Advertisement

Polar Biology

, Volume 38, Issue 10, pp 1713–1725 | Cite as

Estimating the abundance of the Southern Hudson Bay polar bear subpopulation with aerial surveys

  • Martyn E. Obbard
  • Seth Stapleton
  • Kevin R. Middel
  • Isabelle Thibault
  • Vincent Brodeur
  • Charles Jutras
Original Paper

Abstract

The Southern Hudson Bay (SH) polar bear subpopulation occurs at the southern extent of the species’ range. Although capture–recapture studies indicate abundance was likely unchanged between 1986 and 2005, declines in body condition and survival occurred during the period, possibly foreshadowing a future decrease in abundance. To obtain a current estimate of abundance, we conducted a comprehensive line transect aerial survey of SH during 2011–2012. We stratified the study site by anticipated densities and flew coastal contour transects and systematically spaced inland transects in Ontario and on Akimiski Island and large offshore islands in 2011. Data were collected with double-observer and distance sampling protocols. We surveyed small islands in James Bay and eastern Hudson Bay and flew a comprehensive transect along the Québec coastline in 2012. We observed 667 bears in Ontario and on Akimiski Island and nearby islands in 2011, and we sighted 80 bears on offshore islands during 2012. Mark–recapture distance sampling and sight–resight models yielded an estimate of 860 (SE = 174) for the 2011 study area. Our estimate of abundance for the entire SH subpopulation (943; SE = 174) suggests that abundance is unlikely to have changed significantly since 1986. However, this result should be interpreted cautiously because of the methodological differences between historical studies (physical capture–recapture) and this survey. A conservative management approach is warranted given previous increases in duration of the ice-free season, which are predicted to continue in the future, and previously documented declines in body condition and vital rates.

Keywords

Abundance estimation Aerial survey Line transect Mark–recapture distance sampling Polar bear Southern Hudson Bay Ursus maritimus 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for the 2011 survey was provided by the Species At Risk Branch and the Wildlife Research and Monitoring Section of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. The 2012 survey was jointly funded by Environment Canada, World Wildlife Fund (Canada), Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune du Québec, the Government of Nunavut Department of Environment, Makivik Corporation, and the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Additional support for analysis and reporting was provided by the U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not represent endorsement by the U.S. government. We thank helicopter pilot Doug Holtby and observers Brandon Laforest, Robbie Koostachin, Matthew Gull, and Tommy Miles for assistance in the field in 2011. We thank Twin Otter pilot Greg Dibben and observers Marc Rondeau, Stephen Casselmann, and Rod Brook for assistance during the survey of James Bay islands in 2012. We thank Twin Otter pilots Red Seguin and Emily Crombez and observers Angela Coxon, William Flaherty, Billy Nowkawalk, Peter May, and Peter Kattuk for assistance during the survey of offshore islands in eastern Hudson Bay in 2012. We thank helicopter pilot Richard Perron and observers Billy Nowkawalk, Allen House, and Abraham Snowboy for assistance during the survey of the coast and near-shore islands of Québec in 2012. Comments from T. Atwood, J. Bromaghin, and 3 anonymous referees helped us to improve an earlier version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Aars J, Marques TA, Buckland ST, Andersen M, Belikov S, Boltunov A, Wiig Ø (2009) Estimating the Barents Sea polar bear subpopulation size. Mar Mamm Sci 25:35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amstrup SC, Marcot BG, Douglas DC (2008) A Bayesian network modeling approach to forecasting the 21st century worldwide status of polar bears. In: De Weaver ET, Bitz CM, Tremblay LB (eds) Arctic sea ice decline: observations, projections, mechanisms, and implications. Geophysical monograph 180. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 213–268Google Scholar
  3. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (2004) Impacts of a warming climate. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Borchers DL, Laake JL, Southwell C, Paxton CGM (2006) Accommodating unmodeled heterogeneity in double-observer distance sampling surveys. Biometrics 62:372–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Canadian Ice Service (2013) Canadian Ice Service archive. http://iceweb1.cis.ec.gc.ca/Archive20/page1.xhtml?lang=en. Accessed 15 Aug 2013
  8. Castro de la Guardia L, Derocher AE, Myers PG, Terwisscha van Scheltinga AD, Lunn NJ (2013) Future sea ice conditions in Western Hudson Bay and consequences for polar bears in the 21st century. Glob Change Biol 19:2675–2687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Comiso JC, Parkinson CL, Gersten R, Stock L (2008) Accelerated decline in the Arctic sea ice cover. Geophys Res Lett 35:L01703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crête M, Vandal D, Rivest L, Potvin F (1991) Double counts in aerial surveys to estimate polar bear numbers during the ice-free period. Arctic 44:275–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Derocher AE, Stirling I (1990) Distribution of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) during the ice-free period in western Hudson Bay. Can J Zool 68:1395–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derocher AE, Lunn NJ, Stirling I (2004) Polar bears in a warming climate. Integr Comp Biol 44:163–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Doutt JK (1967) Polar bear dens on the Twin Islands James Bay, Canada. J Mammal 48:468–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Etkin DA (1991) Break-up in Hudson Bay: its sensitivity to air temperatures and implications for climate warming. Climatol Bull 25:21–34Google Scholar
  15. Fewster R, Southwell C, Borchers D, Buckland S, Pople A (2008) The influence of animal mobility on the assumption of uniform distances in aerial line-transect surveys. Wildl Res 35:275–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gagnon AS, Gough WA (2005) Trends in the dates of ice freeze-up and breakup over Hudson Bay, Canada. Arctic 58:370–382Google Scholar
  17. Giudice JH, Fieberg JR, Lenarz MS (2012) Spending degrees of freedom in a poor economy: a case study of building a sightability model for moose in northeastern Minnesota. J Wildl Manage 76:75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gough WA, Cornwell AR, Tsuji LJS (2004) Trends in seasonal sea ice duration in southwestern Hudson Bay. Arctic 57:299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hochheim KP, Barber DG (2014) An update on the ice climatology of the Hudson Bay system. Arct Antarct Alp Res 46:66–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hochheim KP, Lukovich JV, Barber DG (2011) Atmospheric forcing of sea ice in Hudson Bay during the spring period, 1980–2005. J Mar Syst 88:476–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huggins R (1989) On the statistical analysis of capture experiments. Biometrika 76:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huggins R (1991) Practical aspects of a conditional likelihood approach to capture experiments. Biometrics 47:725–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Innes S, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Laake JL, Laidre KL, Cleator HJ, Richard P, Stewart REA (2002) Surveys of belugas and narwhals in the Canadian High Arctic in 1996. NAMMCO Sci Publ 4:169–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jonkel C, Smith P, Stirling I, Kolenosky GB (1976) Notes on the present status of the polar bear in James Bay and the Belcher Islands. Canadian Wildlife Service Occas Pap No. 26, Canadian Wildlife Service, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  25. Kolenosky GB, Prevett JP (1983) Productivity and maternity denning of polar bears in Ontario. Int Conf Bear Res Manage 5:238–245Google Scholar
  26. Kolenosky GB, Abraham KF, Greenwood CJ (1992) Polar bears of Southern Hudson Bay. Polar bear project, 1984–1988: final report. Unpublished report, Wildlife Research Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, MapleGoogle Scholar
  27. Laake JL, Borchers D (2004) Methods for incomplete detection at distance zero. In: Buckland S, Anderson D, Burnham K, Laake J, Borchers D, Thomas L (eds) Advanced distance sampling. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 108–189Google Scholar
  28. Leafloor JO (1990) A summary of polar bear surveys in Ontario, 1963–1990. Unpublished report, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, MoosoneeGoogle Scholar
  29. Leafloor JO (1991) Polar bear management in Ontario: a review and recommendations. Unpublished report, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, MoosoneeGoogle Scholar
  30. Lemelin RH, Dowsley M, Walmark B, Siebel F, Bird L, Hunter G, Myles T, Mack M, Gull M, Kakekaspan M (2010) Wabusk of the Omushkegouk: Cree-polar bear (Ursus maritimus) interactions in Northern Ontario. Hum Ecol 38:803–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Markham WE (1986) The ice cover. In: Martini IP (ed) Canadian inland seas. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Markham WE (1988) Ice atlas: Hudson Bay and approaches. Environment Canada, Atmospheric Environment Service, DownsviewGoogle Scholar
  33. Marques TA, Andersen M, Christensen-Dalsgaard S, Belikov S, Boltunov A, Wiig Ø, Buckland ST, Aars J (2006) The use of global positioning systems to record distances in a helicopter line-transect survey. Wildl Soc Bull 34:759–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McDonald M, Arragutainaq L, Novalinga Z (1997) Voices from the Bay: traditional ecological knowledge of Inuit and Cree in the Hudson Bay bioregion. Can Arct Res Comm, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  35. Middel KR (2013) Movement parameters and space use for the Southern Hudson Bay polar bear subpopulation in the face of a changing climate. Thesis, Trent UniversityGoogle Scholar
  36. Molnár PK, Derocher AE, Thiemann GW, Lewis MA (2010) Predicting survival, reproduction and abundance of polar bears under climate change. Biol Conserv 143:1612–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Molnár PK, Derocher AE, Klanjscek T, Lewis MA (2011) Predicting climate change impacts on polar bear litter size. Nat Comm 2(186):1–8Google Scholar
  38. Obbard ME (2008) Southern Hudson Bay polar bear project 2003–2005: final report. Unpublished report, Wildlife Research and Development Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  39. Obbard ME, Middel KR (2012) Bounding the Southern Hudson Bay polar bear subpopulation. Ursus 23:134–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Obbard ME, Walton LR (2004) The importance of Polar Bear Provincial Park to the Southern Hudson Bay polar bear population in the context of future climate change. In: Rehbein CK, Nelson JG, Beechey TJ, Payne RJ (eds) Parks and protected areas research in Ontario, 2004: planning northern parks and protected areas. Proceedings of the Parks Research Forum of Ontario annual general meeting, May 4–6, 2004. Parks Research Forum of Ontario, Waterloo, pp 105–116Google Scholar
  41. Obbard ME, Cattet MRL, Moody T, Walton LR, Potter D, Inglis J, Chenier C (2006) Temporal trends in the body condition of Southern Hudson Bay polar bears. Climate Change Research Information Note, No. 3. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Sault Ste. MarieGoogle Scholar
  42. Obbard ME, McDonald TL, Howe EJ, Regehr EV, Richardson ES (2007) Polar bear population status in Southern Hudson Bay, Canada. Administrative report, U.S. Geological Survey, RestonGoogle Scholar
  43. Parkinson CL, Cavalieri DJ, Gloersen P, Zwally HJ, Comiso JC (1999) Arctic sea ice extents, areas, and trends, 1978–1996. J Geophys Res 104C:20837–20856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lunn NJ, Branigan M, Carpenter L, Justus J, Hedman D, Larsen D, Lefort S, Maraj R, Obbard ME, Peacock E, Pokiak, F (2010) Polar bear management in Canada, 2005–2008. In: Obbard ME, Thiemann GW, Peacock E, DeBruyn TD (eds) Polar bears: proceedings of the 15th working meeting of the IUCN/SSC Polar Bear Specialist Group, 29 June–3 July 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark. Occas Pap IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 43. IUCN, Gland and Cambridge, pp 87–113Google Scholar
  45. Polar Bear Specialist Group (2015) Summary of polar bear population status, 2014. http://pbsg.npolar.no/en/status/status-table.html. Accessed 25 March 2015
