern North America: biogeographical implications. J Biogeogr 38:1897–1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hodkinson ID et al. (2013) Terrestrial and freshwater invertebrates. In: Meltoft H (ed) Arctic biodiversity assessment. Status and trends in arctic biodiversity. CAFF, pp 195–233Google Scholar
  22. Jiang J-G (2006) Development of a new biotic index to assess freshwater pollution. Environ Pollut 139:306–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kosakyan A, Heger TJ, Leander BS, Todorov M, Mitchell EAD, Lara E (2012) COI barcoding of nebelid testate amoebae (Amoebozoa: Arcellinida): extensive cryptic diversity and redefinition of the Hyalospheniidae schultze. Protist 163:415–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lara E, Roussel-Delif L, Fournier B, Wilkinson DM, Mitchell EA (2015) Soil microorganisms behave like macroscopic organisms: patterns in the global distribution of soil euglyphid testate amoebae. J Biogeogr 43:520–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Makkaveev P, Polukhin A, Khlebopashev P (2013) The surface runoff of nutrients from the coasts of Blagopoluchiya bay of the Novaya Zemlya Archipelago. Oceanology 53:539–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martiny JBH et al (2006) Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:102–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mazei YA, Chernyshov V (2011) Testate amoebae communities in the southern tundra and forest-tundra of Western Siberia. Biol Bull 38:789–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mazei Y, Tsyganov AN (2006) Freshwater testate amoebae. KMK, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  29. Mazei Y, Chernyshov V, Tsyganov AN, Payne RJ (2015) Testing the effect of refrigerated storage on testate amoeba samples. Microb Ecol 70:861–864CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitchell EAD, Charman DJ, Warner BG (2008) Testate amoebae analysis in ecological and paleoecological studies of wetlands: past, present and future. Biodivers Conserv 17:2115–2137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. NOAA (2017) Malye Karmakuly climate data. NOAA. ftp://ftp.atdd.noaa.gov/pub/GCOS/WMO-Normals/TABLES/REG_II/RA/20744.TXT. Accessed Sept 2017
  32. Payne RJ (2013) Seven reasons why protists make useful bioindicators. Acta Protozool 52:105–113Google Scholar
  33. Payne RJ, Mitchell EAD (2009) How many is enough? Determining optimal count totals for ecological and palaeoecological studies of testate amoebae. J Paleolimnol 42:483–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith HG, Bobrov A, Lara E (2008) Diversity and biogeography of testate amoebae. Biodivers Conserv 17:329–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stepanova S, Nedospasov A (2017) Features of hydrophysical and hydrochemical conditions in Blagopoluchiya Bay (Novaya Zemlya Archipelago). Oceanology 57:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tikhonenkov DV, Mazei YA (2006) Heterotrophic flagellates from freshwater biotopes of Matveev and Dolgii Islands (the Pechora Sea). Protistology 4:327–337Google Scholar
  37. Trappeniers K, van Kerckvoorde A, Chardez D, Nijs I, Beyens L (1999) Ecology of testate amoebae communities from aquatic habitats in the Zackenberg area (Northeast Greenland). Polar Biol 22:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Udalov A, Vedenin A, Simakov M (2016) Benthic fauna of Blagopoluchiya Bay (Novaya Zemlya Archipelago, Kara Sea). Oceanology 56:655–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van Bellen S et al (2017) An alternative approach to transfer functions? Testing the performance of a functional trait-based model for testate amoebae. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 468:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeeberg J (2002) Climate and glacial history of the Novaya Zemlya Archipelago, Russian Arctic: with notes on the Region’s history of exploration. Rozenberg, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuri A. Mazei
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andrey N. Tsyganov
    • 1
  • Viktor A. Chernyshov
    • 1
  • Alexander A. Ivanovsky
    • 2
  • Richard J. Payne
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Penza State UniversityPenzaRussia
  2. 2.Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  3. 3.University of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations