Polar Biology

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 799–805 | Cite as

Anthropogenic debris in the diet of turkey vultures (Cathartes aura) in a remote and low-populated South Atlantic island

Original Paper

Abstract

Plastic pollution is becoming an increasing issue for wildlife throughout the world. Even remote areas with relatively little human activity are affected. The Falkland Islands are a South Atlantic archipelago with a small human population (<3000), mostly concentrated in one town, Stanley. One hundred regurgitated pellets from turkey vultures (Cathartes aura) were collected in Stanley in July and August 2015 to investigate the diet and amount of anthropogenic debris (human-made artificial products) ingested. The frequency of occurrence of anthropogenic debris was 58 % of pellets for plastic, 25 % for glass, 23 % for paper, 21 % for aluminium and 3 % for fabric. Aside from anthropogenic debris, the majority of pellets were made of sheep wool (on average 29 % of the volume), feathers (19 %) and vegetation (18 %). On average, when present, anthropogenic debris corresponded to 16.1 % of the mass of each pellet, equivalent to 1.6 g. The turkey vultures are known to feed in the open-air rubbish dump near the town. This study highlights that they ingest significant amounts of anthropogenic debris. Further investigations should be undertaken to monitor and identify potential health effects. Other birds also use the dump and may be affected. Even in such remote sparsely populated islands, pollution may be a significant issue. Rubbish management could be put in place to limit birds from feeding at the dumps. A low human population density may not indicate low pollution impacts on wildlife and the environment and should be investigated further in the Falkland Islands and at other remote islands.

Keywords

Plastic Pollution Cathartidae Feeding Waste management Falkland Islands 

References

  1. Barnes DKA, Walters A, Gonçalves L (2010) Macroplastics at sea around Antarctica. Mar Environ Res 70:250–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Benson PC, Plug I, Dobbs JC (2004) An analysis of bones and other materials collected by cape vultures at the Kransberg and Blouberg colonies, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Ostrich 75:118–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breen BM, Bildstein KL (2008) Distribution and abundance of the turkey vulture Cathartes Aura Falkandica in the Falkland Islands, summer 2006–2007 and autumn–winter 2007. Falklands Conservation, StanleyGoogle Scholar
  4. Coleman JS, Fraser JD (1989) Habitat use and home ranges of black and turkey vultures. J Wildl Manag 53:782–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crofts S (2014) An interim report on baseline levels of beached marine debris at the Falkland Islands. Falklands Conservation, StanleyGoogle Scholar
  6. Dwyer JF, Cockwell SG (2011) Social hierarchy of scavenging raptors on the Falkland Islands, Malvinas. J Raptor Res 45:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Graves GR (1992) Greater yellow-headed vulture (Cathartes melambrotus) locates food by olfaction. J Raptor Res 26:38–39Google Scholar
  8. Green DS, Boots B, Blockley DJ, Rocha C, Thompson R (2015) Impacts of discarded plastic bags on marine assemblages and ecosystem functioning. Environ Sci Technol 49:5380–5389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Houston DC, Mee A, McGrady M, Warkentin IG (2007) Why do condors and vultures eat junk? The implications for conservation. J Raptor Res 41:235–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kelly NE, Sparks DW, DeVault TL, Rhodes OE Jr (2007) Diet of black and turkey vultures in a forested landscape. Wilson J Ornithol 119:267–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mee A, Rideout BA, Hamber JA, Todd JN, Austin G, Clark M, Wallace MP (2007) Junk ingestion and nestling mortality in a reintroduced population of California condors Gymnogyps californianus. Bird Conserv Int 17:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. O’Neal Campbell M (2016) Vultures: their evolution, ecology and conservation. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  13. Provencher JF, Bond AL, Hedd A, Montevecchi WA, Muzaffar SB, Courchesne SJ, Gilchrist HG, Jamieson SE, Merkel FR, Falk K, Durinck J, Mallory ML (2014) Prevalence of marine debris in marine birds from the North Atlantic. Mar Pollut Bull 84:411–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. QGIS Development Team (2015) QGIS geographic information system. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. http://qgis.osgeo.org
  15. Rech S, Macaya-Caquilpán V, Pantoja JF, Rivadeneira MM, Jofre Madariaga D, Thiel M (2014) Rivers as a source of marine litter—a study from the SE Pacific. Mar Pollut Bull 82:66–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rexer-Huber K, Bildstein KL (2012) Winter diet of striated caracara Phalcoboenus australis (Aves, Polyborinae) at a farm settlement on the Falkland Islands. Polar Biol 36:437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rochman CM, Browne MA, Halpern BS, Hentschel BT, Hoh E, Karapanagioti HK, Rios-Mendoza LM, Takada H, Teh S, Thompson RC (2013) Policy: classify plastic waste as hazardous. Nature 494:169–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sazima I (2013) From carrion-eaters to bathers’ bags plunderers: how black vultures (Coragyps atratus) could have found that plastic bags may contain food. Braz J Ornithol 15:4Google Scholar
  19. Torres-Mura JC, Lemus ML, Hertel F (2015) Plastic material in the diet of the turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) in the Atacama Desert, Chile. Wilson J Ornithol 127:134–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wilcox C, Sebille EV, Hardesty BD (2015) Threat of plastic pollution to seabirds is global, pervasive, and increasing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:11899–11904CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Woods R, Woods A (1997) Atlas of breeding birds of the Falkland Islands. Anthony Nelson, ShropshireGoogle Scholar
  22. Yorio P, Giaccardi M (2002) Urban and fishery waste tips as food sources for birds in northern coastal Patagonia, Argentina. Ornitol Neotrop 13:283–292Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.South Atlantic Environmental Research InstituteStanleyFalkland Islands

Personalised recommendations