  46. Pollock K, Kendall W (1987) Visibility bias in aerial surveys: a review of estimation procedures. J Wildl Manage 51:502–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Powell L (2007) Approximating variance of demographic parameters using the delta method: a reference for avian biologists. Condor 109:949–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prevett JP, Kolenosky GB (1982) The status of polar bears in Ontario. Nat Can 109:933–939Google Scholar
  49. Regehr EV, Lunn NJ, Amstrup SC, Stirling I (2007) Effects of earlier sea ice breakup on survival and population size of polar bears in western Hudson Bay. J Wildl Manage 71:2673–2683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Russell RH (1975) Food habits of polar bears of James Bay and southwest Hudson Bay in summer and autumn. Arctic 28:117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saucier FJ, Senneville S, Prinsenberg FR, Smith G, Gachon P, Caya D, Laprise R (2004) Modelling the sea ice–ocean seasonal cycle in Hudson Bay, Foxe Basin and Hudson Strait, Canada. Clim Dynam 23:303–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scott JBT, Marshall GJ (2010) A step-change in the date of sea-ice breakup in western Hudson Bay. Arctic 63:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith DA (1998) Recent increase in the length of the melt season of perennial Arctic sea ice. Geophys Res Lett 25:655–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stapleton S, Atkinson S, Hedman D, Garshelis D (2014) Revisiting Western Hudson Bay: using aerial surveys to update polar bear abundance in a sentinel population. Biol Conserv 170:38–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stapleton S, Peacock E, Garshelis D (2015) Aerial surveys suggest long-term stability in the seasonally ice-free Foxe Basin (Nunavut) polar bear population. Mar Mamm Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  56. Stirling I, Archibald WR (1977) Aspects of predation of seals by polar bears. J Fish Res Board Can 34:1126–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stirling I, Derocher AE (1993) Possible impacts of climatic warming on polar bears. Arctic 46:240–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stirling I, Derocher AE (2012) Effects of climate warming on polar bears: a review of the evidence. Glob Change Biol 18:2694–2706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stirling I, Parkinson CL (2006) Possible effects of climate warming on selected populations of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Canadian Arctic. Arctic 59:261–275Google Scholar
  60. Stirling I, Lunn NJ, Iacozza J (1999) Long-term trends in the population ecology of polar bears in Western Hudson Bay in relation to climatic change. Arctic 52:294–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stirling I, Lunn NJ, Iacozza J, Elliott C, Obbard M (2004) Polar bear distribution and abundance on the southwestern Hudson Bay coast during open water season, in relation to population trends and annual ice patterns. Arctic 57:15–26Google Scholar
  62. Stirling I, Thiemann GW, Richardson E (2008) Quantitative support for a subjective fatness index for immobilized polar bears. J Wildl Manage 72:568–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stroeve J, Holland MM, Meier W, Scambos T, Serreze M (2007) Arctic sea ice decline: faster than forecast. Geophys Res Lett 34:L09501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stroeve J, Serreze M, Holland M, Kay J, Malanik J, Barrett A (2012) The Arctic’s rapidly shrinking sea ice cover: a research synthesis. Clim Change 110:1005–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thomas L, Buckland ST, Rexstad EA, Laake JL, Strindberg S, Hedley SL, Bishop RB, Marques TA, Burnham KP (2010) Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. J Appl Ecol 47:5–14PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Towns L, Derocher AE, Stirling I, Lunn NJ (2010) Changes in land distribution of polar bears in western Hudson Bay. Arctic 63:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang J, Mysak LA, Ingram RG (1994a) Interannual variability of sea-ice cover in Hudson Bay, Baffin Bay, and the Labrador Sea. Atmos Ocean 32:421–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang J, Mysak LA, Ingram RG (1994b) A numerical simulation of sea ice cover in Hudson Bay. J Phys Oceanogr 24:2515–2533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(Supplement):120–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martyn E. Obbard
    • 1
  • Seth Stapleton
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kevin R. Middel
    • 1
  • Isabelle Thibault
    • 4
  • Vincent Brodeur
    • 5
  • Charles Jutras
    • 5
  1. 1.Wildlife Research and Monitoring Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, DNA BuildingTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyAlaska Science CenterAnchorageUSA
  3. 3.Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation BiologyUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  4. 4.Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des ParcsDirection de la biodiversité et des maladies de la fauneQuebecCanada
  5. 5.Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des ParcsDirection de la gestion de la faune du Nord-du-QuébecChibougamauCanada

Personalised recommendations