Abstract
Many contributions try to emphasize the similarities and differences between the Brown Skua Catharacta antarctica lonnbergi¸ and the South Polar Skua Catharacta maccormicki. Most of the morphological information of these species is based on field observation and referred to their external appearance. Few studies deal with their morphometry, mostly using characters measured in live birds, but the information about skeletal features is scarce. In the present study, skull differences between the Brown Skua and the South Polar Skua are quantified through independent quantitative analyses. Shape differences were evaluated in a geometric morphometrics test, while linear metric parameters were used to analyze the differences between species in a principal component analysis, and finally, in a discriminant test. Geometric morphometrics analysis cannot separate groups, whereas linear morphometrics divide well two different groups, showing significant differences. Notwithstanding, the most significant result was obtained using the discriminant analysis, which differentiates the species using simple equations which contain combined measures that can be easily obtained.
References
Acosta Hospitaleche CI, Montalti D, Marti LJ (2009) Skeletal morphoanatomy of the Brown Skua Stercorarius antarcticus lonnbergi and the South Polar Skua Stercorarius maccormicki. Polar Biol 32:759–774
Baumel J, Witmer L (1993) Osteologia. In: Cambridge M (ed) Handbook of Avian anatomy. Nomina anatomica Avium. Nuttall Ornithological Club, Cambridge, pp 45–132
Bookstein FL (1996) Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bull Math Biol 58:313–365
Devillers P (1978) Distribution and relationships of South American skuas. Le Gerfaut 68:374–417
Furness R (1987) The Skuas. Poyser, Calton
Graña Grilli M, Libertelli M, Montalti D (2011) Diet of South Polar Skua chicks in two areas of sympatry with Brown Skua. Waterbirds 34:495–498
Grilli MG, Montalti D (2012) Trophic interactions between brown and south polar skuas at Deception Island, Antarctica. Polar Biol 35:299–304
Hahn S, Reinhardt K, Ritz MS, Janicke T, Montalti D, Peter H-U (2007) Oceanographic and climatic factors differentially affect reproduction performance of Antarctic skuas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 334:287–297
Jolliffe IT (1986) Graphical representation of data using principal components. In: Principal component analysis. Springer, New York, pp 64–91
Mitteroecker P, Gunz P (2009) Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol Biol 36:235–247
Montalti D (2005) Morphology and reproductive biology of the species of genus Catharacta (Aves, Stercorariidae) of Antarctica. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata
Montalti D, Casaux R, Coria N, Soave G, Grilli MG (2009) The importance of fish in the diet of the south polar skua (Stercorarius maccormicki) at the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Emu 109:305–309
Peter HU, Kaiser M, Gebauer A (1990) Ecological and morphological investigations on south polar skuas (Catharacta maccormicki) and brown skuas (Catharacta skua lonnbergi) on Fildes Peninsula, King George Island, South Shetland Islands. Zool Jb Syst Jena 117:201–218
Reinhardt K, Blechschmidt K, Peter H-U, Montalti D (1997) A hitherto unknown hybridization between Chilean and South Polar skua. Polar Biol 17:114–118
Ritz MS, Millar C, Miller GD, Phillips RA, Ryan P, Sternkopf V, Liebers-Helbig D, Peter H-U (2008) Phylogeography of the southern skua complex—rapid colonization of the southern hemisphere during a glacial period and reticulate evolution. Mol Phylogenet Evol 49:292–303
Rohlf FJ (1996) Morphometric spaces, shape components and the effects of linear transformations. NATO ASI series. Series A 284:117–130
Rohlf FJ (2005) tpsDig. Digitize landmarks and outlines, version 2.04., vol 39. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman and Co., New York
Zar JH (1974) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, London
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by funding from the Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), Instituto Antártico Argentino (IAA) and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). The authors are grateful to the Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo from the Universidad Nacional de la Plata for the scholarship awarded for this study. Special thanks to Dr. Alejandra Matarrese for language checking of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kass, N., Montalti, D. & Acosta Hospitaleche, C. Comparison of the skull of Brown Skua (Catharacta antarctica lonnbergi) and South Polar Skua (Catharacta maccormicki): differentiation source identification and discriminant analysis. Polar Biol 41, 1049–1053 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2268-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2268-7