Advertisement

Polar Biology

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 935–943 | Cite as

Prokaryotic diversity in four microbial mats on the Fildes Peninsula, King George Island, maritime Antarctica

  • Cecilia Callejas
  • Gastón AzzizEmail author
  • Emanuel M. Souza
  • Paul R. Gill
  • Silvia Batista
Original Paper

Abstract

Most of Fildes Peninsula is ice-free during summer thereby allowing for formation of networks of creeks with meltwater from Collins Glacier and snowmelt. A variety of benthic microbial mats develop within these creeks. The composition of these microbial communities has not been studied in detail. In this report, clone libraries of bacterial and cyanobacterial 16S rRNA genes were used to describe the microbial community structure of four mats near a shoreline of Drake Passage. Samples were collected from four microbial mats, two at an early developmental stage (December) and two collected latter in late summer (April). Sequence analysis showed that filamentous Cyanobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Betaproteobacteria were the most abundant ribotypes. Diversity indices were comparable for the four mats. Bacterial libraries from mat samples collected in December represented primarily Alphaproteobacterial and Betaproteobacterial ribotypes. In contrast, filamentous Cyanobacteria as well as Alphaproteobacteria were most abundant in libraries derived from samples collected in April. Differences in relative abundances may reflect the succession of microbial communities during the austral summer. Composition of cyanobacterial orders in bacterial libraries obtained from mats collected in late summer were different compared with their corresponding cyanobacterial libraries. This may be the result of divergence in primer specificities. Nostocales, Oscillatoriales, and Synechococcales orders were the dominant ribotypes represented in cyanobacterial libraries. Some taxa of cyanobacteria identified using this strategy coincided with previous studies of others in the same region using microscopic techniques. Future work should combine microscopy, culture–dependent and culture–independent strategies to better describe microbial mats in maritime Antarctica.

Keywords

Microbial mat Maritime Antarctica 16S rRNA gene clone library Microbial diversity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by Instituto Antártico Uruguayo, ANII (Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación), AMSUD Pasteur and PEDECIBA-Biología (Programa de Ciencias Básicas).

Supplementary material

300_2018_2256_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)
300_2018_2256_MOESM2_ESM.jpg (252 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (JPEG 252 kb). Fig. S1 Rarefaction curves of bacteria (above) and cyanobacteria (below) by mothur using 97% cutoff. Filled circles represent m7 sample, empty circles represent m8 sample, filled triangles represent m15 sample in the bacteria chart and m16 in the cyanobacteria chart, empty triangles represent m16 sample in the bacteria chart and m15 in the cyanobacteria chart
300_2018_2256_MOESM3_ESM.jpg (84 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (JPEG 83 kb). Fig. S2 Bacteria phylogenetic tree m7. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the bacterial sequences obtained from m7 sample. References sequences from GenBank are included in the tree. The number in square brackets next to the sequence name indicates the number of copies found in the sample. Affiliation of the references genera to bacterial classes is shown
300_2018_2256_MOESM4_ESM.jpg (346 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (JPEG 346 kb).Fig. S3 Bacteria phylogenetic tree m8. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the bacterial sequences obtained from m8 sample. References sequences from GenBank are included in the tree. The number in square brackets next to the sequence name indicates the number of copies found in the sample. Affiliation of the references genera to bacterial classes is shown
300_2018_2256_MOESM5_ESM.jpg (366 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (JPEG 366 kb). Fig. S4 Bacteria phylogenetic tree m15. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the bacterial sequences obtained from m15 sample. References sequences from GenBank are included in the tree. The number in square brackets next to the sequence name indicates the number of copies found in the sample. Affiliation of the references genera to bacterial classes is shown
300_2018_2256_MOESM6_ESM.jpg (221 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (JPEG 221 kb). Fig. S5 Bacteria phylogenetic tree m16. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the bacterial sequences obtained from m16 sample. References sequences from GenBank are included in the tree. The number in square brackets next to the sequence name indicates the number of copies found in the sample. Affiliation of the references genera to bacterial classes is shown
300_2018_2256_MOESM7_ESM.jpg (273 kb)
Supplementary material 7 (JPEG 272 kb). Fig. S6 Cyanobacteria phylogenetic tree m7. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the cyanobacterial sequences obtained from m7 sample. References sequences from GenBank are included in the tree. The number in square brackets next to the sequence name indicates the number of copies found in the sample. Affiliation of the references genera to cyanobacterial orders is shown
300_2018_2256_MOESM8_ESM.jpg (149 kb)
Supplementary material 8 (JPEG 149 kb). Fig. S7 Cyanobacteria phylogenetic tree m8. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the cyanobacterial sequences obtained from m8 sample. References sequences from GenBank are included in the tree. The number in square brackets next to the sequence name indicates the number of copies found in the sample. Affiliation of the references genera to cyanobacterial orders is shown
300_2018_2256_MOESM9_ESM.jpg (152 kb)
Supplementary material 9 (JPEG 152 kb). Fig. S8 Cyanobacteria phylogenetic tree m15. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the cyanobacterial sequences obtained from m15 sample. References sequences from GenBank are included in the tree. The number in square brackets next to the sequence name indicates the number of copies found in the sample. Affiliation of the references genera to cyanobacterial orders is shown
300_2018_2256_MOESM10_ESM.jpg (162 kb)
Supplementary material 10 (JPEG 161 kb). Fig. S9 Cyanobacteria phylogenetic tree m16. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the cyanobacterial sequences obtained from m16 sample. References sequences from GenBank are included in the tree. The number in square brackets next to the sequence name indicates the number of copies found in the sample. Affiliation of the references genera to cyanobacterial orders is shown

