Polar Biology

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 635–639 | Cite as

High Arctic vegetation after 70 years: a repeated analysis from Svalbard

  • Karel PrachEmail author
  • Jiří Košnar
  • Jitka Klimešová
  • Martin Hais
Original Paper


We asked whether vegetation mapping repeated after 70 years revealed vegetation changes in the high Arctic. The study site is located at 78°38′N, 16°45′E, near Brucebyen at the Adolfbukta Bay (head of Billjefjorden) in central Spitsbergen (Svalbard), and encompasses an area of 2,042 × 521 m. The mapping carried out in 2008 did not reveal any changes in vegetation, since a previous study in 1936–1937, that could be attributed to climate change. We argue that our finding can be interpreted as evidence of a slow ecological response of constituent plants in such a harsh environment. Moreover, geographic isolation may limit establishment and expansion of new species. Some successional changes were only due to erosion–accumulation processes connected especially to stream activity.


Vegetation mapping Vascular plants Bryophytes Climate change Svalbard Succession 



This research was supported by the Ministry of Education of Czech Republic (INGO LA 341), Grant AV0Z60050516 from the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic and by MSM6007665801. Identification of some vascular plants was checked by Milan Štech (České Budějovice), of Lophozia by Jiří Váňa (Prague), and of Campylium by Lars Hedenäs (Stockholm). We thank to referees and Dieter Piepenburg for their comments, Brian Tlougan and Max Wade for English revision, and Petra Konvalinková for drawing the maps.

Supplementary material

300_2009_739_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)


  1. Acock AM (1940) Vegetation of a calcareous inner fjord region in Spitsbergen. J Ecol 28:81–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alsos IG, Eidesen PB, Ehrich D, Skrede I, Westergaard K, Jacobsen GH, Landvik JY, Taberlet P, Brochmann C (2007) Frequent long-distance plant colonization in the changing Arctic. Science 316:1606–1609CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Callaghan TV, Jonasson S, Brooker RW (1997) Arctic clonal plants and global change. In: de Kroon H, van Groenendael J (eds) The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Backhuys Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  4. Cannone N, Guglielmin M, Gerdol R (2004) Relationships between vegetation patterns and periglacial landforms in northwestern Svalbard. Polar Biol 27:562–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper EJ, Alsos IG, Hagen D, Smith FM, Coulson SJ, Hodkinson ID (2004) Plant recruitment in the High Arctic: seed bank and seedling emergence on Svalbard. J Veget Sci 15:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coppin P, Jonckheere I, Nackaerts K, Muys B, Lambin E (2004) Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. Int J Remote Sens 25:1565–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crawford RMM, Chapman HM, Abbot RJ, Balfour J (1993) Potential impact of climatic warming on arctic vegetation. Flora 188:367–381Google Scholar
  8. Elvebakk A (2005) ‘Arctic hotspot complexes’—proposed priority sites for studying and monitoring effects of climate change on arctic biodiversity. Phytocenologia 35:1067–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elvebakk A, Prestrud P (eds) (1996) A catalogue of Svalbard plants, fungi, algae and cyanobacteria. Norwegian Polar Institute, OsloGoogle Scholar
  10. Hodkinson ID, Coulson SJ, Webb NR (2003) Community assembly along proglacial chronosequences in the high Arctic: vegetation and soil development in north-west Svalbard. J Ecol 91:651–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van den Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (2001) Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change. The science of climate change, Contribution of Working Group I to the Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Third assessment report. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Jónsdóttir IS (2005) Terrestrial ecosystems on Svalbard: heterogeneity, complexity and fragility from an Arctic island perspective. Biol Env Proc R Irish Acad 105B:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karlén W (2005) Recent global warming: an artefact of a too-short temperature record? Ambio 34:263–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Karlsen SR, Elvebakk A (2003) A method using indicator plants to map local climatic variation in the Kangerlussuaq/Scoresby Sund area, East Greenland. J Biogeogr 30:1469–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klein DR, Bruun HH, Lundgren R, Philipp M (2008) Climate change influences on species interrelationships and distribution in high-Arctic Greenland. Adv Ecol Res 40:81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Körner Ch (2003) Alpine plant life. A functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Liška J, Soldán Z (2004) Alien vascular plants recorded from the Barentsburg and Pyramiden settlements, Svalbard. Preslia 76:279–290Google Scholar
  18. Moritz RE, Bitz CM, Steig EJ (2002) Dynamics of recent climate change in the Arctic. Science 297:1497–1502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Neilson RP, Pitelka LF, Solomon AM, Nathan R, Midgley GF, Fragoso JMV, Lischke H, Thompson K (2005) Forecasting regional to global plant migration in response to climate change. Bioscience 55:749–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nylehn J, Totland O (1999) Effects of temperature and natural disturbances on growth, reproduction, and population density in the alpine annual hemiparasite Euphrasia frigida. Arct Antarct Alp Res 31:259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Ann Rev Ecol Evol and Syst 37:637–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rachlewicz G, Szcucinski W, Ewertowski M (2007) Post-“Little Ice Age” retreat rates of glaciers around Billefjorden in central Spitsbergen, Svalbard. Polish Polar Res 28:159–186Google Scholar
  24. Rozema J, Boelen P, Doorenbosch M, Bohncke S, Blokker P, Boekel C, Broekman RA, Konert M (2006) A vegetation, climate and environment reconstruction based on palynological analyses of high arctic tundra peat cores (5000–6000 years BP) from Svalbard. Plant Ecol 182:155–173Google Scholar
  25. Thuiller W, Albert C, Araújo MB, Berry PM, Cabeza M, Guisan A, Hicker T, Midgley GF, Paterson J, Schurr FM, Sykes MT, Zimmermann NE (2008) Predicting global change impacts on plant species’ distributions: future challenges. Persp Plant Ecol Evol Syst 9:137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Walton J (1922) A Spitsbergen salt marsh: with observations on the ecological phenomena attendant on the emergence of land from the sea. J Ecol 10:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Welker JM, Molau U, Parson AN, Robinson CH, Wookey PA (1997) Response of Dryas octopetala to ITEX environmental manipulation: a synthesis with circumpolar comparisons. Global Change Biol 3:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wisz MS, Tamstorf MP, Madsen J, Jespersen M (2008) Where might the western Svalbard tundra be vulnerable to pink-footed goose (Anser brachyrhynchus) population expansion? Clues from species distribution models. Divers Distr 14:26–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wookey PA, Robinson CH, Parsons AN, Welker JM, Press MC, Callaghan TV, Lee JA (1995) Environmental constraints on the growth, photosynthesis and reproductive development of Dryas octopetala at a high arctic polar semidesert, Svalbard. Oecologia 102:478–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karel Prach
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jiří Košnar
    • 1
  • Jitka Klimešová
    • 2
  • Martin Hais
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Botany, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Section of Plant EcologyInstitute of Botany ASCRTrebonCzech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Ecosystem Biology, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations