Abstract
In surveys recording polar bear maternity dens, the proportion of actual dens in an area detected has usually been unknown. In this study, I evaluate how the proportion of dens that are observable varies with time in spring based on three 3–4 weeks ground surveys and observations of 25, 13, and 5 dens in Svalbard, Norwegian Arctic, during 2009, 2011 and 2012. The data indicate that few dens will be detected in surveys before early April, as few bears will have emerged at that time. Dens became unobservable after periods of drifting snow but are subsequently reopened within one or 2 days by occupying bears. Most bears departed dens by late April, and abandoned dens were quickly concealed by drifting snows. As such, I suggest that the optimal period for conducting an aerial survey is early to mid-April on a day with low winds and good visibility, because about half of the dens could be expected to be observable. Because emergence date, duration at den site, and abandonment dates varied considerably, uncertainty around the proportion of polar bear maternal dens detected during a survey will be large.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amstrup SC (1993) Human disturbances of denning polar bears in Alaska. Arctic 46:246–250
Amstrup SC (2003) Polar bear (Ursus maritimus). In: Feldhamer GA, Thopmson BC, Chapman JA (eds) Wild mammals of North America: biology, management and conservation, 2nd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 587–610
Amstrup SC, Gardner C (1994) Polar bear maternity denning in the Beaufort Sea. J Wildl Manage 58:1–10
Amstrup SC, York G, McDonald TL, Nielson R, Simac K (2004) Detecting polar bears with forward-looking infrared (FLIR) imagery. Bioscience 54:337–344
Andersen M, Aars J (2008) Short-term behavioural response of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) to snowmobile disturbance. Polar Biol 31:501–507
Andersen M, Derocher AE, Wiig Ø, Aars J (2012) Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) maternity den distribution in Svalbard, Norway. Polar Biol 35:499–508
Belikov S (1980) Distribution and structure of dens of female polar bears in Wrangel Island. Int Conf Bear Res Manage 4:117
Derocher AE (2005) Population ecology of polar bears at Svalbard, Norway. Popul Ecol 47:267–275
Derocher A, Andersen M, Wiig Ø, Aars J, Hansen E, Biuw M (2011) Sea ice and polar bear den ecology at Hopen Island, Svalbard. MEPS 441:273–279
Ernstsen A, Dannevig P (1981) Nedbøren på Spitsbergen. Været. 3, Norske Meteorol. Inst., Oslo, Norway
Fischbach AS, Amstrup SC, Douglas DC (2007) Landward and eastward shift of Alaskan polar bear denning associated with recent sea ice changes. Polar Biol 30:1395–1405
Hansson R, Thomassen J (1983) Behavior of polar bears with cubs in the denning area. Int Conf Bear Res Manage 5:246–254
Harington CR (1968) Denning habits of the polar bear (Ursus maritimus Phipps). Can Wildl Serv Rep 5:1–30
Kolenosky GB, Prevett JP (1983) Productivity and maternity denning of polar bears in Ontario. Int Conf Bear Res Manage 5:238–245
Larsen T (1974) Polar bear den surveys in Svalbard, 1972 and 1973. In: 3rd International conference on bears, pp 199–208
Larsen T (1985) Polar bear denning and cub production in Svalbard, Norway. J Wildl Manage 49:320–326
Lønø O (1970) The polar bear (Ursus maritimus Phipps) in the Svalbard area. Nor Polarinst Skr 149:1–115
Ovsyanikov N (1998) Den use and social interactions of polar bears during spring in a dense denning area on Herald Island, Russia. Ursus 10:251–258
R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Ramsay MA, Andriashek DS (1986) Long distance route orientation of female polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in spring. J Zool 208:63–72
Ramsay R, Stirling I (1986) Long-term effects of drugging and handling free-ranging polar bears. Can J Wildl Manage 50:619–626
Ramsay M, Stirling I (1990) Fidelity of female polar bears to winter den sites. J Mamm 71:233–236
Regehr EV, Lunn NJ, Amstrup SC, Stirling I (2007) Survival and population size of polar bears in western Hudson Bay in relation to earlier sea ice breakup. J Wildl Manage 71:2673–2683
Smith TS, Partridge ST, Amstrup SC, Schliebe S (2007) Post-den emergence behavior of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in Northern Alaska. Arctic 60:187–194
Uspenski SM, Belikov SE (1980) Data on the winter ecology of the polar bear in Wrangel Island. Int Conf Bear Res Manage 4:119
Uspenski SM, Kistchinski AA (1972) New data on the winter ecology of the polar bear (Ursus maritimus Phipps) on Wrangel Island. Int Conf Bear Res Manage 2:181–197
Vinje T (1976) Sea ice conditions in the European sector of the marginal seas of the Arctic 1966–1975. Norsk Polarinstitutt Årbok 1975:163–174
White GC (2005) Correcting wildlife counts using detection probabilities. Wildlife Res 32:211–216
Wiig Ø (1998) Survival and reproductive rates for the polar bears at Svalbard. Ursus 10:25–32
Acknowledgments
In the field, Øystein Overrein, Thor S. Larsen, and Tommy Sandal did a great job surveying dens in cold and challenging conditions. Thor S. Larsen worked in the areas several times back in the 1970s and shared important knowledge about the area and denning behavior. The governor of Svalbard allowed use of the cabin at Kapp Koburg and access to the area. The World Wildlife Fund supported the work financially. George M. Durner, Anthony Fischbach, Tom Smith, and two anonymous reviewers contributed highly useful suggestions for improving this article. Anthony Fischbach also kindly edited the language.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aars, J. Variation in detection probability of polar bear maternity dens. Polar Biol 36, 1089–1096 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-013-1331-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-013-1331-7