Oocyte size distribution reveals ovary development strategy, number and relative size of egg batches in lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus)
- 265 Downloads
The reproductive biology of fishes impact many other components of their life history, and can influence their vulnerability to fisheries, therefore for more informed management, a good understanding is essential. For lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus), a semi-pelagic species found across the north-Atlantic and targeted by fishers for their roe, comprehensive knowledge of this aspect of their life history is still lacking. Through a combination of regular sampling from scientific surveys and fisheries and modern methodology in fish reproductive biology, we investigated the ovary development of lumpfish throughout vitellogenesis. The results showed that ovaries of lumpfish had a wide range of oocyte sizes and that lumpfish are a determinate, batch spawner with ovary development taking at least 8 months. They spawn a maximum of two batches per season with a similar number of eggs in each batch. Unusually for a determinate batch spawner, the two batches were easily distinguished within the ovary prior to ovulation. Average egg size ranged from between 2050 and 2500 µm, with larger fish having larger eggs, and the egg diameter of the second batch being on average 1.6% smaller than the first. Lumpfish were documented as spawning over a 4-month period, but it is likely that spawning occurs over a greater period. A macroscopic and oocyte size frequency distribution (OSFD) scale for lumpfish is presented which can be used for future studies of lumpfish.
KeywordsLumpsucker Maturation Oocyte Ovary development Roe fishery
The author would like to thank all the crew and scientific personnel on the scientific surveys who collected the ovary samples. Halldór G. Ólafsson’s assistance in many logistical aspects was invaluable. I would also like to thank the fishermen who supplied us with fish and 3 anonymous referees who took the time to critically read and comment on the article. Appreciation goes to Linda Kristjánsdóttir and Herdís Steinsdóttir who assisted with the laboratory work, Jacob M. Kasper who captured the image of the immature lumpfish, and to Anders Thorsen who assisted with setting up the image analysis software. This work was funded by the Marine and Freshwater Research Institute and Biopol.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
- Bentley KT, Schindler DE, Cline TJ, Armstrong JB, Macias D, Ciepiela LR, Hilborn R (2014) Predator avoidance during reproduction: diel movements by spawning sockeye salmon between stream and lake habitats. J Anim Ecol 83:1478–1489. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12223 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buckley LJ, Smigielski AS, Halavik TA, Caldarone EM, Burns BR, Laurence GC (1991) Winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus reproductive success. II. Effects of spawning time and female size on size, composition and viability of eggs and larvae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 74:125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ehrenbaum E (1904) Eier und larven von fischen der deutschen bucht. III. Fische mit festsitzenden eiern. Wiss Meeresunters 6:127–200Google Scholar
- Everson I (1994) Timescale of ovarian maturation in Notothenia coriiceps; evidence for a prolonged adolescent phase. J Fish Biol 44:997–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1994.tb01271.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fulton TW (1907) On the spawning of the lumpsucker (Cyclopterus lumpus) and the paternal guardianship of the eggs. Annu Rep Fish Board Scotl 3:169–178Google Scholar
- Gregory RS, Daborn GR (1982) Notes on adult lumpfish Cyclopterus lumpus L. from the Bay of Fundy. Proc Nov Scotian Inst Sci 32:321–326Google Scholar
- Hinckley S (1990) Variation of egg size of walleye pollock Theragra chalcogramma with a preliminary examination of the effect of egg size on larval size. Fish Bull 88:471–483Google Scholar
- ICES (2017) Report of the Working Group on Widely Distributed Stocks (WGWIDE), 30 August -5 September 2017, ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2017/ACOM:23. 1111 ppGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy J, Gundersen AC, Høines Å, Kjesbu OS (2011) Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) spawn annually but successive cohorts of oocytes develop over 2 years, complicating correct assessment of maturity. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 68:201–209. https://doi.org/10.1139/F10-149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy J, Jónsson SÞ, Ólafsson HG, Kasper JM (2016) Observations of vertical movements and depth distribution of migrating female lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) in Iceland from data storage tags and trawl surveys. ICES J Mar Sci 73:1160–1169. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kjesbu OS (1994) Time of start of spawning in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) females in relation to vitellogenic oocyte diameter, temperature, fish length and condition. J Fish Biol 45:719–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1994.tb00939.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Korta M, Murua H, Kurita Y, Kjesbu OS (2010) How are the oocytes recruited in an indeterminate fish? Applications of stereological techniques along with advanced packing density theory on European hake (Merluccius merluccius L.). Fish Res 104:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2010.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marteinsdóttir G, Steinarsson A (1998) Maternal influence on the size and viability of Iceland cod Gadus morhua eggs and larvae. J Fish Biol 52:1241–1258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb00969.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nichol DG, Acuna EI (2001) Annual and batch fecundities of yellowfin sole, Limanda aspera, in the eastern Bering Sea. Fish Bull 99:108–122Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
- Russell FS (1976) The eggs and planktonic stages of British marine fishes. Academic Press Inc, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Witthames PR, Thorsen A, Murua H, Saborido-Rey F, Greenwood LN, Dominguen R, Korta M, Kjesbu OS (2009) Advances in methods for determining fecundity: application of the new methods to some marine fishes. Fish Bull 107:148–164Google Scholar