Diet of female polar bears in the southern Beaufort Sea of Alaska: evidence for an emerging alternative foraging strategy in response to environmental change
- 1.1k Downloads
Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) diet may become more variable in some Arctic regions due to climate warming and altered sea ice habitat. We surveyed carbon and nitrogen stable isotope profiles of five polar bear tissues sampled from adult females in the Southern Beaufort Sea of Alaska in order to assess inter-tissue isotopic variability and to determine whether any dietary shifts are occurring in this population. We did not detect any significant shifts from historical means in population-level tissue stable isotope values. A number of sectioned hair samples, however, were significantly depleted in 15N relative to the mean. We hypothesized that lower hair δ15N values were due to the consumption of bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) tissue. Telemetry data showed that polar bears with 15N-depleted hair sections were located on multiple dates near known subsistence-harvested bowhead whale bone piles and had spent 90 % of the prior year within 50 km of the shore. Bears with hair section δ15N values at or above the mean spent no time near bowhead whale bone piles and less than half of the year nearshore. An isotopic mixing model estimation of diet proportions determined that bowhead whale comprised approximately 50–70 % of fall diet for bears with lower hair δ15N values. We conclude that these results offer emergent evidence of an alternative foraging strategy within this population: ‘coastal’ bears, which remain near to shore for much of the year and use bowhead whale bone piles when they are present. In contrast, ‘pelagic’ bears follow a more typical strategy and forage widely on sea ice for seals.
KeywordsAlaska Arctic Bowhead whale Foraging ecology Polar bear Stable isotopes Telemetry
This work is part of the US Geological Survey’s Changing Arctic Ecosystem Initiative and is supported by funding from the Wildlife Program of the USGS Ecosystem Mission Area. Additional support was provided by the USGS Climate and Land Use Change Mission Area, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, the Bureau of Land Management, and the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The analyses were made possible in part by a National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation award (0953271) to J. Welker that assisted in establishing the University of Alaska Anchorage Stable Isotope Laboratory. Naomi Bargmann provided vital assistance in the sample analysis. We thank George Durner and Anthony Pagano for their significant contributions to fieldwork and data management associated with polar bear sampling and PTT deployment, and Todd Atwood and Øystein Wiig for providing constructive comments on a previous version of the manuscript. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.
- Amstrup SC (2003) The Polar Bear—Ursus maritimus. In: Feldhamer GA, Thompson BC, Chapman JA (eds) Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 587–610Google Scholar
- Durner GM, Douglas DC, Nielson RM, Amstrup SC, McDonald TL, Stirling I, Mauritzen M, Born EW, Wiig Ø, DeWeaver E, Serreze MC, Belikov SE, Holland MM, Maslanik J, Aars J, Bailey DA, Derocher AE (2009) Predicting 21st-century polar bear habitat distribution from global climate models. Ecol Monogr 79:25–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Koch PL (2007) Isotopic study of the biology of modern and fossil vertebrates. In: Michener R, Lajtha K (eds) Stable isotopes in ecology and environmental science, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Parnell AC, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL (2010) Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too much variation. PLoS ONE 5:1–5Google Scholar
- Vongraven D, Aars J, Amstrup SC, Atkinson SN, Belikov S, Born EW, DeBruyn T, Derocher AE, Gill M, Lunn NJ, Obbard ME, Omelak J, Ovsyanikov NG, Peacock E, Richardson E, Sahanatien V, Stirling I, Wiig Ø (2012) A circumpolar monitoring framework for polar bears. Ursus Monogr Ser 23:1–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar