Skip to main content
Log in

Mortality rates clarified: reply to Breen et al. (2012)

  • Reply To
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 19 July 2012

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Chilvers and McKenzie (2010) refer to survival estimates and Chilvers (2012a) refers to mortality estimates. To prevent confusion in terminology the Chilvers and McKenzie (2010) estimates will be expressed in mortality rather than survival estimates.

References

  • Baker A (1999) Unusual mortality of the New Zealand sea lion, Phocarctos hookeri, Auckland Islands, January–February 1998. Department of Conservation, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauplet G, Barbraud C, Dabin W, Kussener C, Guinet C (2006) Age-specific survival and reproductive performances in fur seals: evidence of senescence and individual quality. Oikos 112:430–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd IL (1992) Steller sea lion research. Report National Marine Fisheries Service. National Marine Mammal Laboratory, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd IL, Lunn NJ, Rothery P, Croxall JP (1990) Age distribution of breeding female Antarctic fur seals in relation to changes in population growth rate. Can J Zool 68:2209–2213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd IL, Lockyer C, Marsh HD (1999) Reproduction in Marine Mammals. In: Reynolds JE, Rommel SA (eds) Biology of Marine Mammals. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen PA, Gilbert DJ, Starr PJ (2012) Comment on sea lion population viability analysis. Polar Biol. doi:10.1007/s00300-012-1218-z

  • Chilvers (2012a) Population viability analysis of New Zealand sea lions, Auckland Islands, New Zealand’s sub-Antarctics: assessing relative impacts and uncertainty. Polar Biol. doi:10.1007/s00300-011-1143-6

  • Chilvers BL (2012b) Using life-history traits of New Zealand sea lions, Auckland Islands to clarify potential causes of decline. J Zool (Lond) 287:240–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilvers BL, Mackenzie D (2010) Age and sex specific survival estimates incorporating tag loss for New Zealand sea lions, Phocarctos hookeri. J Mammal 91:758–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Camacho CJ, Aurioles-Gamboa D, Laake J, Gerber LR (2008) Survival rates of the California sea lion, Zalophus californianus, in Mexico. J Mammol 89:1059–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs K, Aguilar A, Aurioles D, Burkanov V, Campagna C, Gales N, Gelatt T, Goldsworthy SD, Goodman SJ, Hofmeyr GJG, Harkonen T, Lowry L, Lydersen C, Schipper J, Sipilat T, Southwell C, Stuart S, Thompson D, Trillmich F (2011) Global threats to pinnipeds. Mar Mamm Sci. doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.2011.00479.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton GW, Pitcher KW, Fritz LW, York AE, Raum-Suryan KL, Loughlin TR, Calkins DG, Hastings KK, Gelatt TS (2006) Survival of Steller sea lions in Alaska: a comparison of increasing and decreasing populations. Can J Zool 84:1163–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson BC, Chilvers BL (2011) New Zealand sea lions Phocarctos hookeri possible causes of population decline. Mammal Rev 41:253–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe WD (2007) Necropsy of marine mammals captured in New Zealand fisheries in the fishing year 2005–2006. Final report, Contract ENV2005/04, Ministry of Fisheries

  • Thompson FN, Oliver MD, Abraham ER (2010) Estimation of the capture of New Zealand sea lions (Phocarctos hookeri) in trawl fisheries from 1995–1996 to 2007–2008. Aquatic environment and biodiversity, New Zealand (Report No 52)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

B. Louise Chilvers has researched New Zealand sea lions for the last 12 years either through a post-doctorial fellowship with the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology of New Zealand or the Department of Conservation, New Zealand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Louise Chilvers.

Additional information

This is a reply to the comment of Breen et al. (2012) Comment on sea lion population viability analysis. Polar Biol. doi:10.1007/s00300-012-1218-z.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chilvers, B.L. Mortality rates clarified: reply to Breen et al. (2012). Polar Biol 35, 1619–1620 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-012-1219-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-012-1219-y

Keywords

Navigation