References

  1. Brambilla E, Hippe H, Hagelstein A, Tindall BJ, Stackebrandt E (2001) 16S rDNA diversity of cultured and uncultured prokaryotes of a mat sample from Lake Fryxell, McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Extremophiles 5:23–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s007920000169 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Callejas C, Gill PR, Catalán AI, Azziz G, Castro-Sowinski S, Batista S (2011) Phylotype diversity in a benthic cyanobacterial mat community on King George Island, maritime Antarctica. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:1507–1512.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0578-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. de Los Ríos A, Ascaso C, Wierzchos J, Fernández-Valiente E, Quesada A (2004) Microstructural characterization of cyanobacterial mats from the McMurdo Ice Shelf, Antarctica. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:569–580.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.70.1.569-580.2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Wever A, Leliaert F, Verleyen E, Vanormelingen P, Van der Gucht K, Hodgson DA et al (2009) Hidden levels of phylodiversity in Antarctic green algae: further evidence for the existence of glacial refugia. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0994 Google Scholar
  5. Devereux R, Willis SG (1995) Amplification of ribosomal RNA sequences. In: Van der Zijpp AJ, van Elsas JD, de Bruijn F (eds) Molecular microbial ecology manual. Springer, Berlin, pp 277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis-Evans JC (1996) Microbial diversity and function in Antarctic freshwater ecosystems. Biodivers Conserv 5:1395–1431.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernández-Valiente E, Quesada A, Howard-Williams C, Hawes I (2001) N2-fixation in cyanobacterial mats from ponds on the McMurdo ice shelf, Antarctica. Microb Ecol 42:338–349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-001-1010-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernández-Valiente E, Camacho A, Rochera C, Rico E, Vincent WF, Quesada A (2007) Community structure and physiological characterization of microbial mats in Byers Peninsula, Livingston Island (South Shetland Islands, Antarctica). FEMS Microbiol Ecol 59:377–385.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00221.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gantner S, Andersson AF, Alonso-Sáez L, Bertilsson S (2011) Novel primers for 16S rRNA-based archaeal community analyses in environmental samples. J Microbiol Methods 84:12–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffiths RI, Whiteley AS, O’Donnell AG, Bailey MJ (2000) Rapid method for coextraction of DNA and RNA from natural environments for analysis of ribosomal DNA- and rRNA-based microbial community composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5488–5491.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.12.5488-5491.2000 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill TCJ, Walsh KA, Harris JA, Moffett BF (2003) Using ecological diversity measures with bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 43:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2003.tb01040.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Komárek J (2015) Review of the cyanobacterial genera implying planktic species after recent taxonomic revisions according to polyphasic methods: state as of 2014. Hydrobiologia 764:259–270.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2242-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Komárek O, Komárek J (1999) Diversity of freshwater and terrestrial habitats and their oxyphototroph microflora in the Arctowski Station region, South Shetland Islands. Polish Polar Res 20:259–282Google Scholar
  14. Komárek O, Komárek J (2010) Diversity and ecology of cyanobacterial microflora of Antarctic seepage habitats: comparison of King George Island, Shetland Islands and James Ross Island, NW Weddell Sea, Antarctica. In: Seckbach J, Oren A (eds) Microbial Mats. Modern and Ancient Microorganisms in Stratified Systems. pp 517–539Google Scholar
  15. Lane DJ (1991) Small subunit ribosomal RNA sequences and primers. Large subunit ribosomal RNA sequences and primers. Nucleic Acid Tech Bact Syst Chichester, UK John Wiley Sons 148–175Google Scholar
  16. McDonald IR, Upton M, Hall G, Pickup RW, Edwards C, Saunders JR et al (1999) Molecular ecological analysis of methanogens and methanotrophs in blanket bog peat. Microb Ecol 38:225–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nübel U, Garcia-Pichel F, Muyzer G (1997) PCR primers to amplify 16S rRNA genes from cyanobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:3327–3332PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Peeters K, Ertz D, Willems A (2011) Culturable bacterial diversity at the Princess Elisabeth Station (Utsteinen, Sør Rondane Mountains, East Antarctica) harbours many new taxa. Syst Appl Microbiol 34:360–367.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2011.02.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Peeters K, Verleyen E, Hodgson DA, Convey P, Ertz D, Vyverman W et al (2012) Heterotrophic bacterial diversity in aquatic microbial mat communities from Antarctica. Polar Biol 35:543–554.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-011-1100-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Robinson SA, Wasley J, Tobin AK (2003) Living on the edge–plants and global change in continental and maritime Antarctica. Glob Chang Biol 9:1681–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sabbe K, Hodgson DA, Verleyen E, Taton A, Wilmotte A, Vanhoutte K et al (2004) Salinity, depth and the structure and composition of microbial mats in continental Antarctic lakes. Freshw Biol 49:296–319.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01186.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schloss PD, Larget BR, Handelsman J (2004) Integration of microbial ecology and statistics: a test to compare gene libraries. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5485–5492.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.9.5485-5492.2004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Taton A, Grubisic S, Brambilla E, De Wit R, Wilmotte A (2003) Cyanobacterial diversity in natural and artificial microbial mats of Lake Fryxell (McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica): a morphological and molecular approach. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5157–5169.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.9.5157-5169.2003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Taton A, Grubisic S, Balthasart P, Hodgson DA, Laybourn-Parry J, Wilmotte A (2006) Biogeographical distribution and ecological ranges of benthic cyanobacteria in East Antarctic lakes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 57:272–289.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00110.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Vincent WF, Downes MT, Castenholz RW, Howard-Williams C (1993) Community structure and pigment organisation of cyanobacteria-dominated microbial mats in Antarctica. Eur J Phycol 28:213–221.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09670269300650321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang L, Jungblut AD, Hawes I, Andersen DT, Sumner DY, Mackey TJ (2015) Cyanobacterial diversity in benthic mats of the McMurdo Dry Valley lakes, Antarctica. Polar Biol 38:1097–1110.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-015-1669-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unidad de Microbiología MolecularInstituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable (MEC)MontevideoUruguay
  2. 2.Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyUniversidade Federal Do ParanáCuritibaBrazil

Personalised recommendations